Hapexamendios wrote: »If you don't like his comments, ignore them. Publicity is what they are seeking so don't draw attention to it.
There's another thing that bothers me about the whole story: assuming I take part in Housing Tours and open up my houses, I would do that as part of the game. To interact with the community in-game. But it would bother me extremely if someone else then made videos of my houses and presented them on some other platform. Sure, you could say that by participating in Housing Tours I am making my content available to the public, but the basic idea is that I am doing this for the in-game community and not for use by others on platforms outside of the game. And it's even worse when these people then use the content for their own financial gain.
For me there are more than enough reasons not to take part in Housing Tours.
People looking for blood because someone said something mean about their little virtual house in a make believe game? What a time to be playing this game. Just move on and ignore it.
Reginald_leBlem wrote: »It sounds like he is offering his opinion about publicly listed houses for entertainment value, in a space that you have to enter voluntarily. Why do you care?
I have no idea what kind of stuff this guy is saying, but I am pretty certain any PvP related stream/video will contain just as much provocative content.
Where does this need to police people playing video games come frome?
And in the end, de gustibus non est disputandum.
It's rude, frankly, and it discourages people from participating. I don't see any reason to tolerate or encourage poor behavior. Most of us are chill and play the game to have fun, picking apart builds and saying snarky things is mean-spirited, and while I don't see why it should be ban worthy, a warning or a temporary social ban might make it a less viable pastime.
People looking for blood because someone said something mean about their little virtual house in a make believe game? What a time to be playing this game. Just move on and ignore it.
I'm not seeing the difference between something someone has created in game and any other creative work, to be frank.
valenwood_vegan wrote: »
How unfortunate.
valenwood_vegan wrote: »
SeaGtGruff wrote: »valenwood_vegan wrote: »
That depends on which specific rules you're talking about, because there are also in-game rules, several of which do coincide with similar rules on these forums.
Also, a few years ago the terms of agreement were updated and there were additional statements about ZOS being able to look at your other accounts-- such as Twitch, YouTube, X/Twitter, etc.-- which they would presumably only do if there were a reason to, such as investigating complaints.
So, yes, your out-of-game behavior might conceivably lead to being banned if said behavior were directed at other players and were considered egregious enough. How likely it might be is another question, but it isn't completely outside the realm of possibility. And as with everything else that involves an agreement for use of services, if you don't agree to the terms, then you are free to not use the services-- and if you break your agreement, you can have your ability to use the services revoked.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »valenwood_vegan wrote: »
That depends on which specific rules you're talking about, because there are also in-game rules, several of which do coincide with similar rules on these forums.
Also, a few years ago the terms of agreement were updated and there were additional statements about ZOS being able to look at your other accounts-- such as Twitch, YouTube, X/Twitter, etc.-- which they would presumably only do if there were a reason to, such as investigating complaints.
So, yes, your out-of-game behavior might conceivably lead to being banned if said behavior were directed at other players and were considered egregious enough. How likely it might be is another question, but it isn't completely outside the realm of possibility. And as with everything else that involves an agreement for use of services, if you don't agree to the terms, then you are free to not use the services-- and if you break your agreement, you can have your ability to use the services revoked.
DenverRalphy wrote: »The Naming and Shaming policy reaches exactly as far as the Forum Moderators and In-Game GM's have the tools to take action.
The ToS authority for player conduct doesn't reach beyond the walls of the game or the forums or any virtual entity not owned and operated by ZoS.
Reginald_leBlem wrote: »A twitch streamer is using housing tours as a way to boost his own engagement, by visiting random houses and trash talking them. The videos are also being uploaded to other social media sites. This is obviously not in the spirit of the game, but is this behavior actually reportable?
SeaGtGruff wrote: »DenverRalphy wrote: »The Naming and Shaming policy reaches exactly as far as the Forum Moderators and In-Game GM's have the tools to take action.
The ToS authority for player conduct doesn't reach beyond the walls of the game or the forums or any virtual entity not owned and operated by ZoS.
They can't take action outside the game and forums, but they could conceivably take action (i.e., issue a ban) within the game or forums for egregious behavior involving the game and other players. Again, I'm not saying this qualifies, just commenting in general with regard to the CoC and ToS.