The dupe in guild bank exploit resulted in some bans, my guess is that it depended on scale, if you used it generating millions of golds you got banned.
generating an stack of epic tempers for your own use and you got free.
Some others like the repeatable instead of daily pvp quests was not banable as it was not an obvious exploit it worked like it did in beta.
If you run into an world boss who always drop to purple and farm him its not an obvious bug, it could just be an boss with good loot. Getting an quest reward over an over is an obvious bug something like duping more so.
And exploits get patched then discovered, either players has to find new or new content will contain new exploitable bugs.
Who exploits, it was an dupe with hireling mail as i understand.The dupe in guild bank exploit resulted in some bans, my guess is that it depended on scale, if you used it generating millions of golds you got banned.
generating an stack of epic tempers for your own use and you got free.
Some others like the repeatable instead of daily pvp quests was not banable as it was not an obvious exploit it worked like it did in beta.
If you run into an world boss who always drop to purple and farm him its not an obvious bug, it could just be an boss with good loot. Getting an quest reward over an over is an obvious bug something like duping more so.
And exploits get patched then discovered, either players has to find new or new content will contain new exploitable bugs.
I do agree to some extent but half the exploits, if not more, were obvious exploits. People were aware of that. They chose to use them repeatedly, over and over. With huge rewards.
That's always good to hear. /sarcasm offrawne1980b16_ESO wrote: »My wife left a guild that exploited that dupe glitch.
None of them were banned.
Some of them are still selling stuff they got from it so they didn't get much in the way of punishment.
Who exploits, it was an dupe with hireling mail as i understand.The dupe in guild bank exploit resulted in some bans, my guess is that it depended on scale, if you used it generating millions of golds you got banned.
generating an stack of epic tempers for your own use and you got free.
Some others like the repeatable instead of daily pvp quests was not banable as it was not an obvious exploit it worked like it did in beta.
If you run into an world boss who always drop to purple and farm him its not an obvious bug, it could just be an boss with good loot. Getting an quest reward over an over is an obvious bug something like duping more so.
And exploits get patched then discovered, either players has to find new or new content will contain new exploitable bugs.
I do agree to some extent but half the exploits, if not more, were obvious exploits. People were aware of that. They chose to use them repeatedly, over and over. With huge rewards.
The vampire bit sale is more scams or griefing.
rawne1980b16_ESO wrote: »My wife left a guild that exploited that dupe glitch.
None of them were banned.
Some of them are still selling stuff they got from it so they didn't get much in the way of punishment.
But you have to prove they knew it. If I farmed a boss that kept dropping the same purple item, or gave a great amount of XP more than usual, I'd assume it was because of the boss. There are a lot of MMOs that have certain bosses with a guarenteed drop if defeated or a good xp reward if defeated.
Now. If that boss only took 1-5 hits to kill, then I might be thinking it's a bug.
Basically, Zeni doesn't want to do mass bannings unless they are positive it was an exploit and the people they were banning were aware as well. If you get enough people who feel they were wrongfully banned together, the company may be hit with either bad PR or a possible attempt at a class action. Yeah, spout out about internet lowers etc etc, but no company wants a group of players to band against them and make them look bad unless they have 100% definitive proof they knew they were exploiting.
metaldrummer1962b14a_ESO wrote: »They don't ban anyone, they want bot and exploiter subscription money.
lordrichter wrote: »You can be sure that if they do a ban for any exploits, we will hear about it in here with a thread about wrongful bans. That is usually the first indication that there is some sort of widespread ban episode going on. Quite a few people have to be banned before the statistical probability of such a posting rises high enough for us to see it.
As for people getting away with the duping, I suspect that the initial ban wave had rather loose criteria and they tightened up the criteria over time. Most of the worst of them were, and still are, banned, but I expect that the more casual offenders got a pass and a note in their account. I would expect that subsequent bans by these individuals would not be so easily reversed.
Most players don't read updates in detail, even if the week would be read as questing not grinding.dreildragb14_ESO wrote: »Level 50's 24-36 hours in early access should have been rolled back and/or had an account strike since it was clear by Zenimax it would take about a week of hard core gaming to even get close to that level.
Many people already said the pvp bounty mission was fixed late beta but not fixed in early access release, meaning it was a quest glitch that was massively exploited and they got away with it.
Most players don't read updates in detail, even if the week would be read as questing not grinding.dreildragb14_ESO wrote: »Level 50's 24-36 hours in early access should have been rolled back and/or had an account strike since it was clear by Zenimax it would take about a week of hard core gaming to even get close to that level.
Many people already said the pvp bounty mission was fixed late beta but not fixed in early access release, meaning it was a quest glitch that was massively exploited and they got away with it.
This one is still 33 and happy