Druid's braid would be better if it was tri stats for the last 3 so that you're not "punished" on max stam for using a mythic.
Personally I think it would be better overall if it was tri stats all the way down, increasing in power from 5pc on, but maybe that's just me.
I'm really happy this sets exists, it gives me hope that we might see something outside the 5pc / 3pc / 2pc sets we currently have, especially as crafted sets, but damn that made this one boring.
tsaescishoeshiner wrote: »It would make sense if the 6-10 piece bonuses were buffed to match the benefit of a second 5-piece set, and the 11-12 piece bonuses were buffed to compete with a monster set or mythic. A lot of stam & magicka recovery on the last 2 pieces could be nice.
This sounds like a really fantastic idea. I wouldn't mind if the first three lines were still hp, mag, and stam in that order and then it switched to ramping tri-stats the rest of the way. This way it doesn't purely outshine the tri-stat or bi-stat monster sets.Druid's braid would be better if it was tri stats for the last 3 so that you're not "punished" on max stam for using a mythic.
Personally I think it would be better overall if it was tri stats all the way down, increasing in power from 5pc on, but maybe that's just me.
I'm really happy this sets exists, it gives me hope that we might see something outside the 5pc / 3pc / 2pc sets we currently have, especially as crafted sets, but damn that made this one boring.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »What are the new values?
Crafting station is on Amenos.MashmalloMan wrote: »Can we get specifics? I have no idea where the crafting station is.
Imo, the first 2-4 pieces should match any other set so Trainee still has its place.
I won't comment on the rest as I haven't seen the scaling.
PeacefulAnarchy wrote: »xylena_lazarow wrote: »What are the new values?Crafting station is on Amenos.MashmalloMan wrote: »Can we get specifics? I have no idea where the crafting station is.
Imo, the first 2-4 pieces should match any other set so Trainee still has its place.
I won't comment on the rest as I haven't seen the scaling.
Gold:
1206,1096,1096,1206, then 1565,1565,1722 repeat
MashmalloMan wrote: »Druid's braid would be better if it was tri stats for the last 3 so that you're not "punished" on max stam for using a mythic.
Personally I think it would be better overall if it was tri stats all the way down, increasing in power from 5pc on, but maybe that's just me.
I'm really happy this sets exists, it gives me hope that we might see something outside the 5pc / 3pc / 2pc sets we currently have, especially as crafted sets, but damn that made this one boring.
That is a fantastic idea.
I was pretty disappointed that the 2 piece was mag like Trainee.. doesn't seem like they gave the context of their own gear any thought. Theres no reason for a Stam player to invest 2 into either of these, they need to go 1 or at least 3, while mag can do 1+1 or 2+2, etc.
5piece + onward, you're committed and should be rewarded for every piece you get instead of having to hit milestones for the stat you care about.
Necrotech_Master wrote: »well this change certainly makes this set way less useful
doing a quick calculation of total stat gain with this set pre/post changes:
pre-change:
- max hp: 6160
- max stam: 5604
- max mag: 5604
post change:
- max hp: 5856 (change of -304)
- max stam: 5791 (change of +187)
- max mag: 5791 (change of +187)
so in total, its slightly more mag/stam, but slightly less hp, but because the pieces 1-3 are so low now, there is no point trying to use this as a filler unless you want to double dip into hp with 1pc trainee + 1 pc of druids, but if you wanted the 1-2 pc filler set, trainee is still going to be far better
MashmalloMan wrote: »Necrotech_Master wrote: »well this change certainly makes this set way less useful
doing a quick calculation of total stat gain with this set pre/post changes:
pre-change:
- max hp: 6160
- max stam: 5604
- max mag: 5604
post change:
- max hp: 5856 (change of -304)
- max stam: 5791 (change of +187)
- max mag: 5791 (change of +187)
so in total, its slightly more mag/stam, but slightly less hp, but because the pieces 1-3 are so low now, there is no point trying to use this as a filler unless you want to double dip into hp with 1pc trainee + 1 pc of druids, but if you wanted the 1-2 pc filler set, trainee is still going to be far better
Basically.
For mag, 2x trainee trumps 1x/1x because you can just move stats around.
For stam, 1x trainee/1x braid is really the only option, can't convert your off resource.
An example of where this is viable:
- 5x set active all the time
- 2x ability altering weapons front
- 2x ability altering weapons back
- 1x jewelry mythic
- 2x monster set
This leaves 2 spaces, you can put 1x trainee chest, 1x Druid Jewelry. It ends up as more stat density than something like 2x Agility or Endurance Jewelry.
Okay, you got me on the style thing. But are you really gonna throw away gold gear for 116 more hp? Besides, some of us do in fact wear it as a 2 and 3 pieces, which is where trainee made up the difference if you wanted to count it as such. As well, some of us were considering it as a second hp filler, a role it is now basically unfit for. Regardless, I even said myself in the description above that I don't have a problem with it starting slightly lower than trainee for the first three lines but with the new changes it's not even worth it for another filler at that point. And regardless of the changes wearing additional pieces is still as bad an idea as it was before the change.
They had the right intention but as usual missed the mark by considering it numerically on a spreadsheet rather than practically through gameplay.
Necrotech_Master wrote: »well this change certainly makes this set way less useful
doing a quick calculation of total stat gain with this set pre/post changes:
pre-change:
- max hp: 6160
- max stam: 5604
- max mag: 5604
post change:
- max hp: 5856 (change of -304)
- max stam: 5791 (change of +187)
- max mag: 5791 (change of +187)
so in total, its slightly more mag/stam, but slightly less hp, but because the pieces 1-3 are so low now, there is no point trying to use this as a filler unless you want to double dip into hp with 1pc trainee + 1 pc of druids, but if you wanted the 1-2 pc filler set, trainee is still going to be far better
the1andonlyskwex wrote: »Necrotech_Master wrote: »well this change certainly makes this set way less useful
doing a quick calculation of total stat gain with this set pre/post changes:
pre-change:
- max hp: 6160
- max stam: 5604
- max mag: 5604
post change:
- max hp: 5856 (change of -304)
- max stam: 5791 (change of +187)
- max mag: 5791 (change of +187)
so in total, its slightly more mag/stam, but slightly less hp, but because the pieces 1-3 are so low now, there is no point trying to use this as a filler unless you want to double dip into hp with 1pc trainee + 1 pc of druids, but if you wanted the 1-2 pc filler set, trainee is still going to be far better
Druid's Braid isn't supposed to be a filler set. It's supposed to be a set where you equip 6+ pieces.
I don't really have an opinion on whether the 6-12 piece bonuses are enough to make it viable, but I think it makes sense for 1-3 to be weaker than Trainee, and 4-5 to be weaker than normal 5 piece sets.
Druid's braid would be better if it was tri stats for the last 3 so that you're not "punished" on max stam for using a mythic.
Personally I think it would be better overall if it was tri stats all the way down, increasing in power from 5pc on, but maybe that's just me.
I'm really happy this sets exists, it gives me hope that we might see something outside the 5pc / 3pc / 2pc sets we currently have, especially as crafted sets, but damn that made this one boring.
the1andonlyskwex wrote: »Way too many people in this thread are missing the obvious (and dev stated) intent of this set.
It's not supposed to be a filler that you squeeze in around your mythic, monster, and 5 piece sets as some sort of 5-2-1-4 scheme. It's a set that is specifically designed to be worn with 6+ pieces, while being worse than alternatives with 5 or less pieces.
The 1-4 piece bonuses are bad by design, not by some failure of balance by the devs. The metric we should be judging it by is whether the 1 through 10 piece bonuses are cumulatively good enough to be better than two separate 5 piece sets.
That said, even by an appropriate metric I think the set has issues with being too unfocused. The total stats provided are fine, but they're spread so thin across health, magicka, and stamina that the resulting build isn't really competitive anywhere.
@the1andonlyskwex then it should give at more stats than raw 5/10/12 set pieces that just provide raw stats.
Why more? Because generally there is no point in going both pools.
Shacklebreaker 5pc gives more pools combined than any narrow pool set, like Alfiq.
Ideally also give tristat every level, because giving magicka first is unfair for stam.
the1andonlyskwex wrote: »Way too many people in this thread are missing the obvious (and dev stated) intent of this set.
It's not supposed to be a filler that you squeeze in around your mythic, monster, and 5 piece sets as some sort of 5-2-1-4 scheme. It's a set that is specifically designed to be worn with 6+ pieces, while being worse than alternatives with 5 or less pieces.
The 1-4 piece bonuses are bad by design, not by some failure of balance by the devs. The metric we should be judging it by is whether the 1 through 10 piece bonuses are cumulatively good enough to be better than two separate 5 piece sets.
That said, even by an appropriate metric I think the set has issues with being too unfocused. The total stats provided are fine, but they're spread so thin across health, magicka, and stamina that the resulting build isn't really competitive anywhere.