
This was explained two years ago:
They have a broken gifting mechanic that they are unwilling to fix and it keeps legit players like myself and others from enjoying this part of the game.
It's lame and unacceptable that a gaming studio cannot solve abuses of a mechanic in their own game other than to just turn the mechanic off.
Just remove gifting completely from everyone - make it fair at least.
They have a broken gifting mechanic that they are unwilling to fix and it keeps legit players like myself and others from enjoying this part of the game.
It's lame and unacceptable that a gaming studio cannot solve abuses of a mechanic in their own game other than to just turn the mechanic off.
Just remove gifting completely from everyone - make it fair at least.
All systems are exploitable if someone is dedicated enough. I'm not happy that my bank occassionally flags a possible fraudulent payment, but I'm also grateful that such a check exists to prevent bad actors from exploiting the system - because that check IS the fix to the abuse.
You are complaining about a lack of transparency that if given would help the bad actors. You also appear to be taking it as a personal afront that you can't access, what is an unitended consequence (the exchange of gold for crown store items) of the system that makes up 0.0000000000001% of the game as if it is the only reason you play.
Now, ZOS could implement an official gifting system, much like they have for mail items, that has a C.O.D option when sending the gift, but that doesn't solve the initial problem of people getting crowns that they should not have. I have no idea how they are managing to do so, but it's an online system and therefore is hackable.
So, while ZOS could do more to protect the buyers of "gifts" (oxymoronic), they cannot stop the root cause which is the aberrant crowns. If you know a way to make an online system 100% secure then send ZOS an email, along with one to the NSA - because heck, even they have been hacked - or you can simply accept that for whatever reason ZOS just won't allow you to spend your crowns in this manner.
They have a broken gifting mechanic that they are unwilling to fix and it keeps legit players like myself and others from enjoying this part of the game.
It's lame and unacceptable that a gaming studio cannot solve abuses of a mechanic in their own game other than to just turn the mechanic off.
Just remove gifting completely from everyone - make it fair at least.
All systems are exploitable if someone is dedicated enough. I'm not happy that my bank occassionally flags a possible fraudulent payment, but I'm also grateful that such a check exists to prevent bad actors from exploiting the system - because that check IS the fix to the abuse.
You are complaining about a lack of transparency that if given would help the bad actors. You also appear to be taking it as a personal afront that you can't access, what is an unitended consequence (the exchange of gold for crown store items) of the system that makes up 0.0000000000001% of the game as if it is the only reason you play.
Now, ZOS could implement an official gifting system, much like they have for mail items, that has a C.O.D option when sending the gift, but that doesn't solve the initial problem of people getting crowns that they should not have. I have no idea how they are managing to do so, but it's an online system and therefore is hackable.
So, while ZOS could do more to protect the buyers of "gifts" (oxymoronic), they cannot stop the root cause which is the aberrant crowns. If you know a way to make an online system 100% secure then send ZOS an email, along with one to the NSA - because heck, even they have been hacked - or you can simply accept that for whatever reason ZOS just won't allow you to spend your crowns in this manner.
To be honest - I do not believe the bad actors reason given - it is that they do not want to invest money in tightening up the gifting mechanic.
In the other thread I mentioned I do not want to send gold or crowns - I want to spend them on things like mounts and skins and items and send those as gifts - surely they can solve for this.
Let's at least all get on the same page in regards to how we got here (at least my understanding of it):
Fraudsters use stolen credit card numbers to buy a virtual gaming currency (Crowns).
They sell the crowns via illegal websites for real life cash (a TOS violation from both parties).
The real life currency has now been laundered/converted to cash in a way that's pretty much impossible to trace.
This became so rampant that it was putting the ZOS' merchant accounts in danger. Credit Card companies are only going to write off so much fraud before they revoke a merchant's account if they don't feel the merchant is properly trying to address the issue.
ZOS cut off *all* crown gifting while they worked on a solution to make it far more difficult for this laundering to occur.
The end result is this secretive set of checkboxes your account must meet in order to be approved to gift crowns.
I certainly understand the frustration from those who've been long time players / invested a lot of money into the game /etc. It all sounds good on paper until you're the one being denied the privelege while feeling the basic message of "We can't rule out you're a criminal'. (and I say this as someone who has had this privilege since the start).
I'm not an expert in this field and I don't know what the "better" ways to do this would be that would allow for more people to qualify without taking the levels of fraudulent transactions to a point of jeopardizing their merchant account(s).
There's also been passionate cases plead here on the forums and I remember one case where ZOS relented, only to publicly post a day or so later that, because they had concerns the story might be fake, they monitored the account and the person turned out to be commiting fraud. tbh, that all felt a bit performative to me that they would openly "Name & Shame" someone so that they could say "see, this is why we can't have benefit of the doubt and must follow our secret rules to the letter".
I kinda walked away from that thinking "If you can detect that fast...". But I digress.
It's definitely a challening issue and perhaps the fairest answer, if they can't find some middle ground to at least cautiously let folks like the OP gift while being monitored closely, is to disable crown gifting for all. But that comes at the expense of losing revenue and all of the players who do love using the gifting system.
So I dunno. I feel that ZOS has been pretty transparent on all of this and *they* feel they're doing what they can to walk this tightrope.
I am not saying there was not a bad actor problem - but how is that my problem to solve? An infinite crowns fraud/abuse would not be worth anything if you can't send crowns to others right ?
All I want to do is buy stuff from the store and send it to friends - that is not much to ask - I do not need to send them gold or crowns. Yes all games are exploitable but the bottom line here is that they do not want to spend the time or effort to improve the gaming experience in this area - if that is the decision then just remove gifting for everyone from the game - at least make it fair - I would be ok with that - mystery criteria or not investing in a fix that works for everyone tells me that in this area they really could care less about the players - and you know I have been going through some of these threads trying to cool off some on this issue because it has me red hot mad atm and what am I seeing ? I am not seeing how great the game is and how people just can't wait to play - I can tell you that - what I am seeing is a plethora of posts about how people like the game and hate to leave but <fll-in-the-blank> issue has persisted and they are ready to walk away from it. I will eventually get there myself - is it worth getting upset over something that the management could care less about ? Probably not - it is my love of the game that has me here trying to bring attention to something.
Let's at least all get on the same page in regards to how we got here (at least my understanding of it):
What if they only allowed gifting of items that were not crowns or gold from the store? Where is the exploit there ? I am sure someone could buy something from someone else outside channel violating the TOS but if you limited the ability to gift to only so many per account - it could even be ridiculously low like 1 a day or 1 a week - that I could still work with - but not at all ? Also - I don't think they are acting in good faith on this issue - there was a decision made to do this cop out approach rather than to actually try and forge a workable solution. Hell I would do what they do for adult sites these days and link my stuff to my irl details if that is what it takes but that is not even an option - the answer here is that it is because they do not care - they don't want to invest in it, they only want to make money off of it with no risk - who is to say if one of their accounts that does get gifting through whatever mystery criteria is not a bad one ? How are they catching that ? Why can't that be used at scale..?
I am not saying there was not a bad actor problem - but how is that my problem to solve? An infinite crowns fraud/abuse would not be worth anything if you can't send crowns to others right ?
All I want to do is buy stuff from the store and send it to friends - that is not much to ask - I do not need to send them gold or crowns. Yes all games are exploitable but the bottom line here is that they do not want to spend the time or effort to improve the gaming experience in this area - if that is the decision then just remove gifting for everyone from the game - at least make it fair - I would be ok with that - mystery criteria or not investing in a fix that works for everyone tells me that in this area they really could care less about the players - and you know I have been going through some of these threads trying to cool off some on this issue because it has me red hot mad atm and what am I seeing ? I am not seeing how great the game is and how people just can't wait to play - I can tell you that - what I am seeing is a plethora of posts about how people like the game and hate to leave but <fll-in-the-blank> issue has persisted and they are ready to walk away from it. I will eventually get there myself - is it worth getting upset over something that the management could care less about ? Probably not - it is my love of the game that has me here trying to bring attention to something.
I'm sorry but (see my post above), but "buy(ing) stuff from the (crown) store to send it to friends" is exactly how the fraud is occurring.
Also, they *have* put significant time and effort into this issue. We can feel perhaps it wasn't enough, or they didn't come up with the best solution, but they definitely put in effort to get this turned on for as many people as they felt possible. They have every motivation (read: $$) to do that.
If someone knows of a "fix that work with everyone", I'm sure everyone, including ZOS, would love the details. It's clear they've struggled with this.
I totally get it, @Gold25Dog. Your situation wouldn't feel good for anyone.
Any loyal, paying, non-criminal customer being denied a feature others get because they can't be sure You're Not a Criminal is going to feel bad. NO ONE is going to feel great in that situation. And it's double sad that criminals will roleplay as people like you to gain access.
But I also understand what ZOS is up against and i have watched them attempt to find a middle ground. I'm no expert on how all of this works today, but at one point in my life, I did work for AmEx and have a little bit of insight into fraud prevention / merchant relationships. ZOS is definitely in a tough spot.
I hope contstructive feedback continues to encourage them to evolve this program and find "safe-ish" ways to get more people authenticated.
SilverBride wrote: »From what I gather, it's more of a money laundering concern.
Kiyakotari wrote: »I play on multiple accounts, and some of them have gifting enabled. Some do not. I've just accepted at this point that if I get crowns on the accounts that can't gift, they'll only be used on those accounts. It's not ideal for me, especially in instances where I pay for ESO+ on one of those accounts and then might want to use the ESO+ crown allotment to gift something to another one of my accounts, but it's not the end of the world. I am glad that ZOS was able to address the fraud issues and potential money laundering that was happening, as I'd much rather be without gifting than be without ESO at all.
Here are five of the “known” criteria:
-No terms-of-service violations.
-Must have had your account for 180 days.
-Must have had ESO+ at some point.
-Must have a record of purchases.
-Must have consistent log-in data.
If you’re failing at any of the above, chances are, that is what your problem is.
I totally get it, @Gold25Dog. Your situation wouldn't feel good for anyone.
Any loyal, paying, non-criminal customer being denied a feature others get because they can't be sure You're Not a Criminal is going to feel bad. NO ONE is going to feel great in that situation. And it's double sad that criminals will roleplay as people like you to gain access.
But I also understand what ZOS is up against and i have watched them attempt to find a middle ground. I'm no expert on how all of this works today, but at one point in my life, I did work for AmEx and have a little bit of insight into fraud prevention / merchant relationships. ZOS is definitely in a tough spot.
I hope contstructive feedback continues to encourage them to evolve this program and find "safe-ish" ways to get more people authenticated.
I have worked in fintech for the last 20 years - its one of the reasons I have money to spend but no time to play lol
So what is the deal here on the fraud - are they buying the in-game currency and then disputing the charges once the money has been spent and can't be recovered ? I would think they could put in-game transaction caps and delays that would frustrate fraudsters to the point of it not being viable - buying something for your account sure right away, something for someone else then the just purchased currency needs to cure past the detection window before it can be used that way (for a gift) or the gift can cure - aka the fruits of it are not released until the original transaction has cured - I would be down for that because I could still gift it would just not be immediately available.
Gadamlub14_ESO wrote: »I totally get it, @Gold25Dog. Your situation wouldn't feel good for anyone.
Any loyal, paying, non-criminal customer being denied a feature others get because they can't be sure You're Not a Criminal is going to feel bad. NO ONE is going to feel great in that situation. And it's double sad that criminals will roleplay as people like you to gain access.
But I also understand what ZOS is up against and i have watched them attempt to find a middle ground. I'm no expert on how all of this works today, but at one point in my life, I did work for AmEx and have a little bit of insight into fraud prevention / merchant relationships. ZOS is definitely in a tough spot.
I hope contstructive feedback continues to encourage them to evolve this program and find "safe-ish" ways to get more people authenticated.
I have worked in fintech for the last 20 years - its one of the reasons I have money to spend but no time to play lol
So what is the deal here on the fraud - are they buying the in-game currency and then disputing the charges once the money has been spent and can't be recovered ? I would think they could put in-game transaction caps and delays that would frustrate fraudsters to the point of it not being viable - buying something for your account sure right away, something for someone else then the just purchased currency needs to cure past the detection window before it can be used that way (for a gift) or the gift can cure - aka the fruits of it are not released until the original transaction has cured - I would be down for that because I could still gift it would just not be immediately available.
people would steal credit card info via various means.
They'd buy crowns with the stolen cards
They'd sell stuff at a discount via gold selling sites and the like via the gifting mechanics.
Stolen cards then get chargebacks and Zos takes the hit.
Now look, there are too many things to count to get mad at zos over. but seeing you get into such a tizzy over gifting to where you are spamming half the forum about it is definitely the least of all things to get mad over, and to be frank, is downright sus and reminds me of the guy Zos named and shammed for making a similar stink only to get caught RMTing within a week after they gave him gifting access.
Gadamlub14_ESO wrote: »I totally get it, @Gold25Dog. Your situation wouldn't feel good for anyone.
Any loyal, paying, non-criminal customer being denied a feature others get because they can't be sure You're Not a Criminal is going to feel bad. NO ONE is going to feel great in that situation. And it's double sad that criminals will roleplay as people like you to gain access.
But I also understand what ZOS is up against and i have watched them attempt to find a middle ground. I'm no expert on how all of this works today, but at one point in my life, I did work for AmEx and have a little bit of insight into fraud prevention / merchant relationships. ZOS is definitely in a tough spot.
I hope contstructive feedback continues to encourage them to evolve this program and find "safe-ish" ways to get more people authenticated.
I have worked in fintech for the last 20 years - its one of the reasons I have money to spend but no time to play lol
So what is the deal here on the fraud - are they buying the in-game currency and then disputing the charges once the money has been spent and can't be recovered ? I would think they could put in-game transaction caps and delays that would frustrate fraudsters to the point of it not being viable - buying something for your account sure right away, something for someone else then the just purchased currency needs to cure past the detection window before it can be used that way (for a gift) or the gift can cure - aka the fruits of it are not released until the original transaction has cured - I would be down for that because I could still gift it would just not be immediately available.
people would steal credit card info via various means.
They'd buy crowns with the stolen cards
They'd sell stuff at a discount via gold selling sites and the like via the gifting mechanics.
Stolen cards then get chargebacks and Zos takes the hit.
Now look, there are too many things to count to get mad at zos over. but seeing you get into such a tizzy over gifting to where you are spamming half the forum about it is definitely the least of all things to get mad over, and to be frank, is downright sus and reminds me of the guy Zos named and shammed for making a similar stink only to get caught RMTing within a week after they gave him gifting access.
You can be sus that is your rightthat said I am real and if you want to find out I will share my irl details in dm with you - and yes I am being active because it is a wound I have let fester for too long - so apologies for yall getting the brunt of it but I am seriously about to walk away from this game and that really sucks for me - if you want to refund the 500+ dollars I have spent on in-game stuff not to mention the game itsself and we can talk about me going away without any more words, otherwise until I burn out you are going to be stuck with me on this....
queenlarxene wrote: »I don't think that having spent any particular amount of money on the game makes it any more understandable for you to chuck this much of a wobbly over a fairly small thing. Like, this impacts how you enjoy the game, I get it. But like, if you are this upset over it then that's super unhealthy and you should find ways to spend your time that don't make you feel that way?
The money is spent, and nobody at Zenimax has the ability to refund the money that you've presumably spent over the entire time you've played for this reason.
I doubt all of this ranting and complaining is even making you feel any better anyway...
queenlarxene wrote: »I do get that (I've had ESO+ for years and I've bought multiple chapters when they were fresh out, I've certainly spent far more than my fair share on this game), but it's also been clearly explained WHY they won't tell you (or anyone else). You can disagree with the reasoning if you want, but that's what it is and it's not going to change because you blow up the forums.
queenlarxene wrote: »I didn't have it enabled by default, but I did submit a request not long after it was opened up and that was accepted. I've only sent about a dozen gifts ever, and that includes using my ESO+ crowns to buy DLC's for my (now) ex when I was trying to get him into the game.
I'm an incredibly active player though and have been for the last 5 years or so (and less actively from the launch on consoles until 2020ish). I have ESO+, I play every day, usually on multiple characters, I'm in multiple guilds, I've engaged with basically every type of content to some degree at some point.
I can see how it would be incredibly frustrating to not know what else you needed to do to be able to send gifts. I just don't see how you think literally calling them and speaking to a person (which I didn't even know was a thing you could do) wouldn't work, but spamming the forums would.
You have the only answer you're likely to get, I hope for your own sake, you can accept it and find something you actually enjoy to do instead.