Having a horrible experience this week.

Theist_VII

LadyGP wrote: »

It's really bad PR having all these puff pieces written about you. I wish some media sites would actually talk about true performance not just writing click baity articles.

Why do you suppose that is?

I’ve often wondered that myself. For a while I assumed all Game Journalists are paid off, but there’s no possible way that could be true.

Like how is it that they will cover bad launches and game closures but when a game deteriorates to an unplayable state, nobody mentions it?

LadyGP

Theist_VII wrote: »

LadyGP wrote: »

It's really bad PR having all these puff pieces written about you. I wish some media sites would actually talk about true performance not just writing click baity articles.

Why do you suppose that is?

I’ve often wondered that myself. For a while I assumed all Game Journalists are paid off, but there’s no possible way that could be true.

Like how is it that they will cover bad launches and game closures but when a game deteriorates to an unplayable state, nobody mentions it?

So... it is tough to tell but I will say this.

I used to work in media for 8 years before transitioning to a new career path to where I am now as a Senior Software Engineer.

I'm not going to make claims for anyone or say this is how every single case is - my general observations were the following.

The people who write these pieces tend to be younger or new in the scene. There is an urgency to get your foot in the door and getting to write a story about ZoS and ESO being 10 years old is an awesome story to write. There are so many paths you can go down and history with the stories they have put out... its bad ass content to write about.

IF the person who was given access to talk about ESO writes a story that is negative and trashes the game there might be some internal pressure from the company who the writer works for (not always the case but I've seen pushback from leads in the sense of "We have a great thing going with this company how could you write something like that". Also if the person does write something bad the odds of them getting another chance to work/write about other studios goes down hill.

If you have a "thats the person who wrote that hit piece about ESO" on your resume do you think other studios are going to line up and give you a shot?

I'm in no way saying there was deliberate manipulation or anything at play... just how things tend to come out in the wash as you establish connections in the industry.

Now, people who make youtube videos or their livelihood come from their own success - thats a different story. That is why you see SOOOOOOOO many negative things about ESO on other platforms where the content creator is their own boss.

Theist_VII

Now that the week’s PTS notes are up, can we have some form of response?

LadyGP

Wow, ZOS seriously closed the other main lag thread. @ZOS_Kevin what the hell is up with this?

Seravi

LadyGP wrote: »

Wow, ZOS seriously closed the other main lag thread. @ZOS_Kevin what the hell is up with this?

Yep can you believe it??

LadyGP

Seravi wrote: »

LadyGP wrote: »

Wow, ZOS seriously closed the other main lag thread. @ZOS_Kevin what the hell is up with this?

Yep can you believe it??

I really hope it was just a mix up.

skyrimfantasy

I just...... wow.

valenwood_vegan

Theist_VII wrote: »

Now that the week’s PTS notes are up, can we have some form of response?

Well... we do seem to have had some form of a response!

In all seriousness, @ZOS_Kevin - I implore you to reconsider the decision that was made to close the 55 page thread on this topic that have you have been responding to.

Xandreia_

@ZOS_Kevin why was the original post closed down by @ZOS_Hadeostry , not a good move imo!

ZOS_Hadeostry

Sorry about that, there was some miscommunication between Kevin and I. Closing this one up and we have re-opened the one here.

Thank you for your understanding.

ZOS_Kevin

Xandreia_ wrote: »

@ZOS_Kevin why was the original post closed down by @ZOS_Hadeostry , not a good move imo!

That was not intended. There was a miscommunication. We meant to close another thread and redirect to the original thread, to keep feedback in one central place.