edward_frigidhands wrote: »Unarmed combat being equal in any way to armed combat makes no sense.
edward_frigidhands wrote: »Unarmed combat being equal in any way to armed combat makes no sense.
Yes. It would be.
Fantasy settings still have rules. What isn't explicitly fantastic works as we know it. Verisimilitude must be maintained.
If it actively incorporated magic an argument can be made. If not, you just get your hands chopped off. We know this works this way because people in Tamriel do in fact use swords to chop off things made of skin and flesh.
So we're talking about extremely heavy gauntlets + bracers only unarmed combat?
Because I don't think that's what people want from such a skill line.
The D&D monk is filled with supernatural abilities to the brim.
You are also misrepresenting what I said entirely, and I don't feel particularly inclined to continue a discussion filled with hyperbole.
Fantasy is never an excuse to abandon all verisimilitude. It's a cop-out.