We want this game to perform well too, it's the reason we are so adamant in showing our displeasure. Don't just shut the door in our face take your criticism, learn from it, and fix the game that so many people enjoy
Donny_Vito wrote: »We want this game to perform well too, it's the reason we are so adamant in showing our displeasure. Don't just shut the door in our face take your criticism, learn from it, and fix the game that so many people enjoy
I think the issue is how the discontent is relayed to ZoS. Your message thread is pretty straight-forward and polite, even though it doesn't offer much usefulness. The ones that get banned are the disrespectful threads that have no intent other than trying to be disrespectful.
And this idea is not something specific to ESO forums or this game.... if you want someone to treat you wish respect then you need to show respect as well. You can't expect to bash the ZoS mods/developers and not get banned. Have some common-sense, folks.
Hey @Starlock
We've been doing it constructively for 5 years. And still they invested like nothing in the game performance section, especially in Cyrodiil.
Years pass, and the performance gets worse.
So now it's the time for rebellion. Posting videos about lag and complaining EVERY DAY.
BUT HEY, WE HAVE NEW COSMETIC MOUNTS IN THE STORE.
Hey @Starlock
We've been doing it constructively for 5 years. And still they invested like nothing in the game performance section, especially in Cyrodiil.
Years pass, and the performance gets worse.
So now it's the time for rebellion. Posting videos about lag and complaining EVERY DAY.
BUT HEY, WE HAVE NEW COSMETIC MOUNTS IN THE STORE.
So now it's the time for rebellion. Posting videos about lag and complaining EVERY DAY.
Donny_Vito wrote: »
Right. Go to the "Bugs" category and you'll see a lot of well-documented, constructive threads about issues with the game that ZoS comments on.
But it's these people that just want to start a ranting thread and then demand that a ZoS dev make an official statement on it, and then get upset when there thread gets closed due to how nonconstructive and disrespectful it turned into.
Donny_Vito wrote: »
Right. Go to the "Bugs" category and you'll see a lot of well-documented, constructive threads about issues with the game that ZoS comments on.
But it's these people that just want to start a ranting thread and then demand that a ZoS dev make an official statement on it, and then get upset when there thread gets closed due to how nonconstructive and disrespectful it turned into.
You call it ranting but when players blew up last time over silence being added to incap the combat dev was in there saying "Heyo Gang! We have been reading your feedback about the changes to Incapacitating Strike and are investigating counter-play options for the Silence that's been added to this ability."...ranting, feedback, criticism...whatever you want to call it if we keep doing it they'll eventually respond/acknowledge it and if not it's still worth a shot
But as you said, respect is a two-way street. So when bugs are reported, respecting the provider/consumer relationship means communicating about it, not just taking more money and then hiding behind a rock. They aren't giving respect, so they get none in return. All these posts that act like everybody started out salty - there is a reason people have lost their patience and have stopped moderating their tone.
whatever you want to call it if we keep doing it they'll eventually respond/acknowledge it and if not it's still worth a shot
We want this game to perform well too, it's the reason we are so adamant in showing our displeasure. Don't just shut the door in our face take your criticism, learn from it, and fix the game that so many people enjoy
Donny_Vito wrote: »whatever you want to call it if we keep doing it they'll eventually respond/acknowledge it and if not it's still worth a shot
But they are responding.... they are closing your threads.
You'll see a direct correlation between constructive threads and an extended lifespan vs. 'ranting' threads that are nonconstructive and their lack of a lifespan.
You are also on a private forum as well, so these responses that mimic the thought of "I have the right to say what I want" are not true. You are given the privilege to correspond with other players and ZoS employees on these forums, so at least try to be respectful and professional at the very least.
While I'm sure I share the same sentiment as others when I say I would love to see you keep playing the game, but if the game frustrates you that much, or you are dissatisfied with the service and the lack of representation you feel you are getting, you are free to move on to another game.
alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »We want this game to perform well too, it's the reason we are so adamant in showing our displeasure. Don't just shut the door in our face take your criticism, learn from it, and fix the game that so many people enjoy
What do you expect when the locked threads are in the style of a toddler throwing their dummy out of the pram?
Also, do you want 33 threads of one page cluttering up the forum or 1 thread of 33 pages? I know which gets the most attention. You only have to look at the thread about the removal of the Bosmer passive to see that.