When promoting, selling or supplying products, companies must give you enough accurate information to enable you to make an informed buying decision.
The second paragraph of that linked page is the cornerstone of the issue they are discussing. I have provided it below.When promoting, selling or supplying products, companies must give you enough accurate information to enable you to make an informed buying decision.
It would seem that Zenimax is providing enough accurate information as they are providing a price and how long it will be available for purchase. We also have the ability to preview most items. I do not see anything misleading of actual items for sale nor is Zenimax demonstrating aggressive behavior or any of the other items presented in that link.
Since I expect Zenimax has a number of attorneys on retainer for consultations on such matters rather than getting their legal advice from the gaming forums.
Araneae6537 wrote: »That’s a stretch, IMHO. It’s very common for things to be available or on sale for a limited time, seasonally, and so forth. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, I don’t think anyone thinks the item in question won’t be offered again, although there’s no guarantee that it will or when.
Yes, FOMO will push you toward a purchase if you’re on the fence. And? Lot’s things entice one to purchase, included being on sale. Should we disallow things ever going on sale? Being to sparkly? Forgive me, but it seems absurd.
"Only" be available for a certain time frame means it is removed from sale after that time. It does not prevent it from returning from sale after that date. There might be discussion about false advertising if it returned the following week, but nothing returns on sale for at least several months.To claim that something will "only" be available during a certain time frame, when in fact a company has made that claim about many of their other products and it has later turned out to have been false claims, surely you can see how that's false advertisement.
The second paragraph of that linked page is the cornerstone of the issue they are discussing. I have provided it below.When promoting, selling or supplying products, companies must give you enough accurate information to enable you to make an informed buying decision.
It would seem that Zenimax is providing enough accurate information as they are providing a price and how long it will be available for purchase. We also have the ability to preview most items. I do not see anything misleading of actual items for sale nor is Zenimax demonstrating aggressive behavior or any of the other items presented in that link.
Since I expect Zenimax has a number of attorneys on retainer for consultations on such matters rather than getting their legal advice from the gaming forums.
PeacefulAnarchy wrote: »"Only" be available for a certain time frame means it is removed from sale after that time. It does not prevent it from returning from sale after that date. There might be discussion about false advertising if it returned the following week, but nothing returns on sale for at least several months.To claim that something will "only" be available during a certain time frame, when in fact a company has made that claim about many of their other products and it has later turned out to have been false claims, surely you can see how that's false advertisement.
Also, their promotions don't use the word only.

zelaminator wrote: »One would think they have enough law people hired, to make sure they are within the lines.. Personally I don't even see why it's an issue
Let's hope the OP never buys seasonal things in RL like fireworks in November or Christmas trees in December! No Black Friday bargains I trust!
Aye, same hereStevieKingslayer wrote: »I personally would buy more stuff if it was available when I actually had the money to do so.
PeacefulAnarchy wrote: »"Only" be available for a certain time frame means it is removed from sale after that time. It does not prevent it from returning from sale after that date. There might be discussion about false advertising if it returned the following week, but nothing returns on sale for at least several months.To claim that something will "only" be available during a certain time frame, when in fact a company has made that claim about many of their other products and it has later turned out to have been false claims, surely you can see how that's false advertisement.
Also, their promotions don't use the word only.
Stop.
Danny_Fluke wrote: »The example you mentioned on the website shows that the limited time promotion was still available when it was checked by the buyer a week later, which could be defined as misleading. I'm no expert, but a quick look into the related directive doesn't actually specify that you cannot return an item pulled from a store again in the future, so for this part, it might rely on past precedents and/or interpretations of the legislative staff presiding over a claim in such an incident (1 week might be considered to be a breach, yet 1 year after might not). Then again, there might be actual legislature wherever you are that does specify this.
The closest example I can think of, yet possibly not applicable in terms of "traders" or "products" would be limited time availability of promotional food dishes. Restaurant A sells the dish for a month as a limited-time promotional item, after which they stop selling it again. A year later, due to popular demand, they return the dish again for another month for consumers to have it again. [snip]
That being said, I would welcome a change in how they advertise or even sell things. Even with showcases of upcoming crown store offerings, I'm sometimes hard-pressed to set aside some budget to actually buy the things because it's only about a month's worth of notice, and even then I'm not even sure if I will buy the item. Even if it weren't a permanent addition to the store, it would be nice to have it there for a little longer, maybe a couple of months. It gives time to check out and see if I really want the item seeing it in my game, as well as prepare the budget for it.
zelaminator wrote: »One would think they have enough law people hired, to make sure they are within the lines.. Personally I don't even see why it's an issue
Yes, I'm sure they make certain to operate at the very least in a grey area, and I also never claimed to believe they are directly breaking any laws, so this point you've made doesn't really relate to the topic.
The second paragraph of that linked page is the cornerstone of the issue they are discussing. I have provided it below.When promoting, selling or supplying products, companies must give you enough accurate information to enable you to make an informed buying decision.
It would seem that Zenimax is providing enough accurate information as they are providing a price and how long it will be available for purchase. We also have the ability to preview most items. I do not see anything misleading of actual items for sale nor is Zenimax demonstrating aggressive behavior or any of the other items presented in that link.
Since I expect Zenimax has a number of attorneys on retainer for consultations on such matters rather than getting their legal advice from the gaming forums.
[snip]
Marketers continually suggesting specific items will be exclusively available during a limited time, only to repeatedly prove themselves wrong on the claims by offering the same items again at later points in time, is a FOMO marketing ploy to its very core. I as a consumer of ZOS's products would like to voice my opinion that I'd rather see they didn't do that, because I find it to be rather distasteful - it's literally designed to be manipulative, and it inadvertently affects people of a certain psychological inclination negatively. I'd much rather they didn't make such claims only to prove themselves wrong on them over and over.
Zodiarkslayer wrote: »[snip]