Oh my server no CP is virtually dead. Adding another No CP campaign would be a bit silly.
Perhaps making the non alliance locked CP campaign proc free would make more sense but I'd imagine the people who choose to play in there over Grey Host would be just as annoyed as you are.
EU PC 2000+ CP professional mudballer and pie thrower"Sheggorath, you are the Skooma Cat, for what is crazier than a cat on skooma?" - Fadomai
MrMazurski wrote: »1. You are one of many people who use this forum to discharge your frustration.
2. ZOS is apparently the premises to make this change.
3. LAGS on NO-CP or CP are virtually identical. As if this was how you describe it, I think that Gray Host was just empty, and it is not unplayable.
4. MMO RPG is eternal grind, farming. btw no proc Sets are very easily accessible.
5. They do not force anyone. You still have a choice.
Yes, let's punish the players who choose to play in no-cp because they'd rather not deal with the horrible lag in the cp campaigns.
While we're at it, let's also force them to give up the proc sets that they spent many hours earning, farming, and grinding for as well.
Had you decided to add a separate campaign for No-CP, No-Proc, I'd be all for it. But forcing everyone to give up their sets and then forcing them to suffer the lag cesspool in the cp campaigns so that they can use their hard-earned proc sets is a horrible horrible decision. [snip]
[edited for bashing]
JamieAubrey wrote: »Actually we already had this a few months ago and was enjoyable
I'm for one looking forward to this
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »Ravenwatch players did not ask for this nor do most of them want it yet we are all being collectively punished to satisfy a group of players that was never larger than a vocal minority.
I look forward to the day people like you will stop speaking out for the entire community. Nobody chose you, and the only one you represent is yourself. Just look at the past, look at old topics, ask people in other polls like pvp guild etc. It's not just a bunch of flashy people. The only people screaming here are people crying about no proc.JamieAubrey wrote: »Actually we already had this a few months ago and was enjoyable
I'm for one looking forward to this
Same, but I just wish there was a separate no cp campaign with procs disabled, not my home one. I'm all for no procs, but I still think there should be options.
I think the pvp population is the key here why they didn't give it as a separate campaign. I would prefer the option, but I also think that ZOS must limit the sides it will have to balance, and everyone knows what it looks like.
PvE, PvP CP, PvP no-CP, Battlegrounds. And add another thing to that. Sounds like a stupid thought.
But i too prefer no proc. Im kinda tired dealing with sets, class which get a powerful boost from proc, like Vlaethrom 2h
I voted for add a campaign - and not for change my homecampaign.MrMazurski wrote: »here is an example of how many players are for no Cyro proc.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/562062/add-a-no-proc-set-campaign-to-cyrodiil/p1
But yes, your vote is the only one that matters.
neferpitou73 wrote: »There are two proc enabled cp campaigns why? One of which is sparsely populated I might add.
I see no reason to cannibalize Raven other than they know no-proc isn’t popular
MasterSpatula wrote: »No Volundrung, either.
Don't know what you all are complaining about. I'm already referring to this as the "cancer-free" campaign.