why are people trying to make the next chapter about skyrim?

Tommy_The_Gun

Tbh. I don't have anything against Skyrim in ESO, but, I simply had this thought recently:

ESO servers, despite numerous optimizations & fixes are kinda overloaded in pick-hours. This is Especially noticeable on EU Servers as those servers simply have to handle way more players than NA servers. (ZOS said it themselves). And of course, we also have cancelled events - PvP Midyear Mayhem and PvE Undaunted event.

What I simply fear is: Skyrim = Nostalgia. It will attract a lot of new player for sure. More player = even more server load...
Yikes !


So well, if they don't invest in better servers that can handle larger amounts of player... well... it is gonna end badly...

MehrunesFlagon

ketsparrowhawk wrote: »

I hope it's true. A Nord-focused expansion is long overdue!

What are they going to call it? The year of the drunk?

NettleCarrier

Personally, it's been about 7 years since I played Skyrim. I don't want to play another Single Player game, I find them kind of boring. It's at the point now where this would be nostalgic to me, despite it being the current ES Game.

Dark_Lord_Kuro

RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »

Yes, it looks like the next Chapter will be located somewhere in Skyrim. It might even be called ESO:Skyrim. But, that's about all it's going to have in common with TES V.

There will be:

No cart ride to Helgen.
No Dragonborn, and no collecting Dragon Souls or Dragon Shouts.
No Alduin.
No Empire v Stormcloak civil war.
No Thalmor and no Talos.
No Thieves quests, no DB sanctuary and no Nightingales (but there will be a Mages Guild and Fighters Guild presence).
No clunky, feature-starved TES V combat and skills progression systems.
No suicidal companions jumping in front of the enemy.
No battle-crazed horses.
No strobing shadows and textures.
No mods to fix it all.

There won't be any Eastmarch, Rift or Falkreath in the new Chapter either, because they're already in ESO. And when you think about Eastmarch, The Rift and Falkreath in ESO, what exactly do they have in common with the Eastmarch, Rift and Falkreath that were in TESV? Very little indeed.

[snip] The playable content in the next ESO chapter is going to feel very new, although some of the snow and perhaps a few of the major buildings may look familiar.

Minor edit for bait.

IF helgen is part of the chapter i can see new character start in prison there

I could see them add falkreath sometime in the future
If you take the cart in craglorn/ dunjeon finder you get the undersiege version if you walk there you get a post siege version
i would see it as part of a future Markath(probably just butchered that name) chapter as a minor town with sidequest

Dark_Lord_Kuro

MehrunesFlagon wrote: »

ketsparrowhawk wrote: »

I hope it's true. A Nord-focused expansion is long overdue!

What are they going to call it? The year of the drunk?

I could see a story line about the falmer starting to appear in dwemer ruin around skyrim and a part of the story line would explain why there isnt any falmer in other ruin in eastmarch or riften
They could go for year of the falmer if they go in that dirrection

Aznarb

I don't mind what is the next traveling area.
I'll be happy to explore every new zone

jircris11

dcam86b14_ESO wrote: »

well technically since this is set in the past, it's an original Skyrim.

Why do people continue to complain, its so stale ....

Issue I see is this, people will go there expecting skyrim from the single player game. They wont get that this is WAY before then so most if the cities wont exist.

richo262

RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »

Yes, it looks like the next Chapter will be located somewhere in Skyrim. It might even be called ESO:Skyrim. But, that's about all it's going to have in common with TES V.

There will be:

No cart ride to Helgen.
No Dragonborn, and no collecting Dragon Souls or Dragon Shouts.
No Alduin.
No Empire v Stormcloak civil war.
No Thalmor and no Talos.
No Thieves quests, no DB sanctuary and no Nightingales (but there will be a Mages Guild and Fighters Guild presence).
No clunky, feature-starved TES V combat and skills progression systems.
No suicidal companions jumping in front of the enemy.
No battle-crazed horses.
No strobing shadows and textures.
No mods to fix it all.

There won't be any Eastmarch, Rift or Falkreath in the new Chapter either, because they're already in ESO. And when you think about Eastmarch, The Rift and Falkreath in ESO, what exactly do they have in common with the Eastmarch, Rift and Falkreath that were in TESV? Very little indeed.

[snip] The playable content in the next ESO chapter is going to feel very new, although some of the snow and perhaps a few of the major buildings may look familiar.

Minor edit for bait.

Assuming the Chapter zone covers the area where Falkreath would be, you'd probably be able to go to the Falkreath area, but you won't be able to go into it, as it is presently under siege.

The DLC Dungeon Falkreath Hold would be moved from the Craglorn eastern door to the actual location of Falkreath. Just like the latest DLC dungeon does not require ownership of Elsweyr chapter to enter the dungeon.

Similar to how Sunhold was not a city in Summerset, it was a public dungeon. Also Orcrest in Elsweyr was not a city, but a public dungeon. I expect Falkreath to have a presence, but you cannot enter it like you would a normal city.

The chapter could simply be Norther Skyrim, in which case, we won't see Falkreath until later.

JJBoomer

Also the fact that it would be a past version of Skyrim, which could be very different. 1000 years of difference. Since Skyrim the game is technically in the future. So there's a lot they could do with a past version of Skyrim.

Revokus

RaddlemanNumber7 wrote: »

Yes, it looks like the next Chapter will be located somewhere in Skyrim. It might even be called ESO:Skyrim. But, that's about all it's going to have in common with TES V.

There will be:

No cart ride to Helgen.
No Dragonborn, and no collecting Dragon Souls or Dragon Shouts.
No Alduin.
No Empire v Stormcloak civil war.
No Thalmor and no Talos.
No Thieves quests, no DB sanctuary and no Nightingales (but there will be a Mages Guild and Fighters Guild presence).
No clunky, feature-starved TES V combat and skills progression systems.
No suicidal companions jumping in front of the enemy.
No battle-crazed horses.
No strobing shadows and textures.
No mods to fix it all.

There won't be any Eastmarch, Rift or Falkreath in the new Chapter either, because they're already in ESO. And when you think about Eastmarch, The Rift and Falkreath in ESO, what exactly do they have in common with the Eastmarch, Rift and Falkreath that were in TESV? Very little indeed.

[snip] The playable content in the next ESO chapter is going to feel very new, although some of the snow and perhaps a few of the major buildings may look familiar.

Minor edit for bait.

If it's Skyrim I just hope we get a place with blizzard storms and huge snow peak mountains we could go on top. I still haven't played Skyrim xD And I hope the snow looks better and less plastic like than Eastmarch..

MehrunesFlagon

Honestly hoping Blackreach,It's Skyrim then kind of not Skyrim at the same time.

SeaGtGruff

ESO can have Skyrim in it without it being Skyrim from TES5, just like it has Vvardenfell in it without it being Vvardenfell from TES3. Different time, different events, differences in the cities, etc.

LuxLunae

Fun fact I hated skyrim and it's people and committed crimes against them. I had nothing to say in my defense.

FierceSam

Goregrinder wrote: »

I've never played Skyrim actually.

Then if you want to go to Skyrim, there is an entire single player game out there waiting for you. And it’s good.

redlink1979

Why? Because many start to play ESO thinking this is Skyrim Online....

An image release months ago gave them hope.

Several, what some might call, "hints" on the last dlc given them even more hope.

BisDasBlutGefriert

Someone had posted this in the Reddit, and I found it very interesting. Props to the creator and his/her time spent making it:

https://i.redd.it/oq3tyd1qfb831.png

(Not letting me upload the pic on my phone, es tut Mir leid)

xxthir13enxx

BisDasBlutGefriert wrote: »

Someone had posted this in the Reddit, and I found it very interesting. Props to the creator and his/her time spent making it:



(Not letting me upload the pic on my phone, es tut Mir leid)

Huyen

wolfbone wrote: »

seems every year there's people trying to make every new dlc or chapter into skyrim. why?
they milked it for every penny, the bloody thing has gotten so stale now.
it would be so much better to have something new and original instead of the same old crap.

Mainly beccause most of the real TES fans expected Eso to be a online Skyrim.

CMDR_Un1k0rn

We're not trying to make the next chapter Skyrim.

Nobody is trying because that decision is out of our hands. (As it should be)

ZOS will have decided long ago where the chapter will be set. Honestly it's not beyond reason to suspect they had the plot for next year's chapter decided years ago. Possibly even when the game only just came out.

The only "trying" I see is from people who, for some weird reason, take great offence to the notion of ESO going to a long established location in the TES universe.

Can someone explain to me why a chapter set in Skyrim would be bad? It honestly boggles me. I mean at the end of the day... Skyrim was always there. It's there right now in lore-speak. You guys do understand that Skyrim does not mean the TESV quest-line will be cloned, right?

redgreensunset

CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »

We're not trying to make the next chapter Skyrim.

Nobody is trying because that decision is out of our hands. (As it should be)

ZOS will have decided long ago where the chapter will be set. Honestly it's not beyond reason to suspect they had the plot for next year's chapter decided years ago. Possibly even when the game only just came out.

The only "trying" I see is from people who, for some weird reason, take great offence to the notion of ESO going to a long established location the TES universe.

Can someone explain to me why a chapter set in Skyrim would be bad? It honestly boggles me. I mean at the end of the day... Skyrim was always there. It's there right now in lore-speak. You guys do understand that Skyrim does not mean the TESV quest-line will be cloned, right?

Personally I'm absolutely neutral where a Skyrim chapter is concerned. If the story is done well I know I'll enjoy it and that's the primary thing for me.

My reason for not wanting it now is the same as @Tommy_The_Gun's, performance. I would much rather they do something else until they were sure those performance fixes they're working on actually did what they were supposed to before rolling out Skyrim. Because a Skyrim expansion would mean a massive influx of new and returning players wanting to see it. EU server is still wonky, Activity Finder still isn't working properly and is threatening to burn down the server at peak population times and apparently pvp is... um yeah, we all know that.
So my concern is that the servers, and not just PC/EU, won't be able to handle the added pressure as they are right now and we have no proof, and personally I have little confidence, that they'll burn down completely. That's why I don't want them to do Skyrim next year.

CMDR_Un1k0rn

redgreensunset wrote: »

CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »

We're not trying to make the next chapter Skyrim.

Nobody is trying because that decision is out of our hands. (As it should be)

ZOS will have decided long ago where the chapter will be set. Honestly it's not beyond reason to suspect they had the plot for next year's chapter decided years ago. Possibly even when the game only just came out.

The only "trying" I see is from people who, for some weird reason, take great offence to the notion of ESO going to a long established location the TES universe.

Can someone explain to me why a chapter set in Skyrim would be bad? It honestly boggles me. I mean at the end of the day... Skyrim was always there. It's there right now in lore-speak. You guys do understand that Skyrim does not mean the TESV quest-line will be cloned, right?

Personally I'm absolutely neutral where a Skyrim chapter is concerned. If the story is done well I know I'll enjoy it and that's the primary thing for me.

My reason for not wanting it now is the same as @Tommy_The_Gun's, performance. I would much rather they do something else until they were sure those performance fixes they're working on actually did what they were supposed to before rolling out Skyrim. Because a Skyrim expansion would mean a massive influx of new and returning players wanting to see it. EU server is still wonky, Activity Finder still isn't working properly and is threatening to burn down the server at peak population times and apparently pvp is... um yeah, we all know that.
So my concern is that the servers, and not just PC/EU, won't be able to handle the added pressure as they are right now and we have no proof, and personally I have little confidence, that they'll burn down completely. That's why I don't want them to do Skyrim next year.

That right there is a solid, logical, and respectable answer.

Yes, technical concerns are very important to consider and Skyrim is the proverbial flame for the moths.

Certainly, I agree with your answer. What I don't agree with is the mindless "But we had TESV already".

SpacemanSpiff1

skyrim fans have been bangin that drum forever. it just so happens they're probably right this time (supposedly from in-game references and data mining).

Not my cup of tea, but it would be good for the population. although more population is bad for the servers.

zaria

Katahdin wrote: »

Because people wanted to play Skyrim with Friends and not ESO

They can play fallout with friends

CMDR_Un1k0rn

zaria wrote: »

Katahdin wrote: »

Because people wanted to play Skyrim with Friends and not ESO

They can play fallout with friends

I mean last I checked there's a mod project that is literally letting people playing Skyrim with friends.

Royaji

CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »

zaria wrote: »

Katahdin wrote: »

Because people wanted to play Skyrim with Friends and not ESO

They can play fallout with friends

I mean last I checked there's a mod project that is literally letting people playing Skyrim with friends.

The one that got caught stealing code from other addon authors and went into hiatus after that?

CMDR_Un1k0rn

Royaji wrote: »

CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »

zaria wrote: »

Katahdin wrote: »

Because people wanted to play Skyrim with Friends and not ESO

They can play fallout with friends

I mean last I checked there's a mod project that is literally letting people playing Skyrim with friends.

The one that got caught stealing code from other addon authors and went into hiatus after that?

It has been a while since I last looked at it because I have no interest myself.

Thanks for the information, didn't know that.

SidraWillowsky

Goregrinder wrote: »

I've never played Skyrim actually.

If you're into single-player RPGs go play it yesterday. Hurry, because TES games are

not


known


to


age


gracefully


(I personally find the faces in Oblivion to be the most horrifying)

SidraWillowsky

Xvorg wrote: »

Not quite interested in a Skyrim chapter... Maybe a Hammerfell chapter or the Gold Coast would be OK... Although a Solstheim chapter could be something I would like to see.

I'd like more Hammerfell as well, but I suspect that's going to be left alone because it's been speculated that TES VI will take place there.

rpa

Of course first thing to do is to install bunch of mods to make a single player TES game playable and beautiful. I expect next one will place monetization over free moddability and for that reason alone be not worth bothering with at all.

Faulgor

I don't really understand the problem. Skyrim is more than a game released 9 years ago, you know?

This year's cats and dragons theme was way more fanservice, imo.