Saucy_Jack wrote: »The first image was taken from ZOS's antiquities promo video. The second was taken in my house. I realize that the first was accomplished through forced perspective, but can this antiquity please be resized so that it's bigger than the size of like, a hamster skull?
While I expected it to be bigger than it actually is, it doesn't really matter. There are a lot of cool new furnishings, and it's a great paperweight.
In the scale of things (snare drum please!) there are far more important things need addressing than the size of one furnishing.
DiscountJaneAusten wrote: »Oh damn, I have never seen the picture of the large version of the ruby skull. I am appalled. But I choose to believe that that guy is indeed really tiny.
I've only unearthed one, so far.
It wasn't what I was expecting, but it is a nice artifact.
However--
I think it was a really dirty marketing stunt to use forced-perspective in the later promo pics to continue to create a false expectation of the item they used to represent the Antiquities system.
And they DID use it to represent the system. It was the very first Antiquity we as players saw.
Only... IN that first promo pic, there was no forced-perspective:
(from this article back in January)
(unless that dude is really tiny.)
And that pic set my expectation for what I'd find.
It is a nice little item, but I won't actively be looking for the lead, anymore. I'll complete the Codex for it, as I stumble across leads over time, but my level of desire for it has diminished.
It WAS going to be one of the items I absolutely wanted multiples of, but that was based on the size we were led to expect in that first pic, before I found the one I have.