TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
TheEndBringer wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
Are you making the "teabagging is friendly and not insulting" argument? Do we need to have that talk?
VaranisArano wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
Are you making the "teabagging is friendly and not insulting" argument? Do we need to have that talk?
It can be friendly. My guild used to teabag each other in good fun when we died in raid. There's also a lot of times when we'd laugh about getting teabagged by enemy players we knew because it's entirely possible to be insulting each other in good fun in a competition like Cyrodiil. It certainly can be good-natured trash talk in context.
ZOS' stance on teabagging being fine in general reflects that.
But I do think it's pretty obvious where ZOS has drawn the line. Once we've been asked not to teabag someone, it's clearly not in good fun to continue doing so. Its no longer harmless, and the person who risks being banned by continuing to do so knows that full well. Because of that, I think it's totally fine to put maliciously continuing to teabag someone after having been asked to stop on the same level as the other forms of harassment - which is what ZOS does.
TheEndBringer wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
Are you making the "teabagging is friendly and not insulting" argument? Do we need to have that talk?
It can be friendly. My guild used to teabag each other in good fun when we died in raid. There's also a lot of times when we'd laugh about getting teabagged by enemy players we knew because it's entirely possible to be insulting each other in good fun in a competition like Cyrodiil. It certainly can be good-natured trash talk in context.
ZOS' stance on teabagging being fine in general reflects that.
But I do think it's pretty obvious where ZOS has drawn the line. Once we've been asked not to teabag someone, it's clearly not in good fun to continue doing so. Its no longer harmless, and the person who risks being banned by continuing to do so knows that full well. Because of that, I think it's totally fine to put maliciously continuing to teabag someone after having been asked to stop on the same level as the other forms of harassment - which is what ZOS does.
My friends and I would okay slug bug as kids. Doesn't mean if I punched another person in the arm they had to laugh and it.
We're taking about the animated personification of placing *** on someone's face. It isn't "friendly" if you're doing it to a complete stranger after running them down with your buddies. Whether you consider it toxic or not doesn't matter. If someone asks you not to do it, and you continue, that is toxic.
TheEndBringer wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
Are you making the "teabagging is friendly and not insulting" argument? Do we need to have that talk?
TheEndBringer wrote: »TheEndBringer wrote: »I think its toxic and bad for the game that people can get banned for teabagging. I bet this rule came about because some pvers got bagged and had a cry to the devs. Maybe it was that wonderful lady on the dev stream that told pvpers to leave the game.
Meanwhile, there are people actually cheating and abusing game mechanics and its almost impossible to get them banned. Priorities are messed up imo.
Both can be wrong.
No. Cheating is always wrong, teabagging is completely harmless. Just to be clear, I think extremely insulting hate whispers should be a bannable, people should not have to be exposed to that kind of thing. However, making "teabagging" a bannable offense just gives a tool for toxic players to hurt other people in the game. I think it is absolutely crazy that it has been put on the same level as cheating or insulting hate tells. Honestly couldn't believe it when I first heard about it.
Are you making the "teabagging is friendly and not insulting" argument? Do we need to have that talk?
I am saying how you interpret it is in your own head and that any player has complete control to respawn if they don't want to see it. This is completely different to someone that sends you hate whispers and should be recognized as such.
TheEndBringer wrote: »Tea bagging is not friendly or respectful.
TheEndBringer wrote: »Tea bagging is not friendly or respectful.
Neither is pvp... I assume you'll be protesting boxing, football, UFC etc etc as well to ensure they are all daisies and polite to eachother as well before and after matches?
I just got t-bagged last night on a BG. It happens when you kill someone who thinks they are good, and they chase you all match until they finally kill you with people helping them, and can't resist to t-bag you. Meanwhile they lost the match for their team while I was busy protecting the chaosball carrier.
Funny story, was watching a typical PVP streamer who of course was treating capture relic as DM. And of course he was a cheesiest NB cloak spammer you can imagine. Anyway he came up to a DK guarding a relic and fought for a few minutes almost dying 3 times while neve getting DK below 50. Then some others came, and the DK got chase behind a wall and died, not from NB but someone else. Anyway, the NB couldn't resist, he had to run over having not killed the DK, even in a group of enemies and TBagged the DK. That's not all....
What preceded to happen was hilarious. The NB streamer, either kept chasing the DK or the DK kept finding him but the DK killed the NB over and over like 4-5 in a row. It was hilarious. Moral of story be careful who you T-Bag. Funny thing is the DK never once T-Bagged back.
gariondavey wrote: »I just got t-bagged last night on a BG. It happens when you kill someone who thinks they are good, and they chase you all match until they finally kill you with people helping them, and can't resist to t-bag you. Meanwhile they lost the match for their team while I was busy protecting the chaosball carrier.
Funny story, was watching a typical PVP streamer who of course was treating capture relic as DM. And of course he was a cheesiest NB cloak spammer you can imagine. Anyway he came up to a DK guarding a relic and fought for a few minutes almost dying 3 times while neve getting DK below 50. Then some others came, and the DK got chase behind a wall and died, not from NB but someone else. Anyway, the NB couldn't resist, he had to run over having not killed the DK, even in a group of enemies and TBagged the DK. That's not all....
What preceded to happen was hilarious. The NB streamer, either kept chasing the DK or the DK kept finding him but the DK killed the NB over and over like 4-5 in a row. It was hilarious. Moral of story be careful who you T-Bag. Funny thing is the DK never once T-Bagged back.
What does the streamer's name rhyme with?
Let me start out with saying I get T-bagged all the time. It doesn't bother me. There are other emotes you can do, which are more entertaining in my opening.
There have been a few times where it seems unnecessary where I wanted to actually message the person, but ultimately didn't.
This one comes to mind and is rather recent.
I was flipping a flag at Bruma solo and got ganked by a NB only to survive the initial gank and then ultimately beat him. His 5 buddies came up and then proceeded to beat me. They res the NB who immediately runs over and starts T-bagging me. Dude, you didn't even win the fight, but yet you feel the need to T-Bag and the only reason I'm lying here dead is because your 5 buddies came running over.
Let me start out with saying I get T-bagged all the time. It doesn't bother me. There are other emotes you can do, which are more entertaining in my opening.
There have been a few times where it seems unnecessary where I wanted to actually message the person, but ultimately didn't.
This one comes to mind and is rather recent.
I was flipping a flag at Bruma solo and got ganked by a NB only to survive the initial gank and then ultimately beat him. His 5 buddies came up and then proceeded to beat me. They res the NB who immediately runs over and starts T-bagging me. Dude, you didn't even win the fight, but yet you feel the need to T-Bag and the only reason I'm lying here dead is because your 5 buddies came running over.
You should feel happy when you get teabagged like this. Either the other player is just poking some light-hearted fun at you, or they got so frustrated at not being able to kill you that you basically became a raid boss in their mind that required a whole group to take down.
Jamie_Aubrey wrote: »Mass guild report seems to work
Source: I got perma banned after a full 12 man guild tbagged me so I tbagged one of them back and got banned for it
ResidentContrarian wrote: »Jamie_Aubrey wrote: »Mass guild report seems to work
Source: I got perma banned after a full 12 man guild tbagged me so I tbagged one of them back and got banned for it
If true, that is so, so, incredibly sad. Also, hi.
Jamie_Aubrey wrote: »Mass guild report seems to work
Source: I got perma banned after a full 12 man guild tbagged me so I tbagged one of them back and got banned for it
Jamie_Aubrey wrote: »Mass guild report seems to work
Source: I got perma banned after a full 12 man guild tbagged me so I tbagged one of them back and got banned for it
This is a good example of why it shouldn't be a bannable offense.