scrappy1342 wrote: »didn't read through everything... but yeah, the bad actors thing is -the reason- why gifting is so hard to unlock. and no, they will never tell us the actual criteria because then the bad actors will be able to unlock it with no problems. -every- -single- -thread- i have seen posted here like yours asking about gifting being unlocked that they gave in and said "we'll give you the benefit of the doubt..." ended up in that account being banned usually IN LESS THAN A DAY because those ppl IMMEDIATELY did the bad actor thing.
if you legitimately can not get it unlocked and legitimately want to gift things to your friends, just find a crown seller, buy from them and have them gift it to your friend
Is that not one of the very behaviors they are wanting to subvert..?
scrappy1342 wrote: »
Is that not one of the very behaviors they are wanting to subvert..?
no, trading crowns for gold is perfectly legal because they are both in game currencies.
the paypal thing is totally legitimate, but i'm sure that can get tricky with trying to gift the exact amount of the thing you want to gift.
i would check your guilds and see if you can find someone willing and able to sell crowns. there is TCE, but it's more expensive that way. you are paying for peace of mind there. yes, it is possible to get ripped off buying from someone you don't know. as far as i know (or at least how it was in the past), zos would refund your gold ONE TIME if you got ripped off, but not after that, because really it is buy at your own risk. the way they handle customer service these days, you may not even get that one time. it seems that their policy with anything and everything these days is to automatically reject any ticket/complaint/request that comes through and if the person is -really really- serious about it, they will dispute and -then- you get a real response.
really what they should do, since they have confirmed over and over that they don't mind us trading gold/in game items for crowns, is to put in some sort of trading system specifically for that. but they won't. ppl have asked for it for years.
scrappy1342 wrote: »
Is that not one of the very behaviors they are wanting to subvert..?
no, trading crowns for gold is perfectly legal because they are both in game currencies.
the paypal thing is totally legitimate, but i'm sure that can get tricky with trying to gift the exact amount of the thing you want to gift.
i would check your guilds and see if you can find someone willing and able to sell crowns. there is TCE, but it's more expensive that way. you are paying for peace of mind there. yes, it is possible to get ripped off buying from someone you don't know. as far as i know (or at least how it was in the past), zos would refund your gold ONE TIME if you got ripped off, but not after that, because really it is buy at your own risk. the way they handle customer service these days, you may not even get that one time. it seems that their policy with anything and everything these days is to automatically reject any ticket/complaint/request that comes through and if the person is -really really- serious about it, they will dispute and -then- you get a real response.
really what they should do, since they have confirmed over and over that they don't mind us trading gold/in game items for crowns, is to put in some sort of trading system specifically for that. but they won't. ppl have asked for it for years.
Ok that clears things up for me - in essence they are funneling the trading activity through guilds - so in essence it is a discriminatory stance on their part with how they run their game - for people unfortunate to have not met the mystery requirements for gifting they are forced to use a guild..... interesting
Do I have that right or I am missing something (not asking to confirm discrimination portion just my understanding of how that trade for gifting works).
Here are five of the “known” criteria:
-No terms-of-service violations.
-Must have had your account for 180 days.
-Must have had ESO+ at some point.
-Must have a record of purchases.
-Must have consistent log-in data.
If you’re failing at any of the above, chances are, that is what your problem is.
SilverBride wrote: »I did a poll once after another of these gifting threads came up to gauge how often players actually use gifting, and the number was very low. I wish they would just do away with it all together if it's not being utilized any more than that.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/680740/how-often-do-you-gift-crown-store-items/p1
Hi everyone. Our Anti-Fraud team made up of Devs, Customer Service, and Community team members wanted to follow up here after monitoring this thread and engaging with the original poster of the thread. We believe it’s important to go over this case, because it’s a good example of a bad actor and the tactics they use to circumvent safety processes to do harm.
First, we want to acknowledge that while the gifting process can be frustrating, it is designed to keep both you, the player, and us safe from bad actors.
When the user originally placed their ticket in for gifting access, we denied their request due to account markers that showed future signs of potential fraudulent behavior. However, the user then opened this thread noting their playtime and claim to eligibility. In addition to their claims, we heard from many of you. We understand the frustration with the process and empathize with it. Many of you know that we often go through threads like this and try to assist where we can with the support of our customer service team.
Upon reevaluation of the account, we could tell the user was an active ESO player, but still had concerning markers on their account. We weighed the pros and cons of those risks and ultimately granted access to gifting. Unfortunately, within 24 hours, we were able to confirm new fraudulent behavior made by the user. They have now been permanently banned in-game and from the forum.
We highlight this because a common tactic bad actors use is the power of public forums here and elsewhere: taking advantage of the everyday player’s goodwill to garner public support to be let back in. Based on this situation, future threads like this will be based only on the follow-up investigation and closed once the investigation is complete.
To close out this post, we are still working to get as many people in as possible to the gifting program. We relaxed rules for gifting earlier this year and will continue to monitor these rules. Our goal is to stop bad actors, while keeping everyone else safe. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to read this follow up.
tomofhyrule wrote: »If gifting is disabled, there is still the option of just giving your friend money via PayPal or whatever else and them buying the Crowns themself, which - while not feeling as personal - still has the intent behind it.
tomofhyrule wrote: »We can't say what the criteria are since the point is that it's not supposed to be a checklist for bad actors to follow. It also seems that it's not so much a list of criteria but a counter for red flags in the account.
tomofhyrule wrote: »OP, I suggest you check out this thread: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/679605/do-you-think-my-account-demonstrates-minimal-gaming/p1
Same problem as you: someone who is totally 100% legit and thinks the only think wrong with the game is that they can't get gifting permissions. And like you, they start a whole tirade about how they should be able to gift. They drummed up a lot of public support and finally got permissions.
And then were almost immediately permabanned for fraud.
Kevin has the writeup in this post here if you want the specifics, including reasons why there are hoops to jump through:Hi everyone. Our Anti-Fraud team made up of Devs, Customer Service, and Community team members wanted to follow up here after monitoring this thread and engaging with the original poster of the thread. We believe it’s important to go over this case, because it’s a good example of a bad actor and the tactics they use to circumvent safety processes to do harm.
First, we want to acknowledge that while the gifting process can be frustrating, it is designed to keep both you, the player, and us safe from bad actors.
When the user originally placed their ticket in for gifting access, we denied their request due to account markers that showed future signs of potential fraudulent behavior. However, the user then opened this thread noting their playtime and claim to eligibility. In addition to their claims, we heard from many of you. We understand the frustration with the process and empathize with it. Many of you know that we often go through threads like this and try to assist where we can with the support of our customer service team.
Upon reevaluation of the account, we could tell the user was an active ESO player, but still had concerning markers on their account. We weighed the pros and cons of those risks and ultimately granted access to gifting. Unfortunately, within 24 hours, we were able to confirm new fraudulent behavior made by the user. They have now been permanently banned in-game and from the forum.
We highlight this because a common tactic bad actors use is the power of public forums here and elsewhere: taking advantage of the everyday player’s goodwill to garner public support to be let back in. Based on this situation, future threads like this will be based only on the follow-up investigation and closed once the investigation is complete.
To close out this post, we are still working to get as many people in as possible to the gifting program. We relaxed rules for gifting earlier this year and will continue to monitor these rules. Our goal is to stop bad actors, while keeping everyone else safe. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to read this follow up.
We can't say what the criteria are since the point is that it's not supposed to be a checklist for bad actors to follow. It also seems that it's not so much a list of criteria but a counter for red flags in the account.
I will just say that begging and begging for gifting permissions is a huge red flag though. If gifting is disabled, there is still the option of just giving your friend money via PayPal or whatever else and them buying the Crowns themself, which - while not feeling as personal - still has the intent behind it. The fact that your gift must be given in-game as opposed to buying your friend a physical gift card or dropping money to them on PayPal is a bit of a red flag in itself. I also notice that, like the OP of the other thread, you say you've been active on the game for ages, but your forum account is very new and only has a few posts on it... and only one of your posts isn't about your inability to gift.
DenverRalphy wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I did a poll once after another of these gifting threads came up to gauge how often players actually use gifting, and the number was very low. I wish they would just do away with it all together if it's not being utilized any more than that.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/680740/how-often-do-you-gift-crown-store-items/p1
40% of the respondents in that poll apparently do gift crowns. Or at least didn't vote Never. You propose getting rid of it altogether over that?
SilverBride wrote: »DenverRalphy wrote: »SilverBride wrote: »I did a poll once after another of these gifting threads came up to gauge how often players actually use gifting, and the number was very low. I wish they would just do away with it all together if it's not being utilized any more than that.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/680740/how-often-do-you-gift-crown-store-items/p1
40% of the respondents in that poll apparently do gift crowns. Or at least didn't vote Never. You propose getting rid of it altogether over that?
For all the trouble it's causing, yes.
To be honest - I do not believe the bad actors reason given - it is that they do not want to invest money in tightening up the gifting mechanic.
I would add here - that aside from the story aspect of the game running with my friends and being able to gift my less fortunate friends is the second largest thing I do in game
I find this interesting - and also lends even more weight to the sensation that gifting is discriminatory in some way
it seems like yall want to blame the messenger for a broken game mechanic
To be honest - I do not believe the bad actors reason given - it is that they do not want to invest money in tightening up the gifting mechanic.
They cannot "tighten it up" - the issue isn't in the system it's external to it. And you don't believe there is billions in credit card fraud every year? That hackers dedicated enough to breach any system? ... I'll stop here before I say something that will get me banned but JFC. /facepalm
I don't think there's anything left to say here...
They've been given a comprehensive explanation of what happened and why this system is in place.
They've been agreed with when saying it can feel unfair to non-criminal customers who can't figure out what criteria they aren't meeting.
They've provided their feedback that they are unhappy with this system and would like to see change.
They've elected to delete their account and exit the game.
We wish you well in your future endeavors.
When you are requesting gifting be enabled, it helps to remember that their checks are designed to combat financial fraud. They're not just looking for evidence that you are a real player; they are looking for evidence that you are a real person.
In the old days, when I was forced to make an account with a gaming company, I would use fake name, address, etc. Because screw their data collection. And I often times still do, depending on the company.
When you are requesting gifting be enabled, it helps to remember that their checks are designed to combat financial fraud. They're not just looking for evidence that you are a real player; they are looking for evidence that you are a real person.
In the old days, when I was forced to make an account with a gaming company, I would use fake name, address, etc. Because screw their data collection. And I often times still do, depending on the company.
All of the information in my account is correct - nothing fake. And like I said upthread, I've used the same credit card for ESO+, to buy crowns, to buy chapters/content passes, and items like the house bundle. I've never had a payment declined, asked for a refund, or done a chargeback for anything. So when they ran their algorithm to figure out what accounts to enable, that couldn't have been why my account failed the test.
I'm only stating this to once again say that every time I see someone say, "This is probably why your account doesn't have gifting enabled!!!!!" it doesn't apply to my account. Nobody knows the criteria, so speculating about it is pointless.
When you are requesting gifting be enabled, it helps to remember that their checks are designed to combat financial fraud. They're not just looking for evidence that you are a real player; they are looking for evidence that you are a real person.
In the old days, when I was forced to make an account with a gaming company, I would use fake name, address, etc. Because screw their data collection. And I often times still do, depending on the company.
All of the information in my account is correct - nothing fake. And like I said upthread, I've used the same credit card for ESO+, to buy crowns, to buy chapters/content passes, and items like the house bundle. I've never had a payment declined, asked for a refund, or done a chargeback for anything. So when they ran their algorithm to figure out what accounts to enable, that couldn't have been why my account failed the test.
I'm only stating this to once again say that every time I see someone say, "This is probably why your account doesn't have gifting enabled!!!!!" it doesn't apply to my account. Nobody knows the criteria, so speculating about it is pointless.
That's... kind of needed to get gifting enabled.I haven't asked for gifting to be added because I don't chase companies and ask them to let me spend money on their products.
tomofhyrule wrote: »When you are requesting gifting be enabled, it helps to remember that their checks are designed to combat financial fraud. They're not just looking for evidence that you are a real player; they are looking for evidence that you are a real person.
In the old days, when I was forced to make an account with a gaming company, I would use fake name, address, etc. Because screw their data collection. And I often times still do, depending on the company.
All of the information in my account is correct - nothing fake. And like I said upthread, I've used the same credit card for ESO+, to buy crowns, to buy chapters/content passes, and items like the house bundle. I've never had a payment declined, asked for a refund, or done a chargeback for anything. So when they ran their algorithm to figure out what accounts to enable, that couldn't have been why my account failed the test.
I'm only stating this to once again say that every time I see someone say, "This is probably why your account doesn't have gifting enabled!!!!!" it doesn't apply to my account. Nobody knows the criteria, so speculating about it is pointless.
Just looking at your posts from this thread, I think there's one primary reason you haven't gotten gifting enabled:That's... kind of needed to get gifting enabled.I haven't asked for gifting to be added because I don't chase companies and ask them to let me spend money on their products.
Since gifting was removed from all players because of the issues before, only those who specifically requested to get it reenabled have gotten it back. True, they have their own series of criteria as to what constitutes a low-risk account, but the default state of all accounts is "Gifting Disabled unless the account requests it."
So, have you requested gifting to be enabled?
tomofhyrule wrote: »Since gifting was removed from all players because of the issues before, only those who specifically requested to get it reenabled have gotten it back. True, they have their own series of criteria as to what constitutes a low-risk account, but the default state of all accounts is "Gifting Disabled unless the account requests it."