Erm? read the thread title and the ops post, still none the wiser? A little explanation for the none 1337 amongst us might help us understand the point you are trying to make)
MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
You don't have to la weave to do content. It's just going to always provide an advantage if you do.
As someone who defended Zos on their current silence I take it all back this is the biggest slap in the face you can give us. During these tough times people want security and consistency and now they are taking about flipping the whole game on its head for the millionth time. I am extremely upset with the changes to light attack and im sitting here on the verge of tears because I know I will lose the remaining of my friends list if the change goes through.
This is garbage, this doesn't improve the game at all. There NEEDS to be a skill gap, it's what pushes players to be competitive but these new changes to LA are dumbing the game down too much.
Its starting to feel like Zos isn't being honest with their stance on animation canceling and they word things so they can keep stringing us along
pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
You don't have to la weave to do content. It's just going to always provide an advantage if you do.
Fur_like_snow wrote: »Yeah for a six year old game they sure make a lot of extreme changes every patch. I’d ask the question why is it necessary to overhaul combat?
pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
You don't have to la weave to do content. It's just going to always provide an advantage if you do.
John_Falstaff wrote: »pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
You don't have to la weave to do content. It's just going to always provide an advantage if you do.
Right. So you're going to do portals in Nahviintaas HM without LA weaving. And you'll clear that content. Stream that please, I'll stock up on popcorn.
John_Falstaff wrote: »pma_pacifier wrote: »MagSorc No Pet
Did a parse with LA weaving on PTS (90 LA/s) - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - 12% (Old parses are in range of 20+) of total damage on LA's and never went under 75% of mana.
Did a parse with 0 LA or Heavy attacks - Breton + Parse food + raid dummy - Went entirely out of resources before parse finished and did lower damage.
Yes you will have to LA. I don't know why people are freaking out.
Stam that use Rele at all will Still LA. etc. Go test on PTS
WAT? I need to LA????? shouldn't the change make it so that I don't need to do such stuff?
"While we believe it’s good to have a skill gap that promotes mastery, we also believe the gap as it currently exists is too wide, and that many players aren’t finding satisfaction in the climb. Additionally, we believe the over-reliance on a specific mechanic (light attack weaving) leaves less room for playstyle diversity, including lower-APM options."
I should not have to rely on LA weaving now on PTS, come on.
You don't have to la weave to do content. It's just going to always provide an advantage if you do.
Right. So you're going to do portals in Nahviintaas HM without LA weaving. And you'll clear that content. Stream that please, I'll stock up on popcorn.
This is a wonderful idea. Have the developers live stream nahvi hm on pts live.
As someone who defended Zos on their current silence I take it all back this is the biggest slap in the face you can give us. During these tough times people want security and consistency and now they are taking about flipping the whole game on its head for the millionth time. I am extremely upset with the changes to light attack and im sitting here on the verge of tears because I know I will lose the remaining of my friends list if the change goes through.
This is garbage, this doesn't improve the game at all. There NEEDS to be a skill gap, it's what pushes players to be competitive but these new changes to LA are dumbing the game down too much.
Its starting to feel like Zos isn't being honest with their stance on animation canceling and they word things so they can keep stringing us along
As someone who defended Zos on their current silence I take it all back this is the biggest slap in the face you can give us. During these tough times people want security and consistency and now they are taking about flipping the whole game on its head for the millionth time. I am extremely upset with the changes to light attack and im sitting here on the verge of tears because I know I will lose the remaining of my friends list if the change goes through.
This is garbage, this doesn't improve the game at all. There NEEDS to be a skill gap, it's what pushes players to be competitive but these new changes to LA are dumbing the game down too much.
Its starting to feel like Zos isn't being honest with their stance on animation canceling and they word things so they can keep stringing us along
As someone who defended Zos on their current silence I take it all back this is the biggest slap in the face you can give us. During these tough times people want security and consistency and now they are taking about flipping the whole game on its head for the millionth time. I am extremely upset with the changes to light attack and im sitting here on the verge of tears because I know I will lose the remaining of my friends list if the change goes through.
This is garbage, this doesn't improve the game at all. There NEEDS to be a skill gap, it's what pushes players to be competitive but these new changes to LA are dumbing the game down too much.
Its starting to feel like Zos isn't being honest with their stance on animation canceling and they word things so they can keep stringing us along
Thevampirenight wrote: »Basically its an obvious more technical term they use for animation canceling/lightweaving and those that don't animation cancel or cancel as good. From the patch notes
Players with high Actions Per Minute (APM) significantly outperform those with low APM, as they have better up-time of abilities, higher mitigation, much higher DPS, and can simply move around the battlefield better in both PVE and PVP.
So High Apm is fast past combat using animation canceling and low apm would likely be those that don't animation cancel. So like Dps is Damage per second, they use their own term for their combat play and call it Apm, Actions Per Minute. So there is high apm and low apm play styles.
I am more-so extremely pissed off with the way they acknowledged the skill gap and saying it's too high. It's not. Learn the damn game like all of the veteran players have done and go through the experience of improving whether it be PvE or PvP. This has really cemented what ZOS is trying to do with their game in catering to casuals, we all knew it was slowly becoming a thing, but this just confirms it. Veteran players get nothing in return and are consistently having to change up playstyles in ever-changing metas. Really disappointed in what they have said here.
Thevampirenight wrote: »Basically its an obvious more technical term they use for animation canceling/lightweaving and those that don't animation cancel or cancel as good. From the patch notes
Players with high Actions Per Minute (APM) significantly outperform those with low APM, as they have better up-time of abilities, higher mitigation, much higher DPS, and can simply move around the battlefield better in both PVE and PVP.
So High Apm is fast past combat using animation canceling and low apm would likely be those that don't animation cancel. So like Dps is Damage per second, they use their own term for their combat play and call it Apm, Actions Per Minute. So there is high apm and low apm play styles.
Yup, its rediculous atm, since this game penalizes you for not animation cancelling. My only complaint is they call it skill, its not skill when everyone can bloody do it from youtube.
There NEEDS to be a skill gap,
I am more-so extremely pissed off with the way they acknowledged the skill gap and saying it's too high. It's not. Learn the damn game like all of the veteran players have done and go through the experience of improving whether it be PvE or PvP. This has really cemented what ZOS is trying to do with their game in catering to casuals, we all knew it was slowly becoming a thing, but this just confirms it. Veteran players get nothing in return and are consistently having to change up playstyles in ever-changing metas. Really disappointed in what they have said here.