I think i'd prefer them not to try and encourage us watching streams we have no interest in.
Add the free gems as days 29-31 each month for the login rewards since it's better engagement having players log in every day than fake watch a stream. (I got a nice Senche from the last crate, however I'd be perfectly content not having to leave my phone on for 8 hours pretending to watch a stream I don't have any inclination to watch instead).
HelixUnited wrote: »Working as intended,
drops are great I won at Snap from today's free ones
Aardappelboom wrote: »Well, handing out free crates to give a taste of "gambling joy" in the hopes people will spend money is pretty questionable tbh. That the rewards are lackluster is even more questionable, for some people getting nothing feeds the need to buy one more than getting something, which is just a very low thing to do as a business.
These things are regulated in Belgium, it's just not allowed. Sad to see it's still active in the US and other countries.
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »Aardappelboom wrote: »Well, handing out free crates to give a taste of "gambling joy" in the hopes people will spend money is pretty questionable tbh. That the rewards are lackluster is even more questionable, for some people getting nothing feeds the need to buy one more than getting something, which is just a very low thing to do as a business.
These things are regulated in Belgium, it's just not allowed. Sad to see it's still active in the US and other countries.
Agree. I've pulled mates back from the brink of poker machine addictions - gambling is far more prevalent and destructive than any substance abuse issues I've ever seen. (not discounting the massive impact of substance abuse across the world - in before the trolls)
Unless there are a few dozen idiotic whales keeping the current system afloat (not that unrealistic, unfortunately), the ZoS revenue stream team need to solidly rethink their career. The actual player base would spend infinitely more if they could just buy what they wanted directly.
As to the rest of you "don't you realise these are free crates" ...umm yeh I do...they are still crates though, hey. If I got some sick gear I'd have already restocked and spent my crowns, and I refuse to believe I am alone in that.
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »Aardappelboom wrote: »Well, handing out free crates to give a taste of "gambling joy" in the hopes people will spend money is pretty questionable tbh. That the rewards are lackluster is even more questionable, for some people getting nothing feeds the need to buy one more than getting something, which is just a very low thing to do as a business.
These things are regulated in Belgium, it's just not allowed. Sad to see it's still active in the US and other countries.
Agree. I've pulled mates back from the brink of poker machine addictions - gambling is far more prevalent and destructive than any substance abuse issues I've ever seen. (not discounting the massive impact of substance abuse across the world - in before the trolls)
Unless there are a few dozen idiotic whales keeping the current system afloat (not that unrealistic, unfortunately), the ZoS revenue stream team need to solidly rethink their career. The actual player base would spend infinitely more if they could just buy what they wanted directly.
As to the rest of you "don't you realise these are free crates" ...umm yeh I do...they are still crates though, hey. If I got some sick gear I'd have already restocked and spent my crowns, and I refuse to believe I am alone in that.
Do you honestly think, if these points were true and they'd make more sales doing it your way, they would choose to do it the way it currently is?
The fact is, they maximize revenue with the current model. It's been tested and proven since the birth of micro transactions. If you think you know more than multi-million dollar corporations, Microsoft, and hundreds of people with business and economics degrees... Why do you think that?
Perhaps the biggest concern is that they give out 'crates'.
Regardless of how or why, perhaps they simply need to re-brand them as 'Crown Satchels'.
It'd be fairly simple for them to consider having 3 cards drop in a satchel, which offer the following:
1st card is always a number of Crown Gems. Mostly 5, but sometimes 10 (maybe even a special 25 one)
2nd card offers one of the following: 50 tri-stat pots, 10 crown meals, 5 crown repair kits or the Pet/Mount.
3rd card offers crafting materials - Heartwood, Mundane Runes etc (25/50) and sometimes the latest special item (aka 5 stendarr stamps)
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »Hahah literally every response here proves my point.
[snip] if these crates are 'not real crown crates'. They are 100% showing prospective crown crate purchasers a negative view of their chances.
[snip] they would know that these Ourobrois crates should drop BETTER rewards than a basic crown crate.
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot!
[edited for bashing & profanity bypass]
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »If you genii wanted to sell more crowns/crown crates, you'd have [snip] weighted the free twitch drops to give some decent rewards. Why would I spend, what...$10...$20 AUD on a crate that gives me this?
The last free crates were the same. The crates I bought have rarely been better. I get RNGs and stuff, but [snip] you'd think they would learn to actually [snip] make the free drops look awesome?
[edited for bashing]
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »Aardappelboom wrote: »Well, handing out free crates to give a taste of "gambling joy" in the hopes people will spend money is pretty questionable tbh. That the rewards are lackluster is even more questionable, for some people getting nothing feeds the need to buy one more than getting something, which is just a very low thing to do as a business.
These things are regulated in Belgium, it's just not allowed. Sad to see it's still active in the US and other countries.
Agree. I've pulled mates back from the brink of poker machine addictions - gambling is far more prevalent and destructive than any substance abuse issues I've ever seen. (not discounting the massive impact of substance abuse across the world - in before the trolls)
Unless there are a few dozen idiotic whales keeping the current system afloat (not that unrealistic, unfortunately), the ZoS revenue stream team need to solidly rethink their career. The actual player base would spend infinitely more if they could just buy what they wanted directly.
As to the rest of you "don't you realise these are free crates" ...umm yeh I do...they are still crates though, hey. If I got some sick gear I'd have already restocked and spent my crowns, and I refuse to believe I am alone in that.
Do you honestly think, if these points were true and they'd make more sales doing it your way, they would choose to do it the way it currently is?
The fact is, they maximize revenue with the current model. It's been tested and proven since the birth of micro transactions. If you think you know more than multi-million dollar corporations, Microsoft, and hundreds of people with business and economics degrees... Why do you think that?
I don't doubt they make money doing what they are doing. Like you say, they;d clearly change it otherwise.
My point is that very simplistic, short term thinking alienates their player base, loses potential customers, and makes them look toxic and greedy as heck.
Have they tested a direct purchase model? Not in my time. The income might be good, but who knows if it could be better? Moreover, imagine being a company that people got behind instead of always ragging on because they just wanted to juice us?
if your short term profits are perpetually maximized, then your long term profits are logically maximized too.
But that's how business has been done since some greedy person realized they could squeeze just a little more profit... Then a little more... And so on.
It's upsetting and lame, but blaming a single company for adhering to principles that have governed for-profit businesses since time immemorial isn't exactly fair, and not very useful, as fundamental change would be required to effect how things are done.
I admit I don't crates at all but isn't that perfectly normal result from a free twitch crate? People who bother with twitch crates do it because gems unless I'm mistaken.
This and they are very valuable because the crown gems get more expensive as they get higher in tires. Seals on the other hand get relatively cheaper as you move up.tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »The Twitch crates are just meant to give you gems. I save them up and buy what I want from crates instead of gambling on them.

rootkitronin wrote: »if your short term profits are perpetually maximized, then your long term profits are logically maximized too.
I understand where you're coming from here - but that's just not true, and saying so is oversimplifying a very complicated concept.But that's how business has been done since some greedy person realized they could squeeze just a little more profit... Then a little more... And so on.
No, it hasn't. There are plenty of business out there that are ethical and don't rely on exploitation or predatory marketing. To say that's just always how it's been done is not only incorrect, but it serves as an excuse to normalize poor business behavior and practices.It's upsetting and lame, but blaming a single company for adhering to principles that have governed for-profit businesses since time immemorial isn't exactly fair, and not very useful, as fundamental change would be required to effect how things are done.
It is absolutely fair - ZOS is the company, these are their forums, this is their product, we are their customers. They are the only company that is remotely relevant in the context of these conversations and criticisms.
You're propping up an inaccurate example of how businesses work and comparing ZOS to them, essentially saying it's not their fault because of example - that's not useful.
How is it inaccurate?
Given the robustness of crate sales and the relatively few complaints, this seems unlikely.
I'm not saying it's not worth complaining, or that it's not right to point out the problems, simply that it's not worth getting steamed over some very predictable practices resulting from our horrible economic system.
HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »HerrKeinTipp_MrNoTip wrote: »Aardappelboom wrote: »Well, handing out free crates to give a taste of "gambling joy" in the hopes people will spend money is pretty questionable tbh. That the rewards are lackluster is even more questionable, for some people getting nothing feeds the need to buy one more than getting something, which is just a very low thing to do as a business.
These things are regulated in Belgium, it's just not allowed. Sad to see it's still active in the US and other countries.
Agree. I've pulled mates back from the brink of poker machine addictions - gambling is far more prevalent and destructive than any substance abuse issues I've ever seen. (not discounting the massive impact of substance abuse across the world - in before the trolls)
Unless there are a few dozen idiotic whales keeping the current system afloat (not that unrealistic, unfortunately), the ZoS revenue stream team need to solidly rethink their career. The actual player base would spend infinitely more if they could just buy what they wanted directly.
As to the rest of you "don't you realise these are free crates" ...umm yeh I do...they are still crates though, hey. If I got some sick gear I'd have already restocked and spent my crowns, and I refuse to believe I am alone in that.
Do you honestly think, if these points were true and they'd make more sales doing it your way, they would choose to do it the way it currently is?
The fact is, they maximize revenue with the current model. It's been tested and proven since the birth of micro transactions. If you think you know more than multi-million dollar corporations, Microsoft, and hundreds of people with business and economics degrees... Why do you think that?
I don't doubt they make money doing what they are doing. Like you say, they;d clearly change it otherwise.
My point is that very simplistic, short term thinking alienates their player base, loses potential customers, and makes them look toxic and greedy as heck.
Have they tested a direct purchase model? Not in my time. The income might be good, but who knows if it could be better? Moreover, imagine being a company that people got behind instead of always ragging on because they just wanted to juice us?