There is nothing in the crown store that determines the outcome of the game. Nothing is being forced on any of us. When the game dropped requiring a subscription to play that revenue had to be generated through other means. That is why we have the crown store. It isn't predatory it is just there for your convenience. You are comparing ESO a game that has no monthly subscription to games that do have monthly subscriptions. If you are going to do that then you have to consider that all the DLCs in ESO come with the subscription. Essentially compared to the other games this is free content.
Crown crates are not gambling. You know the minimum number of items to expect from each crate just like packs of sports cards or any number of other things that do not fall under the definition of gambling. They can affect people with tendencies towards a gambling addiction just as actual gambling can but they are not gambling.
And there is no pay to win. There is pay for convenience. My crafting bag has never once kept me alive in Imperial City.
Sheezabeast wrote: »If Imperials had the best racials in the game, the food from the store had the best stats, the potions had the best stats, soul gems and repair kits were expensive in game and hard to obtain, making the ones in the store mandatory, and homes of equal player occupancy not available for gold purchase, and crown for gold trading not being allowed, then yes, I would agree.
But not one of those things are true.
Chips_Ahoy wrote: »There is nothing in the crown store that determines the outcome of the game. Nothing is being forced on any of us. When the game dropped requiring a subscription to play that revenue had to be generated through other means. That is why we have the crown store. It isn't predatory it is just there for your convenience. You are comparing ESO a game that has no monthly subscription to games that do have monthly subscriptions. If you are going to do that then you have to consider that all the DLCs in ESO come with the subscription. Essentially compared to the other games this is free content.
Crown crates are not gambling. You know the minimum number of items to expect from each crate just like packs of sports cards or any number of other things that do not fall under the definition of gambling. They can affect people with tendencies towards a gambling addiction just as actual gambling can but they are not gambling.
And there is no pay to win. There is pay for convenience. My crafting bag has never once kept me alive in Imperial City.
I'm sorry, but these arguments are so tired that I'm not going to bother replying. You're wrong; they specifically hire people to prioritize the psychological manipulation of players to make them feel pressured/obligated into maximizing their spending.
Practice willpower then. You can ignore the crown store in this game far more than you can in GW2 or in BDO.
It's nothing about my own willpower. You're enabling horribly unethical behavior with that mindset.
what?
you are writing from a smartphone/pc that has components whose raw material is slave labor, and often child labor.
You're enabling horribly unethical behavior.
That's an absolutely ridiculous comparison, and you know it. To begin with, I'm not condoning or making excuses for that, which is why I said the other individual was enabling. Secondly, I'm not the one performing that unethical behavior, whereas ZOS is intentionally being unethical. We can both agree that child labor is unethical -- no one here is supporting it.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »4) False-Scarcity. This is actually illegal for many retailers, but ESO gets away with it with no issue.
Since when?
I've been surrounded by "limited time offer", "limited time sale price", "only during this event", etc... in everything from games to retail, all my life. Nothing new here. Where is this illegal?
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »4) False-Scarcity. This is actually illegal for many retailers, but ESO gets away with it with no issue.
Since when?
I've been surrounded by "limited time offer", "limited time sale price", "only during this event", etc... in everything from games to retail, all my life. Nothing new here. Where is this illegal?
Chips_Ahoy wrote: »Chips_Ahoy wrote: »There is nothing in the crown store that determines the outcome of the game. Nothing is being forced on any of us. When the game dropped requiring a subscription to play that revenue had to be generated through other means. That is why we have the crown store. It isn't predatory it is just there for your convenience. You are comparing ESO a game that has no monthly subscription to games that do have monthly subscriptions. If you are going to do that then you have to consider that all the DLCs in ESO come with the subscription. Essentially compared to the other games this is free content.
Crown crates are not gambling. You know the minimum number of items to expect from each crate just like packs of sports cards or any number of other things that do not fall under the definition of gambling. They can affect people with tendencies towards a gambling addiction just as actual gambling can but they are not gambling.
And there is no pay to win. There is pay for convenience. My crafting bag has never once kept me alive in Imperial City.
I'm sorry, but these arguments are so tired that I'm not going to bother replying. You're wrong; they specifically hire people to prioritize the psychological manipulation of players to make them feel pressured/obligated into maximizing their spending.
Practice willpower then. You can ignore the crown store in this game far more than you can in GW2 or in BDO.
It's nothing about my own willpower. You're enabling horribly unethical behavior with that mindset.
what?
you are writing from a smartphone/pc that has components whose raw material is slave labor, and often child labor.
You're enabling horribly unethical behavior.
That's an absolutely ridiculous comparison, and you know it. To begin with, I'm not condoning or making excuses for that, which is why I said the other individual was enabling. Secondly, I'm not the one performing that unethical behavior, whereas ZOS is intentionally being unethical. We can both agree that child labor is unethical -- no one here is supporting it.
exactly.
you take this too seriously, what do you hope to achieve? convince a TESO fan not to spend his money on something that you consider unethical?
If you were congruent with your words, you were respectful and tolerant with what everyone does with his money, it is theirs, not yours.
You are acting as judge and jury.
Are they questionable practices? sure, one day will they end? I doubt it, they have been around forever.
Do you want to make a change? start a campaign on social media, stop playing TESO, send a proposal to the Senate, etc.
Here you will not achieve anything, as many others have already tried.
if we are part of the system, we are part of the problem.
I think pretty much everyone disagreeing here is missing an important fact: cosmetics selling can be predatory. It just can be. What is literally the endgame of ESO? Cosmetics, and other aesthetic things. Skins, houses, armors, costumes, etc. That is literally what most endgame players play for. So yes, a cosmetic item can be predatory.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »4) False-Scarcity. This is actually illegal for many retailers, but ESO gets away with it with no issue.
Since when?
I've been surrounded by "limited time offer", "limited time sale price", "only during this event", etc... in everything from games to retail, all my life. Nothing new here. Where is this illegal?
AuraStorm43 wrote: »
Saying its “pay for convenience” ignores the fact that ESO makes things inconvenient on purpose to encourage crown store purchases
Its the same thing as “time savers” ignoring the fact the game wasted your time to encourage those purchases
YUP.
The "wasted time" is actually what keeps the game going long term. You see for an MMO to survive they need to provide new content, they need players to repeat existing content and they need players participating in a variety of content.
Chapters and DLCs take care of the new content. Gear that is good for PvP that can be gained only in PvE content and skills good for PvE that can only be gained in PvP helps get players into a variety of content and RNG takes care of repeating content. To that end I don't think they should have started selling skyshards and things like that in the crown store. They aren't idiots though. They know how to price things low enough so the players that absolutely hate what they see as the grind will purchase the shards but price them high enough most will go ahead and play the game on each character. Good for the game and all players got to choose for themselves which way to go.
AuraStorm43 wrote: »There is nothing in the crown store that determines the outcome of the game. Nothing is being forced on any of us. When the game dropped requiring a subscription to play that revenue had to be generated through other means. That is why we have the crown store. It isn't predatory it is just there for your convenience. You are comparing ESO a game that has no monthly subscription to games that do have monthly subscriptions. If you are going to do that then you have to consider that all the DLCs in ESO come with the subscription. Essentially compared to the other games this is free content.
Crown crates are not gambling. You know the minimum number of items to expect from each crate just like packs of sports cards or any number of other things that do not fall under the definition of gambling. They can affect people with tendencies towards a gambling addiction just as actual gambling can but they are not gambling.
And there is no pay to win. There is pay for convenience. My crafting bag has never once kept me alive in Imperial City.
Saying its “pay for convenience” ignores the fact that ESO makes things inconvenient on purpose to encourage crown store purchases
Its the same thing as “time savers” ignoring the fact the game wasted your time to encourage those purchases
Which of those inconveniences was not in the game at launch, when there was no Crown Store, though?There is nothing in the crown store that determines the outcome of the game. Nothing is being forced on any of us. When the game dropped requiring a subscription to play that revenue had to be generated through other means. That is why we have the crown store. It isn't predatory it is just there for your convenience. You are comparing ESO a game that has no monthly subscription to games that do have monthly subscriptions. If you are going to do that then you have to consider that all the DLCs in ESO come with the subscription. Essentially compared to the other games this is free content.
Crown crates are not gambling. You know the minimum number of items to expect from each crate just like packs of sports cards or any number of other things that do not fall under the definition of gambling. They can affect people with tendencies towards a gambling addiction just as actual gambling can but they are not gambling.
And there is no pay to win. There is pay for convenience. My crafting bag has never once kept me alive in Imperial City.
I'm sorry, but these arguments are so tired that I'm not going to bother replying. You're wrong; they specifically hire people to prioritize the psychological manipulation of players to make them feel pressured/obligated into maximizing their spending.
Practice willpower then. You can ignore the crown store in this game far more than you can in GW2 or in BDO.
It's nothing about my own willpower. I rarely ever purchase Crowns in this game. It's about the predatory and exploitative, unethical tactics that they are using. No one can contest that they are using unethical tactics; it's undeniable. You're enabling horribly unethical behavior with that mindset.
I'm not enabling it by ignoring it. I'm not falling for it. They are not getting any crowns out of me other than what I get from the subscription.
I think pretty much everyone disagreeing here is missing an important fact: cosmetics selling can be predatory. It just can be. What is literally the endgame of ESO? Cosmetics, and other aesthetic things. Skins, houses, armors, costumes, etc. That is literally what most endgame players play for. So yes, a cosmetic item can be predatory.
I think everyone disagreeing with the information presented is that they disagree. Some have made valid points that artificial scarcity is not illegal (in and of itself which is the case here) and that there is no predatory selling as at least one pointed out the design of all the games was in place well before the cash shop became a thing. Cosmetics are not required to any extent so they cannot be predatory by definition.
So while we respect that you and others have an opinion we are merely presenting our own opinion and basis for them.