I assume that for a copy to be made, whoever's doing the copying must have at least visitor permission? I just revoked all permissions to 2 of my houses because of this thread.
BetweenMidgets wrote: »I definitely sympathize with those that this has happened to. I really hate to see this happen. I hate to say it, but I'm fairly certain I've seen a copy of your first cathedral on NA.
I hope some nice resolution can be found so that folks can still back up their builds, or export ones made on PTS so they can replicate it on live, but without the risk of others stealing.
My one point of conflict in the pictures you posted is the one of a "copy" of Ayalockheart's creation. That one is definitely not a copy, as different items are even used in the build. I could grant they likely took inspiration from Ayalockheart's great creation, but that one does not demonstrate someone exporting a build via EHT and then uploading an exact copy. I believe that particular instance does not help your case.
BetweenMidgets wrote: »IMO your issue with EHT is valid and the inclusion things that "could not be done with EHT" but very similar isn't helpful and could have people discount the point I think you're making - that it IS possible to make a copy of someone's work and then "place" that work in your own home with a few clicks.
The one I pointed out doesn't help your case and could muddy the water, is all I'm saying.
I don't think many people would condemn someone taking inspiration and doing the work to make something similar. The two have more than a handful of things that are dissimilar.
BetweenMidgets wrote: »IMO your issue with EHT is valid and the inclusion things that "could not be done with EHT" but very similar isn't helpful and could have people discount the point I think you're making - that it IS possible to make a copy of someone's work and then "place" that work in your own home with a few clicks.
The one I pointed out doesn't help your case and could muddy the water, is all I'm saying.
I don't think many people would condemn someone taking inspiration and doing the work to make something similar. The two have more than a handful of things that are dissimilar.
No input from ZOS should be needed, as far as I can see. The EHT source code already contains some code checking for different levels of house permission, so the addon could be updated to only allow the copying action if the visitor has the "decorate" permission.This thread has made me wonder if Cardinal05 still works for ZOS. If so, he might be able to add influence to a change to ESO where higher authority is required for that feature to even be viable. Assuming he wishes to do so, of course.
No input from ZOS should be needed, as far as I can see. The EHT source code already contains some code checking for different levels of house permission, so the addon could be updated to only allow the copying action if the visitor has the "decorate" permission.This thread has made me wonder if Cardinal05 still works for ZOS. If so, he might be able to add influence to a change to ESO where higher authority is required for that feature to even be viable. Assuming he wishes to do so, of course.
Yes, but it takes coding and effort, so that will narrow down the list of players willing to rip off other players' house builds to those willing to put in that effort. In the SHORT term, updating EHT is a good enough solution. But I agree the long-term solution would need ZOS to update the API to remove this exploit.No input from ZOS should be needed, as far as I can see. The EHT source code already contains some code checking for different levels of house permission, so the addon could be updated to only allow the copying action if the visitor has the "decorate" permission.This thread has made me wonder if Cardinal05 still works for ZOS. If so, he might be able to add influence to a change to ESO where higher authority is required for that feature to even be viable. Assuming he wishes to do so, of course.
Pandora's box. If an addon can do it, any addon can do it. Remove it from EHT and it can simply reappear in another place. If ZOS fixes by changing the game, then every addon will be prevented from doing it.
No input from ZOS should be needed, as far as I can see. The EHT source code already contains some code checking for different levels of house permission, so the addon could be updated to only allow the copying action if the visitor has the "decorate" permission.This thread has made me wonder if Cardinal05 still works for ZOS. If so, he might be able to add influence to a change to ESO where higher authority is required for that feature to even be viable. Assuming he wishes to do so, of course.
Pandora's box. If an addon can do it, any addon can do it. Remove it from EHT and it can simply reappear in another place. If ZOS fixes by changing the game, then every addon will be prevented from doing it.
So as someone that was copied (at least only once as far as I can tell), I have a conflicting opinion.
I don't mind people copying me as long as they don't pass it off as their own creation and/or enter housing contests with it. In some ways it's the highest form of praise & if it makes someone happy, why would I care.
Of course the problem arises if they do pass it off as their own or enter contests with it.
I'm a person that comes up with a housing idea and the first thing I do is I go to the EHT housing hub and travel around other houses for inspiration and ideas, I feel like I'm still new to the housing scene and I don't have the level of intricate knowledge of every furnishing that exists. So traveling around and at times inspecting "hey what's this item", and so on, makes me a better builder in general.
So I personally would hate for people to resort to having inspect mode being disabled!
However a solution (if even possible) I think would make sense is simply disabling the copy/paste import/export function in any houses you do not own yourself.
Yes technically someone could just write a new addon to add that functionality back, but as PrincessOfThieves mentioned - I don't think the kind of person that would copy & paste another person's creation would go through the work of doing that.
That's my 2 cents.
BetweenMidgets wrote: »My one point of conflict in the pictures you posted is the one of a "copy" of Ayalockheart's creation. That one is definitely not a copy, as different items are even used in the build. I could grant they likely took inspiration from Ayalockheart's great creation, but that one does not demonstrate someone exporting a build via EHT and then uploading an exact copy. I believe that particular instance does not help your case.
Ayalockheart wrote: »
I appreciate your perspective on the matter. However, I must disagree. While some structural items or statues have been changed, likely due to not having the exact items and placing substitutes, the overall design, structure, and concept were undeniably copied (there is much more to that build than what you see here).
BetweenMidgets wrote: »Ayalockheart wrote: »
I appreciate your perspective on the matter. However, I must disagree. While some structural items or statues have been changed, likely due to not having the exact items and placing substitutes, the overall design, structure, and concept were undeniably copied (there is much more to that build than what you see here).
I can only go off what I can see in the pictures provided. From those, it is still my opinion that would fall under inspiration and not copying. You and @Mloking say differently, and as you two are privy to more details, I'm happy to default to you both in this instance.
Either way, and despite that particular instance, I fully agree that copying someone's design is bad. I hope a solution can be found so we can still import/export our builds, but protects them from being ripped off by others.
tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »Very interesting! I feel that there's no harm in someone copying a house if they see a build that they like, but posting it as an EHT listing is weird. However, EHT eliminating features just to prevent that would take things away from people. (But it wouldn't be a big deal, people will adapt and maybe that change would be worth it.)
My reasoning is like this. I don't think it's possible to "plagiarize" or "steal" someone's housing build because there's no way to "publish" or own a housing build, just like an outfit or a combat build. Since EHT and PTF have no (or very little?) oversight about their public listings, it's not the right place for discussions of credit.
Like an outfit or a combat build, I see my in-game activities and expression as open source and non-owned, and don't want to control or police other people.
I guess I've always seen houses as open source, so saying that someone copying your build "takes away from your work" doesn't make sense to me. Your satisfaction should come from having a product that you created and the time you spent enjoying creating it.
If people wanted to build a verified original creation list, then that community would be the place to discuss ownership and verification. Are EHT or PTF public listings claiming to be verified original creations?
If someone sees my build that someone else copies, either they don't know me well enough to know that I made it, or they're a stranger to me. Actually, so far I've contributed to 3-4 builds in other people's houses, so a visitor wouldn't know what to credit me with unless someone told them.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »No input from ZOS should be needed, as far as I can see. The EHT source code already contains some code checking for different levels of house permission, so the addon could be updated to only allow the copying action if the visitor has the "decorate" permission.This thread has made me wonder if Cardinal05 still works for ZOS. If so, he might be able to add influence to a change to ESO where higher authority is required for that feature to even be viable. Assuming he wishes to do so, of course.
Pandora's box. If an addon can do it, any addon can do it. Remove it from EHT and it can simply reappear in another place. If ZOS fixes by changing the game, then every addon will be prevented from doing it.
I honestly don't think that people who are so lazy that they copy other's stuff can make a complex addon like this.
tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »Very interesting! I feel that there's no harm in someone copying a house if they see a build that they like, but posting it as an EHT listing is weird. However, EHT eliminating features just to prevent that would take things away from people. (But it wouldn't be a big deal, people will adapt and maybe that change would be worth it.)
My reasoning is like this. I don't think it's possible to "plagiarize" or "steal" someone's housing build because there's no way to "publish" or own a housing build, just like an outfit or a combat build. Since EHT and PTF have no (or very little?) oversight about their public listings, it's not the right place for discussions of credit.
Like an outfit or a combat build, I see my in-game activities and expression as open source and non-owned, and don't want to control or police other people.
I guess I've always seen houses as open source, so saying that someone copying your build "takes away from your work" doesn't make sense to me. Your satisfaction should come from having a product that you created and the time you spent enjoying creating it.
If people wanted to build a verified original creation list, then that community would be the place to discuss ownership and verification. Are EHT or PTF public listings claiming to be verified original creations?
If someone sees my build that someone else copies, either they don't know me well enough to know that I made it, or they're a stranger to me. Actually, so far I've contributed to 3-4 builds in other people's houses, so a visitor wouldn't know what to credit me with unless someone told them.