Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
I don't know why you guys keep estimating things like 77 or hundreds of purple boxes per character unless every single last one of you has no job and just grinds Craglorn for 8 hours.
That is absolute absurd and in no way realistic.
Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I said several times already that I found not fair all of them were fully rewarded, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
Whatever their motivation...
- they installed and logged on to PTS as ZOS asked them to do.
- ZOS still gets useful data and useful hype (well, except maybe this time)
- they're getting locked out of their account for at least 10 days if not longer.
But setting that aside, how would you right this "wrong"? I'm super curious how ZOS could pull that off if they even wanted to.
Respond this to me please.
Player 1:
1 - Logs in to the PTS, checks, tests, plays, provides feedback (or not) but uses time checking stuff on the PTS.
2 - Participates on the Anniversary event, farms style pages, do their endeavors, claims their daily rewards, etc.
Player 2:
1 - Logs in to the PTS for 15 mins, remains idle and got kicked for being AFK.
2 - Dos not participate at all on the Anniversary event bacause they don't care for style pages nor anything, never do the Endavours because don't care neither, etc.
Should Player 1 and Player 2 be FULLY rewarded by ZOS the same way?
how would you have ZOS determine who is worthy and who isn't?
Dragonnord wrote: »
Respond this to me please.
Player 1:
1 - Logs in to the PTS, checks, tests, plays, provides feedback (or not) but uses time checking stuff on the PTS.
2 - Participates on the Anniversary event, farms style pages, do their endeavors, claims their daily rewards, etc.
Player 2:
1 - Logs in to the PTS for 15 mins, remains idle and got kicked for being AFK.
2 - Dos not participate at all on the Anniversary event bacause they don't care for style pages nor anything, never do the Endavours because don't care neither, etc.
Should Player 1 and Player 2 be FULLY rewarded by ZOS the same way?
Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
It sounds like you're mad about one particular person. Maybe you should just block them so you don't have to hear them talk about it?
For many, this lock out has been devastating for so many reasons. It would be brighten my day if some would just put the salt shaker down, at least until our accounts are back.
And that would include ZOS, who sent a "Free Gold Road Prologue Quest – Available Now" to my banned account email.
Dragonnord wrote: »
tomofhyrule wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
Which, as several people have pointed out, 1) does not show the full picture, and 2) will take ages to parse.
So hypothetically, if a content creator went to the Amsterdam event (which is not only a possibility but likely) and was therefore unable to grind the event hard during that time because they were creating content regarding the in-person event, the method of looking at the prior week would show they were 'a freeloader who doesn't play ESO.' Despite 'playing ESO' being their literal job.
What about people who did grind the style pages hard in the first week, so they really didn't go farming boxes because they wanted to get the pages done. And then as soon as they got the pages done, they would obviously no longer grind for the pages, but would do other things? I'm in that boat.
Your entire argument is based on teetering fallacies, mostly involving "I know one person, so I'm just going to assume all people are like that." However, I'm sure that anyone can tell you that we are all different. And I'm sure that any of us will also say that we may change out playstyle from week to week depending on what's going on.
And as to the time spent - how much longer should we be locked out? An audit like that would take ages, so are we supposed to stay locked out until they stop being busy and have time to audit who's "worthy" and who's not? They won't stop being busy until after the Chapter releases, so you think it's acceptable to wait until then? And if that seems too long, how would you propose to minimize the time? Again, this blockout has gone on for 8 days so far, and will continue for at least 3 more.
And as I've said: I know people who have gotten temp bans for reason that were not blocked from playing this long.
Again, you seem very hung up on the idea that most of the players caught in this "were not playing the game on Live" because you know someone personally. I get that. I (as did everyone who contributed to the PTS last cycle) told ZOS then that the combination of drop rates and bound pages was a recipe for disaster, and I'm sure that it would have made this a lot less antagonistic if they had listened to us then.
But consider: is it worth it to overcompensate people, or to underdeliver? Especially in light of the fact that the biggest faces of marketing this game are disproportionally affected.
I know that I (and most of the other locked accounts) would rather have been able to play instead of what they're offerring as compensation. Maybe there is a way you could ask support to ban your account and then include you in the rollbacks, so you lose 8 days of account progress and all of the stuff you got since Monday, but then at least you'll be able to get the pages for free.
Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
It sounds like you're mad about one particular person. Maybe you should just block them so you don't have to hear them talk about it?
Nein, it's just a matter of being fair with the players that really collaborated in the PTS and did their stuff on the Live servers, against players that did nothing at all on neither of both servers.
Compensation shuould have been provided based on activity, participation and actions.
DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
It sounds like you're mad about one particular person. Maybe you should just block them so you don't have to hear them talk about it?
Nein, it's just a matter of being fair with the players that really collaborated in the PTS and did their stuff on the Live servers, against players that did nothing at all on neither of both servers.
Compensation shuould have been provided based on activity, participation and actions.
If you aren't someone who was locked out, why do you care? I was farming boxes for hours a day right up until I got my account locked out. No, I do not care if someone didn't touch the event and had no intention to gets the same compensation (not a reward, different words mean different things). The implication you're giving that it's unfair for both people to get the same compensation in your example relies on it being unfair for the person who farmed the event and gave feedback on the PTS.
Well, as someone who did farm the event and the main reason I didn't give feedback was that I didn't get a chance to (locked out 3 minutes after logging into the PTS), I don't find it unfair at all. It's not a zero sum game like you seem to view it as. They get compensation, I get compensation, and neither of us lose out because of the other, only for ZOS's screw-up.
It's really that simple. It isn't a zero sum game, it isn't "unfair" for me because I'd get the same compensation either way, and there's no sense in stoking resentment between people who were both affected, in some way or another, by ZOS's mess. It doesn't matter if they were affected less than me due to their own personal choices, what matters is that it affected them. Period. This is such a pointless argument to make if you aren't even one of the people locked out, and if you are then I ask what you gain from it.
Dragonnord wrote: »By checking the logs of the affected players, just as code65536 stated and suggested in this same thread (you can go a page back and check).
Dragonnord wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
It sounds like you're mad about one particular person. Maybe you should just block them so you don't have to hear them talk about it?
Nein, it's just a matter of being fair with the players that really collaborated in the PTS and did their stuff on the Live servers, against players that did nothing at all on neither of both servers.
Compensation shuould have been provided based on activity, participation and actions.
If you aren't someone who was locked out, why do you care? I was farming boxes for hours a day right up until I got my account locked out. No, I do not care if someone didn't touch the event and had no intention to gets the same compensation (not a reward, different words mean different things). The implication you're giving that it's unfair for both people to get the same compensation in your example relies on it being unfair for the person who farmed the event and gave feedback on the PTS.
Well, as someone who did farm the event and the main reason I didn't give feedback was that I didn't get a chance to (locked out 3 minutes after logging into the PTS), I don't find it unfair at all. It's not a zero sum game like you seem to view it as. They get compensation, I get compensation, and neither of us lose out because of the other, only for ZOS's screw-up.
It's really that simple. It isn't a zero sum game, it isn't "unfair" for me because I'd get the same compensation either way, and there's no sense in stoking resentment between people who were both affected, in some way or another, by ZOS's mess. It doesn't matter if they were affected less than me due to their own personal choices, what matters is that it affected them. Period. This is such a pointless argument to make if you aren't even one of the people locked out, and if you are then I ask what you gain from it.
Why do you care that I care?
DerAlleinTiger wrote: »And before you even try to deny it, there are only two logical purposes for your continued advocacy of reducing the compensation for those people in question: Either you are attempting to advocate on behalf of those who participated in the event and got locked out, in which case we evidently don't want you to and do not agree going off the previous posts, or it is an expression of personal envy you're trying to dilute under the guise of advocating for fairness, which I'd rather not assume without admission and so I write under presumption of the former.
Dragonnord wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »And before you even try to deny it, there are only two logical purposes for your continued advocacy of reducing the compensation for those people in question: Either you are attempting to advocate on behalf of those who participated in the event and got locked out, in which case we evidently don't want you to and do not agree going off the previous posts, or it is an expression of personal envy you're trying to dilute under the guise of advocating for fairness, which I'd rather not assume without admission and so I write under presumption of the former.
Wrong, I advocate for no one, it's just my opinion and you should take it or leave it as it is.
And please don't care that much for what I opine or believe is fair or unfair, as I will continue to provide my opinion in these forums, regardless.
DerAlleinTiger wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »DerAlleinTiger wrote: »And before you even try to deny it, there are only two logical purposes for your continued advocacy of reducing the compensation for those people in question: Either you are attempting to advocate on behalf of those who participated in the event and got locked out, in which case we evidently don't want you to and do not agree going off the previous posts, or it is an expression of personal envy you're trying to dilute under the guise of advocating for fairness, which I'd rather not assume without admission and so I write under presumption of the former.
Wrong, I advocate for no one, it's just my opinion and you should take it or leave it as it is.
And please don't care that much for what I opine or believe is fair or unfair, as I will continue to provide my opinion in these forums, regardless.
With that attitude, I'll gladly leave it behind as it should be.
HatchetHaro wrote: »The only truly fair way to compensate the affected players is to re-enable the Anniversary Jubilee event for 10 days that only they can participate in, along with reimbursing them with the missed daily rewards, Seals of Endeavour, and lost mail.
If they can do that, they'd get rid of 99% of the complaints about the lock-out.
HatchetHaro wrote: »The only truly fair way to compensate the affected players is to re-enable the Anniversary Jubilee event for 10 days that only they can participate in, along with reimbursing them with the missed daily rewards, Seals of Endeavour, and lost mail.
If they can do that, they'd get rid of 99% of the complaints about the lock-out.
That would still not be a compensation for being unable to log into their accounts.
Also, since it is only a small percentage of the playerbase, farming geysirs etc would probably take a lot longer than surfing with a zerg 24/7.
Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »
[Snip]
I AM NOT AGAINST THE BANNED PLAYERS, have you read my posts?
I even said "I'm glad and happy the players that deserved the rewards got them, I applaud that", I said several times already that I found not fair for other players, players I know WERE NOT going to play Live and do the event, nor farm the style pages nor care for doing endeavors, etc. and that went a minute to the PTS because nothing, because they were bored and did nothing there, they tested nothing, they provided zero feedback and are now celebrating that they got FULL rewards for doing nothing at all, nothing in the PTS and nothing on the Live server.
I'd like to point out they're not being rewarded, they're being compensated. As I explained in another post, a reward is what you get for a service, whereas compensation is meant to make up for loss suffered.
Rewarded, compensated, gifted, call it whatever, my point remains on those players I know that were not doing and did nothing at all, neither on the PTS nor on the Live servers.
As I mentioned, one of them is in one of my guilds and celebrates free stuff for doing nothing on neither of both servers.
It sounds like you're mad about one particular person. Maybe you should just block them so you don't have to hear them talk about it?
Nein, it's just a matter of being fair with the players that really collaborated in the PTS and did their stuff on the Live servers, against players that did nothing at all on neither of both servers.
Compensation shuould have been provided based on activity, participation and actions.
HatchetHaro wrote: »The only truly fair way to compensate the affected players is to re-enable the Anniversary Jubilee event for 10 days that only they can participate in, along with reimbursing them with the missed daily rewards, Seals of Endeavour, and lost mail.
If they can do that, they'd get rid of 99% of the complaints about the lock-out.
That would still not be a compensation for being unable to log into their accounts.
Also, since it is only a small percentage of the playerbase, farming geysirs etc would probably take a lot longer than surfing with a zerg 24/7.
Anachronian wrote: »TBH, I'm just hoping that they manage to restore us by Thursday or Friday this week.
I still remember being locked out from RuneScape from something similar from March 4 through April 9.