shrekt4303 wrote: »I've been trying to queue at the same time as my buddy to get placed in the same match. It works, but we are always on different teams lol. I'm more of a fan of allowing duo queue rather than a separate group queue because it will make both queues longer by splitting the population up. Now if they had a ranked system that was solo only and an unranked that allowed groups I'd be okay with that too. Bgs is so lame by myself.
Commandment wrote: »
I/We can only hope ZOS makes the right decision. It would be nice if they just stated it was the new change instead of an experiment, at least I would not have to check up on it anymore Lol.
I do think they need to introduce a group queue however I don't see them 'reverting' the current system based on what I'm seeing on PS4 EU leaderboards. Before the change you would be lucky to see scores of over 200k. However with that score now you would be lucky to hit top 10.
BGs are much more popular now than they used to be going solely on this evidence.
the experiment is successful. why change something? of course, they should add a separate queue for 2-4 groups
Commandment wrote: »It's been about 2 months since me and a few friends stopped playing, is there any news about reverting it back to normal for the new greymoor patch. Or was saying it was an "experiment" just a way to ghost in a big change. Surely 2 months on a "Live" server should be enough.
I'm guessing if they don't revert it back during the release of greymoor, they have no intentions of letting friends play together in a mmo rpg, and may continue these for different aspects of the game under the guise of "experiments". Don't be surprised if it happens, if you laugh at people who want to play with there friends in bg and enjoy, wait until they touch your favorite aspects of the game. Don't worry though, it's just an experiment with an undefinable date or time for how LONG it will be. Just wait.
I/We can only hope ZOS makes the right decision. It would be nice if they just stated it was the new change instead of an experiment, at least I would not have to check up on it anymore Lol.
VoidCommander wrote: »I definitely prefer solo queue. Games are actually close now instead of the pugged group getting steamrolled every time. Sure rolling with my guildmates resulted in me being the one stomping on everyone, but I knew it wasn’t fair to people pugging.
precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
And you get your information from where? Oh your arse, okay.
I fully support grp v grp queues. Not pre-made groups with dedicated healer and stacking aoes vs pugs. At least grp v grp would be challenging.
Commandment wrote: »precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
And you get your information from where? Oh your arse, okay.
I fully support grp v grp queues. Not pre-made groups with dedicated healer and stacking aoes vs pugs. At least grp v grp would be challenging.
Most of the forums "was" complaining it more than praising it, it got so bad that they started removing threads stating "these threads are duplicates"
Only 1 thread atm about someone liking the change, but it's mostly full of mixed feelings and people trolling people who wants to play mmo with friends.
Commandment wrote: »precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
And you get your information from where? Oh your arse, okay.
I fully support grp v grp queues. Not pre-made groups with dedicated healer and stacking aoes vs pugs. At least grp v grp would be challenging.
Most of the forums "was" complaining it more than praising it, it got so bad that they started removing threads stating "these threads are duplicates"
Only 1 thread atm about someone liking the change, but it's mostly full of mixed feelings and people trolling people who wants to play mmo with friends.
And how much of the population is actually on the forums?
I am pretty sure the sides on yes or no are very similar...Or probably even pro solo
We shouldn’t forget that zos has the numbers, and either they see an increase of people playing pvp or not and since they didn’t revoke it, I am assuming the numbers did raise
Commandment wrote: »Most of the forums "was" complaining it more than praising it, it got so bad that they started removing threads stating "these threads are duplicates"
Only 1 thread atm about someone liking the change, but it's mostly full of mixed feelings and people trolling people who wants to play mmo with friends.
precambria wrote: »It's been an overwhelming failure and even the people who fully supported solo only BG have now recanted or at the very least constantly talk about how their team is trash without admitting the reason is because of MMR reset and the fact TONS of good players quit BG over this. Reality is there were not that many premades to begin with and now the quality of players in the queue is significantly lower.
And you get your information from where? Oh your arse, okay.
I fully support grp v grp queues. Not pre-made groups with dedicated healer and stacking aoes vs pugs. At least grp v grp would be challenging.
Commandment wrote: »Most of the forums "was" complaining it more than praising it, it got so bad that they started removing threads stating "these threads are duplicates"
Only 1 thread atm about someone liking the change, but it's mostly full of mixed feelings and people trolling people who wants to play mmo with friends.
I guess by "most" people you mean the 10 same guys who keep making the same comments on every single post regarding BGs, how everyone should be forced in the same queue, and how NONPREMADE groups make ESO single player game and not MMO(which is simply not true). If you read their comments carefully you can see most of them aren't even interested in having the second queue for premade, they only want this change reverted, so they can feel superior again beating nonorganized groups.
The truth is BG queues have never been faster, which might indicate that MORE people are doing BGs now, therefore one might get the idea the change is welcomed by the majority. It also might be cuz having odd number of groups of 2-4 premade players was just simply slowing the queue. But we can only guess, ZOS does have the real numbers. In any case, I think a faster queue is welcomed change especially for casual players who just want to jump into action.
Even though I do enjoy this change and think BGs are much better now. I do understand that people want to play with their friends so I am up for adding queues for groups only. But I don't see a single reason why should everyone be forced in one queue. And if the "premade" queues won't be active and you will just have to wait a long time in a queue, it is simple as that. But since you guys are saying that there are SO MANY players who want that I think you shouldn't be worried it won't be active right??
Commandment wrote: »Most of the forums "was" complaining it more than praising it, it got so bad that they started removing threads stating "these threads are duplicates"
Only 1 thread atm about someone liking the change, but it's mostly full of mixed feelings and people trolling people who wants to play mmo with friends.
I guess by "most" people you mean the 10 same guys who keep making the same comments on every single post regarding BGs, how everyone should be forced in the same queue, and how NONPREMADE groups make ESO single player game and not MMO(which is simply not true). If you read their comments carefully you can see most of them aren't even interested in having the second queue for premade, they only want this change reverted, so they can feel superior again beating nonorganized groups.
The truth is BG queues have never been faster, which might indicate that MORE people are doing BGs now, therefore one might get the idea the change is welcomed by the majority. It also might be cuz having odd number of groups of 2-4 premade players was just simply slowing the queue. But we can only guess, ZOS does have the real numbers. In any case, I think a faster queue is welcomed change especially for casual players who just want to jump into action.
Even though I do enjoy this change and think BGs are much better now. I do understand that people want to play with their friends so I am up for adding queues for groups only. But I don't see a single reason why should everyone be forced in one queue. And if the "premade" queues won't be active and you will just have to wait a long time in a queue, it is simple as that. But since you guys are saying that there are SO MANY players who want that I think you shouldn't be worried it won't be active right??
Commandment wrote: »
You do realize the forums only consist of a really small part of the community don't you? A lot of people didn't even know the change was going to happen when i told people in-game. More outrage than praise. So I'm not sure about these 10 people you speak of. Most people are reluctant to sign up because you literally have to research how to get into these forums, and create a ticket, and wait for that ticket to be approved just to join. Most people with the worst ideas and feedback, are the main people that talk on these forums. All the people who enjoy the game, are usually just quiet.
Bg's are the same. The more higher your MMR gets, the less games you will see. So there isnt much truth to that.
The old BG's worked, I don't know about this "I want to beat nonorganized groups" mentality you speak off, but I'm sure that goes for all players alike, hoping there enemies are stupid. Premades werent even a plague. Even if you run solo and your group smashes people you will still get hate whispers of being in a "premade". At the end of the day it's just an excuse. Even in current BG's, if a group of sweaty build characters with some decent knowledge work together, they will smash everyone, now everyone is just blaming each other to cover how much they suck. It's more toxic.
The thing that made BG's unbearable was not joining a match that don't start, and a match where your stuck at 2 people.
If they can't handle losing in a match maybe PVP, or any competitive game isnt something they should play. 2-3 extra people isnt hard to find, there are many guilds you could join to achieve this. But oh wait, It's best to be a hardcore soloist, and everyone should play your game, and your rules.
RezecNoble_ESO wrote: »[
This is the first MMO I have ever seen that took away the ability for a GROUP to que for a GROUP event. SWTOR is perhaps the most solo friendly MMO in the world and has the most solo focused story lines and even they haven't done anything this stupid. I don't play an MMO to play alone, I do it to play with friends and family.
RezecNoble_ESO wrote: »[
This is the first MMO I have ever seen that took away the ability for a GROUP to que for a GROUP event. SWTOR is perhaps the most solo friendly MMO in the world and has the most solo focused story lines and even they haven't done anything this stupid. I don't play an MMO to play alone, I do it to play with friends and family.
Not sure its great idea looking at game which has a declining population for several years, where even at peak hours aren't even thousands of ppl online, as a good example. If you actually check SWTOR forum from 6-7 years back when the game was still kinda played a lot of people were asking for separation of it too. Maybe some of them would stick around and still play the game today.
Nowadays most of the decent PvP games have premade and solo queues separated or at least have some kind of restriction where premades cant be more or even than 50% of the group, considering the fact that ESO only has 4 man team BGs, you break that point by allowing even duo queue. I'd rather look at those games who are trying to keep some competitive integrity
RezecNoble_ESO wrote: »
Yeah, Bioware wouldn't have just come out with a new expansion a few months ago if that were the case, nice try though. SWTOR is actually doing better right now than they've done in a long time. Yes I am aware of those people who were clamoring to get rid of premades, and Bioware didn't cave. ZOS did. That makes them an idiotic company for people running an MMO.
Look call me an elitist, but if your getting stomped over and over again as a PUG group it is your own fault for not finding a group or joining a guild. That is part of improving yourself in a GROUP activity. This is the same reason in most games for end game raids people have organized dedicated raid teams, if you take a group of random people in who do not know the content than you know going in that it wont be a fun easy time, same thing for PvP. If you que solo you take the chance of being grouped with random people, who haven't gotten good at their class, has *** gear, etc. That's your choice to be a loner. If you get stomped that is your own fault.
Now you solo kiddies are happy that you can PvP and know that there is a higher chance you won't face any kind of competition, it isn't competitive integrity. As solo que only you now have very minimum risk of ever facing an organized team, that is the opposite of competition.
RezecNoble_ESO wrote: »No I didn't even do that. When I saw that I couldn't click GROUP que when I was grouped with my son because I was teaching him to play the game and we had been leveling new characters together, ran some Cyrodiil, and then wanted to do some BGs, just quit playing that instant. I play with guild mates, I play with my son, I play with my wife. It is absolutely the stupidest thing in the world to sit right next to each other, play an MMO and not be able to be in the same group for a group activity. End of discussion. This is beyond idiotic.