PeterUnlustig wrote: »There is only 1 non-CP campain and as long as it remains that way it shouldnt be locked for friends to play together.
If you prefer a locked campain there is one with a good population, where you will find enjoyment so go ahead.[/quote
i disagree i dont want to play in cp gampaigns and theres alliance change tokens now to. dont see why it cannot be locked down.
Would be nice with 2 no cp campaigns, one locked, one non locked, and then we could choose which one we prefer. And zos could collect data over a long period to see which one people prefer.
Would be nice with 2 no cp campaigns, one locked, one non locked, and then we could choose which one we prefer. And zos could collect data over a long period to see which one people prefer.
People prefer locked camps over unlocked. Look at the CP camps. Everyone was crying about them relocking the main camp, and all those people said they wouldnt play it, and they would go join the unlocked camp.
Look how that turned out. Majority stayed in the locked camp because a lot of people have faction loyalty, the few that left to the unlocked camp either all plays on 1 faction and zergs the map for ez wins, or they came back to the locked camp.
I hope they lock all camps.
Majority simply stayed in the camapign that has always been the most populated one. But on PC EU, noCP became more populated than CP when they unlocked it. Before that the main CP campaign always had slightly higher population.
Alliance lock should of never been added into the game in the first place