The lighting in that comparison picture is horrible, on this one it already looks better. Added another one to see it in multiple lighting settings. Lighting really does a lot for your picture and can make the difference between something pleasing to the eye or something ugly to look at. (Edit) White balance is also a thing to account for as is exposure and ISO values to a certain degree.
SeaGtGruff wrote: »This might be one of those "Suddenly there's the sound of thousands of tortured souls screaming out in abject horror" things to ask, but do some collectors like to paint their collectible fantasy figurines themselves? I'm wondering if a neutral color was chosen so it would be easier to paint over by people who like to do that sort of thing?
Collectors do like to do that.
I mentioned it in my post further back in this thread.
Pewter miniatures for table-top RPGs are to a large degree sold unfinished (just as plain pewter) so that collectors can paint them according to their own desires.
You can buy them painted from some sources, usually for a much higher price, but I see them offered most often as unfinished.
Showing-off one's self-painted miniatures was a big part of the D&D paradigm when I was growing up, though I didn't participate in it. I collected a lot of miniatures, but I never painted them. I actually like the raw pewter look.
Painting such highly-detailed, tiny items was a task that was beyond my patience level.
Anyway, I would think that if that were the reason they shipped the statues in the state in which we are seeing, they would have just said so. It would be a totally legit reason, given its history in the gaming world.
But that's not what people were expecting when they plunked their coin down for the CE, since that's not how they advertised it in the marketing photos, and, further, that's not the reason they went with in the unboxing stream.
I just received my Greymoor CE statue and i have to say i am disappointed. The statue is bare grey plastics with no shading or layer over it to make it look shaded. My other 3 statues (base game, morrowind and summerset) do have this paint layer which looks metallic and some shading.
This looks like a bad Warhammer figurine which i have to pain myself which i will do cause it does stand out in the row now. It does not look like the advert at all.
I just received my Greymoor CE statue and i have to say i am disappointed. The statue is bare grey plastics with no shading or layer over it to make it look shaded. My other 3 statues (base game, morrowind and summerset) do have this paint layer which looks metallic and some shading.
This looks like a bad Warhammer figurine which i have to pain myself which i will do cause it does stand out in the row now. It does not look like the advert at all.
Are you sure it's bare plastic and not just painted a fairly similar colour to bare plastic, as the other ones appear to be?
Based on these latest pictures it seems half of this panic was caused by badly overexposed photo. That's the internet for you, I gues. Still would have prefered the darker more copperish look, though.Even if they wanted it to look like old bronze, that's totally how old bronze can look too. For example look at old greek statue "Artemision Bronze"(wanted to put link to wiki here, but it depicts pantsless guy and I have no idea how squeamish are these forums about that sort of thing and decided to not test it, so just google it if you're curious).
Most bronzes haven't been buried for centuries, though, so it's not really the same thing.
They're saying this is supposed to look like an artifact from a digsite, not just like an old bronze figurine.
MornaBaine wrote: »Looks like a nice bit of bait and switch. I'll be curious to see what people actually end up getting. Guess you can just paint your own.
Are you sure it's bare plastic and not just painted a fairly similar colour to bare plastic, as the other ones appear to be?
I confirm its bare plastic. If it is not it's a very bland and even spray of grey which i cant scratch off with a modelling knife.
It does not come with model paints. (I am planning on undercoating it black. Heavy dry brush with grey then inking it black and dry brushing it grey and a very light dry brush with lighter grey.
There is NO bronze coloring on it as on the Molag Baal, Morrowind or Summerset statue.
If i didn't have all the others i would have let this one pass me by.
Yeah, I thought when I saw the unboxing that loremaster Tuttle did, the color didn’t look anything like what they were saying. I assumed it was just some bad auto color thing from his webcam. Seems I should have trusted my own eyes.Thevampirenight wrote: »They talked abut it on their last live stream they went for a look for like an item that had been logged buried and got excavated or something. So the idea behind this coloring that its old and the coloring went away. As it would as it ages.
So that is why it looks like this.
It genuinely doesn't look like that though. It looks completely unpainted and untarnished, no texture, etc. Just like cheap plastic.
TheKingofSass wrote: »So mines arrived today, and it isn't as bad as the original pic posted here, to my relief. As someone mentioned it before, it's probably due very bad lighting conditions, cause in real life it actually does look like an ancient statue, and it has nice details on it.
There is indeed some bronze coloring going around, so if yours is just grey and washed out then uhh that maybe its it's a defect?? I def would contact support about it tbh.
ANYWAY, here are some pics.
TheKingofSass wrote: »So mines arrived today, and it isn't as bad as the original pic posted here, to my relief. As someone mentioned it before, it's probably due very bad lighting conditions, cause in real life it actually does look like an ancient statue, and it has nice details on it.
There is indeed some bronze coloring going around, so if yours is just grey and washed out then uhh that maybe its it's a defect?? I def would contact support about it tbh.
ANYWAY, here are some pics.
That one definitely looks best from the ones I seen. Perhaps it is a matter of photo quality as well, as I do think the contrast makes a bit difference.
What keeps getting me is that I feel like it lacks the proper finish, or texture, or something. Maybe something like a wash (as I believe the 40k/dyi crowd call it), that just adds more depths to the groves? I believe that would have made it look more antique/tarnished. What people are getting seems to look too clean/untouched.
Bl00dSucker wrote: »I just did a repaint of my own Vampire Lord Statue, because I did not liked the original grey one...
Used "Spiritus" to remove the old paint - worked perfectly... Then added new colours and a proper wash. Colours sticked well to the material.
Bl00dSucker wrote: »I just did a repaint of my own Vampire Lord Statue, because I did not liked the original grey one...
Used "Spiritus" to remove the old paint - worked perfectly... Then added new colours and a proper wash. Colours sticked well to the material.
How did you do it? Airbrush and a normal brush here and there? What paint?
Are ZOS hiring you to do the next one?
;3
Bl00dSucker wrote: »I just did a repaint of my own Vampire Lord Statue, because I did not liked the original grey one...
Used "Spiritus" to remove the old paint - worked perfectly... Then added new colours and a proper wash. Colours sticked well to the material.
I found the artist's blog a while ago. In fact, there were THREE artists working on it. One (the blogger) worked on legs, armor and - wings. One on face and torso, the last on the base and flames. The blogger also said the image used in promotion was made by ZOS. This means the statue's coloring in that image wasn't set in stone. And it seems we're getting a different color, closer to a vampire lord's actual skin color.
Honestly, the paint looks terrible. This can't be it.