I think it is about time ZOS ditch the megaserver concept and go with regional servers.
It's very clear that it is only so much you can stuff into a pork bun.
RefLiberty wrote: »If the issues is with the Finder going bonkers with the database and calling DB queries that are killing server resources, and they said exactly that is the issue, than you will solve nothing, smaller servers will die even quicker. The issue needs to be resolved, and server power allocation and management is up to them.
What seems curious is that the NA server has very few of these problems. Why is it the EU server every time?
My guess is that ZoS has decided to milk profits, and not invest what is likely to be a big chunk of money to upgrade the EU server.
If both kept going down, it would point to code, or infrastructure. But one runs fine, the other doesn't. ZoS has to know why, and the reason they won't fix it.
What seems curious is that the NA server has very few of these problems. Why is it the EU server every time?
My guess is that ZoS has decided to milk profits, and not invest what is likely to be a big chunk of money to upgrade the EU server.
If both kept going down, it would point to code, or infrastructure. But one runs fine, the other doesn't. ZoS has to know why, and the reason they won't fix it.
Can we assume they run the same code on US and EU, if so are they fixing something that isn't broke one the US server ?
What seems curious is that the NA server has very few of these problems. Why is it the EU server every time?
My guess is that ZoS has decided to milk profits, and not invest what is likely to be a big chunk of money to upgrade the EU server.
If both kept going down, it would point to code, or infrastructure. But one runs fine, the other doesn't. ZoS has to know why, and the reason they won't fix it.
Ydrisselle wrote: »
That would mean PC NA should have these problems too, and they have it way less times than us...
Ydrisselle wrote: »
That would mean PC NA should have these problems too, and they have it way less times than us...
They said, last year that while PC EU had these issues because of numbers, PC NA was beginning to reach the same population density. Over the last week similar issues have begun to affect PC NA too.
It's an issue of numbers of players. PC EU has more players playing for longer as it covers a far greater population than PC NA
Malem_Benign wrote: »
Malem_Benign wrote: »
Ydrisselle wrote: »Ydrisselle wrote: »
That would mean PC NA should have these problems too, and they have it way less times than us...
They said, last year that while PC EU had these issues because of numbers, PC NA was beginning to reach the same population density. Over the last week similar issues have begun to affect PC NA too.
It's an issue of numbers of players. PC EU has more players playing for longer as it covers a far greater population than PC NA
I know that, but I'm not sure the only culprit is the spaghetti code. If it was then we could kill PC NA every time we log on there instead of PC EU, and it simply doesn't happen frequently...
Ydrisselle wrote: »Ydrisselle wrote: »
That would mean PC NA should have these problems too, and they have it way less times than us...
They said, last year that while PC EU had these issues because of numbers, PC NA was beginning to reach the same population density. Over the last week similar issues have begun to affect PC NA too.
It's an issue of numbers of players. PC EU has more players playing for longer as it covers a far greater population than PC NA
I know that, but I'm not sure the only culprit is the spaghetti code. If it was then we could kill PC NA every time we log on there instead of PC EU, and it simply doesn't happen frequently...
I'm sure none of us really know what the culprit is.... but it is triggered by the significantly greater density of PC EU players. There are more of them playing over a greater length of time than on PC NA.
I would imagine that if each of them decided to play on PC NA at the same time, the result would be equally catastrophic.
RefLiberty wrote: »
freespirit wrote: »Me too, got booted can't relog
Alienoutlaw wrote: »301 error just now
chess1ukb16_ESO wrote: »Wow the server toppled over after giving everyone (that was logged in) the next daily reward. #That is how ropey the servers are. Something that basic. Pathetic.
Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »chess1ukb16_ESO wrote: »Wow the server toppled over after giving everyone (that was logged in) the next daily reward. #That is how ropey the servers are. Something that basic. Pathetic.
Yo Ireniicus! Strangely enough, if you press F for help page when you get an error, the whole help page is down also. So this is definitely server-sided in my opinion, albeit unprofessional.
chess1ukb16_ESO wrote: »Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »chess1ukb16_ESO wrote: »Wow the server toppled over after giving everyone (that was logged in) the next daily reward. #That is how ropey the servers are. Something that basic. Pathetic.
Yo Ireniicus! Strangely enough, if you press F for help page when you get an error, the whole help page is down also. So this is definitely server-sided in my opinion, albeit unprofessional.
Yes, the hiccup was 100% server-side. It has to be server-side for everyone to be affected? I was just noting it happened moments after the daily reward popped up which would back end be a server-side job running. The job likely caused the server to have its moment despite it being midnight when 80% of the active player base is offline.