Battlegrounds have CP suppressed, so everyone in there is 0 CP. There is absolutely no justification for blocking people from no-CP environments based on CP level.
And thanks to everyone who cried to remove the ability to group with friends, you will always get randomly grouped with random players of varying skill level. Even if it sometimes pisses you off.
VaranisArano wrote: »No, not without giving them their own queue (which won't happen because there's not that many of them).
ZOS in their infinite wisdom decided to have a below level 50 queue and a level 50+ queue.
Your suggestion amounts to telling a new player who's already been queuing in the Below 50 BGs "Sorry, go away until you've leveled up!"
VaranisArano wrote: »No, not without giving them their own queue (which won't happen because there's not that many of them).
ZOS in their infinite wisdom decided to have a below level 50 queue and a level 50+ queue.
Your suggestion amounts to telling a new player who's already been queuing in the Below 50 BGs "Sorry, go away until you've leveled up!"
OWN queue for what?? They cant play in this BG anyway . they can only die
Iam not jerk on them. I blaming ZOS.
It is a mistake. Maybe whole point of gear cap 160 cp is mistake.
I respect the developers ,but it still seems stupid to me same like This fake tank fake healer deal. its silly.
Yes is absolutely best block them for this few hours. Its better for competative gaming. Its better for them, becose they are stupid and lazy check inforamtions and dont have clue what going on .
They deserve just as much of a chance to play BG as you do. Plenty of people over cp160 don't have good gear and get one or two shotted so your argument is pretty pointless. If your high enough mmr then you really shouldn't be seeing many of those people in your matches anyway.
So your solution is to ban every player from 1-159 cp ? That’s kinda rude lol, they deserve to play bgs as much as you do my friend...and what’s about all the players above 160 running with pve traits in pvp ? Ban them too ? Or all the people with their general pve setup..
I met so many 810s that were as squishy as thoose under 160 boys.
I understand your point but your solution is stupid and won’t happen...
The game needs a proper mmr system or stuff like this will never change
They deserve just as much of a chance to play BG as you do. Plenty of people over cp160 don't have good gear and get one or two shotted so your argument is pretty pointless. If your high enough mmr then you really shouldn't be seeing many of those people in your matches anyway.
What you can know about MMR. Maybe i am so hight MMR so i that's why it takes me to them.
WHo knows. i repeat. i am in top 10 on leadeboard. i play only and only BGS. So think know what going on . thx
They deserve just as much of a chance to play BG as you do. Plenty of people over cp160 don't have good gear and get one or two shotted so your argument is pretty pointless. If your high enough mmr then you really shouldn't be seeing many of those people in your matches anyway.
What you can know about MMR. Maybe i am so hight MMR so i that's why it takes me to them.
WHo knows. i repeat. i am in top 10 on leadeboard. i play only and only BGS. So think know what going on . thx
Top 10 on leader boards just means you play a lot of BGs, doesn't mean your actually good at them.
rikimm16_ESO wrote: »I rarely get team with <160CP and I play an average of 2 hours a night in BGs. I have no idea how MMR works in BGs, but I believe being in the top leaderboards doesn’t mean you have a high MMR... it most likely means you just play a heck lot of BG. It’s possible your MMR is so low you get team with <160CP even if you are at the top 10 in the leaderboards.
Kidgangster101 wrote: »What should happen is increase in low level bonus. It should last until you get to 160 instead of 50. That would allow players having fun in PVP to not level out of it and go from having PVP matches to getting killed in 2 shots.
Battlegrounds have CP suppressed, so everyone in there is 0 CP. There is absolutely no justification for blocking people from no-CP environments based on CP level.
And thanks to everyone who cried to remove the ability to group with friends, you will always get randomly grouped with random players of varying skill level. Even if it sometimes pisses you off.
What?? DO we play same game??
They dont have gear !!! I smash them on 2 hits. I can kill them 1v4 .
They are only meat shiled. hard to play with them. Dont have fun killing them for 2 hits.
I am in top 10 leaderboard for Bgs and i have every second game this peoples.
there is a gear cap u know .. 160 CP
How long take make 160 CP few hours.. ?? Just block them omg
And again for everyone slowly here .
For those who don't need to kill weakly.
MMR or not, Low or high . This is about gear cap.
Whathever MMR is it . They have handicapped .
¨And again for everyone slowly here .
For those who don't need to kill weakly.
MMR or not, Low or high . This is about gear cap.
Whathever MMR is it . They have handicapped .
Gear cap is irrelevant. A CP 20 player wearing CP 20 gear has gear just as powerful as a CP 160 player wearing CP 160 gear.
¨And again for everyone slowly here .
For those who don't need to kill weakly.
MMR or not, Low or high . This is about gear cap.
Whathever MMR is it . They have handicapped .
Gear cap is irrelevant. A CP 20 player wearing CP 20 gear has gear just as powerful as a CP 160 player wearing CP 160 gear.
+1 for constructive answer for this topic .
Players under 160 CP dont have reason care for set or whatever . and its understable. So they have big nothink
Battlegrounds have CP suppressed, so everyone in there is 0 CP. There is absolutely no justification for blocking people from no-CP environments based on CP level.
Kidgangster101 wrote: »What should happen is increase in low level bonus. It should last until you get to 160 instead of 50. That would allow players having fun in PVP to not level out of it and go from having PVP matches to getting killed in 2 shots.
why dont they change the 50+ queue to a 810+ queue than would be fine everyone who plays serious is max lvl anyway
MurderMostFoul wrote: »Battlegrounds have CP suppressed, so everyone in there is 0 CP. There is absolutely no justification for blocking people from no-CP environments based on CP level.
Lol, do you know about the 160CP gear cap? It makes a huge difference in BGs. Please be more informed before expressing such indignation.Kidgangster101 wrote: »What should happen is increase in low level bonus. It should last until you get to 160 instead of 50. That would allow players having fun in PVP to not level out of it and go from having PVP matches to getting killed in 2 shots.
Yes, queues should be sub 160CP and 160 or higher CP. I'm sure it would be more enjoyable for everyone.
I can't imagine we would have near enough players to give an under gear cap queue.
Conversely, if we left them in the under 50 queue then we would have complaints there much in the same vein as the reason people give for hating pre made groups in queues.