Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »You really cant go wrong with either. It's interesting because one look at these forums would lead you to believe that there are basically two crowds in ESO, the NerfSorc and NerfNB fanboys. Both are certainly able to complete all content. I dont have any data to support this, but I would also bet they are the two most commonly played specs in eso.
The reality is that the two specs play very similarly to one another. Both are best played as ranged DPS builds, and both have their niches in PVP, but neither are top of the food chain.
The first question you have to ask yourself, do you mind playing with pets, as that alone can be your decision maker. If you dont like pets, stop reading and make a NB. A sorc without a pet is basically a crappy version of a mageblade.
PVE:
Sorcs are generally a little easier to play, but NBs have been king of DPS mountain for a long time. In the best hands and the best groups, I still think they are going to be slightly ahead of sorcs as a trial DPS. Most of the upcoming nerfs to NB really dont matter all that much in a good group. That said, most of us dont have perfect dynamic rotation or perfect raids to play in all the time. Sorc rotations are easier on the fingers, and pets add very good survival and damage. I think if your goal is the glassiest of glass cannons, NBs are still on top. But if not, sorcs are probably more accessible for a larger percent of the population. I always recommend mag sorc to anyone that is new to the game or perhaps struggles with button pressing. Sorcs have more versitilty than NBs as Damage Dealers, because you can play heavy attack builds, no pet, 1 pet, 2 pet, etc.
PVP:
In group play, NBs are going to be more damage focused and sorcs are going to be more support focused. In solo play, Sorcs are a bit sturdier and NBs are more elusive. NBs have more flexibility in their PVP builds, as their toolkit is a little more versatile from a PVP standpoint. They have better access to major minor buffs as well. 95% of sorcs are running 8-9 of the same skills, that said, some of those skills are pretty darn strong. If you like kiting people around and picking them off 1 by 1, sorc is probably a bit better. If you want to bomb 10 people at once, NB is better.
Overall, If you are an exceptional button presser, I would go mageblade. If you are not, a sorc is probably a slightly better option.
It can be very hard to make an analysis like this because things change from patch to patch. The one account I have seen with 100% achievement points was a DK, which makes sense, because a good tank is in a great position to get all the PVE achievements. I would say that overall since launch, NB has spent more time on top of more categories than Sorc, but it's a pretty close call.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »You really cant go wrong with either. It's interesting because one look at these forums would lead you to believe that there are basically two crowds in ESO, the NerfSorc and NerfNB fanboys. Both are certainly able to complete all content. I dont have any data to support this, but I would also bet they are the two most commonly played specs in eso.
The reality is that the two specs play very similarly to one another. Both are best played as ranged DPS builds, and both have their niches in PVP, but neither are top of the food chain.
The first question you have to ask yourself, do you mind playing with pets, as that alone can be your decision maker. If you dont like pets, stop reading and make a NB. A sorc without a pet is basically a crappy version of a mageblade.
PVE:
Sorcs are generally a little easier to play, but NBs have been king of DPS mountain for a long time. In the best hands and the best groups, I still think they are going to be slightly ahead of sorcs as a trial DPS. Most of the upcoming nerfs to NB really dont matter all that much in a good group. That said, most of us dont have perfect dynamic rotation or perfect raids to play in all the time. Sorc rotations are easier on the fingers, and pets add very good survival and damage. I think if your goal is the glassiest of glass cannons, NBs are still on top. But if not, sorcs are probably more accessible for a larger percent of the population. I always recommend mag sorc to anyone that is new to the game or perhaps struggles with button pressing. Sorcs have more versitilty than NBs as Damage Dealers, because you can play heavy attack builds, no pet, 1 pet, 2 pet, etc.
PVP:
In group play, NBs are going to be more damage focused and sorcs are going to be more support focused. In solo play, Sorcs are a bit sturdier and NBs are more elusive. NBs have more flexibility in their PVP builds, as their toolkit is a little more versatile from a PVP standpoint. They have better access to major minor buffs as well. 95% of sorcs are running 8-9 of the same skills, that said, some of those skills are pretty darn strong. If you like kiting people around and picking them off 1 by 1, sorc is probably a bit better. If you want to bomb 10 people at once, NB is better.
Overall, If you are an exceptional button presser, I would go mageblade. If you are not, a sorc is probably a slightly better option.
It can be very hard to make an analysis like this because things change from patch to patch. The one account I have seen with 100% achievement points was a DK, which makes sense, because a good tank is in a great position to get all the PVE achievements. I would say that overall since launch, NB has spent more time on top of more categories than Sorc, but it's a pretty close call.
Wow, thanks for such an amazing analysis. In pvp , I prefer a solo ranged style , that's why I'm choosing from these specs. I've actually invested hundreds of hours in pvp gameplay of both classes , but currently have time and willingness to main only one , that's why it's so hard to decide.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »You really cant go wrong with either. It's interesting because one look at these forums would lead you to believe that there are basically two crowds in ESO, the NerfSorc and NerfNB fanboys. Both are certainly able to complete all content. I dont have any data to support this, but I would also bet they are the two most commonly played specs in eso.
The reality is that the two specs play very similarly to one another. Both are best played as ranged DPS builds, and both have their niches in PVP, but neither are top of the food chain.
The first question you have to ask yourself, do you mind playing with pets, as that alone can be your decision maker. If you dont like pets, stop reading and make a NB. A sorc without a pet is basically a crappy version of a mageblade.
PVE:
Sorcs are generally a little easier to play, but NBs have been king of DPS mountain for a long time. In the best hands and the best groups, I still think they are going to be slightly ahead of sorcs as a trial DPS. Most of the upcoming nerfs to NB really dont matter all that much in a good group. That said, most of us dont have perfect dynamic rotation or perfect raids to play in all the time. Sorc rotations are easier on the fingers, and pets add very good survival and damage. I think if your goal is the glassiest of glass cannons, NBs are still on top. But if not, sorcs are probably more accessible for a larger percent of the population. I always recommend mag sorc to anyone that is new to the game or perhaps struggles with button pressing. Sorcs have more versitilty than NBs as Damage Dealers, because you can play heavy attack builds, no pet, 1 pet, 2 pet, etc.
PVP:
In group play, NBs are going to be more damage focused and sorcs are going to be more support focused. In solo play, Sorcs are a bit sturdier and NBs are more elusive. NBs have more flexibility in their PVP builds, as their toolkit is a little more versatile from a PVP standpoint. They have better access to major minor buffs as well. 95% of sorcs are running 8-9 of the same skills, that said, some of those skills are pretty darn strong. If you like kiting people around and picking them off 1 by 1, sorc is probably a bit better. If you want to bomb 10 people at once, NB is better.
Overall, If you are an exceptional button presser, I would go mageblade. If you are not, a sorc is probably a slightly better option.
It can be very hard to make an analysis like this because things change from patch to patch. The one account I have seen with 100% achievement points was a DK, which makes sense, because a good tank is in a great position to get all the PVE achievements. I would say that overall since launch, NB has spent more time on top of more categories than Sorc, but it's a pretty close call.
Wow, thanks for such an amazing analysis. In pvp , I prefer a solo ranged style , that's why I'm choosing from these specs. I've actually invested hundreds of hours in pvp gameplay of both classes , but currently have time and willingness to main only one , that's why it's so hard to decide.
I main a magblade almost exclusively for pvp, so my perspective is purely pvp oriented. Oreyn’s post is pretty spot on, except for a couple exceptions in my opinion:
A magblade healer or damage/healing mix is probably the strongest pvp spec for magblades
For pure range I think Sorcs are a lot stronger
Magblades as damage dealers are best played as a melee/range mix. So if you want to be pure ranged sorc would be the better choice.
So I’d make the choice around whether you like pets and if you want to mix in melee with range. Myself I’d choose magblade again because I like healing and like stealth classes, magblade is a no-brainer for me.
HEBREWHAMMERRR wrote: »Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »You really cant go wrong with either. It's interesting because one look at these forums would lead you to believe that there are basically two crowds in ESO, the NerfSorc and NerfNB fanboys. Both are certainly able to complete all content. I dont have any data to support this, but I would also bet they are the two most commonly played specs in eso.
The reality is that the two specs play very similarly to one another. Both are best played as ranged DPS builds, and both have their niches in PVP, but neither are top of the food chain.
The first question you have to ask yourself, do you mind playing with pets, as that alone can be your decision maker. If you dont like pets, stop reading and make a NB. A sorc without a pet is basically a crappy version of a mageblade.
PVE:
Sorcs are generally a little easier to play, but NBs have been king of DPS mountain for a long time. In the best hands and the best groups, I still think they are going to be slightly ahead of sorcs as a trial DPS. Most of the upcoming nerfs to NB really dont matter all that much in a good group. That said, most of us dont have perfect dynamic rotation or perfect raids to play in all the time. Sorc rotations are easier on the fingers, and pets add very good survival and damage. I think if your goal is the glassiest of glass cannons, NBs are still on top. But if not, sorcs are probably more accessible for a larger percent of the population. I always recommend mag sorc to anyone that is new to the game or perhaps struggles with button pressing. Sorcs have more versitilty than NBs as Damage Dealers, because you can play heavy attack builds, no pet, 1 pet, 2 pet, etc.
PVP:
In group play, NBs are going to be more damage focused and sorcs are going to be more support focused. In solo play, Sorcs are a bit sturdier and NBs are more elusive. NBs have more flexibility in their PVP builds, as their toolkit is a little more versatile from a PVP standpoint. They have better access to major minor buffs as well. 95% of sorcs are running 8-9 of the same skills, that said, some of those skills are pretty darn strong. If you like kiting people around and picking them off 1 by 1, sorc is probably a bit better. If you want to bomb 10 people at once, NB is better.
Overall, If you are an exceptional button presser, I would go mageblade. If you are not, a sorc is probably a slightly better option.
It can be very hard to make an analysis like this because things change from patch to patch. The one account I have seen with 100% achievement points was a DK, which makes sense, because a good tank is in a great position to get all the PVE achievements. I would say that overall since launch, NB has spent more time on top of more categories than Sorc, but it's a pretty close call.
Wow, thanks for such an amazing analysis. In pvp , I prefer a solo ranged style , that's why I'm choosing from these specs. I've actually invested hundreds of hours in pvp gameplay of both classes , but currently have time and willingness to main only one , that's why it's so hard to decide.
I main a magblade almost exclusively for pvp, so my perspective is purely pvp oriented. Oreyn’s post is pretty spot on, except for a couple exceptions in my opinion:
A magblade healer or damage/healing mix is probably the strongest pvp spec for magblades
For pure range I think Sorcs are a lot stronger
Magblades as damage dealers are best played as a melee/range mix. So if you want to be pure ranged sorc would be the better choice.
So I’d make the choice around whether you like pets and if you want to mix in melee with range. Myself I’d choose magblade again because I like healing and like stealth classes, magblade is a no-brainer for me.
I see you posting a lot about magblades, just curious, have you played a magsorc at all?
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Just for min-maxing ? Mag sorc. Compared to mag blade it feels like easy mode tbh. Mag NB was a thing back in the day when you could make tanky - blood mage builds.
But for overall PvP & PvE... Definitely Mag sorc.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »Just for min-maxing ? Mag sorc. Compared to mag blade it feels like easy mode tbh. Mag NB was a thing back in the day when you could make tanky - blood mage builds.
But for overall PvP & PvE... Definitely Mag sorc.
Well that's not what I'm really looking for, actually. I mean, easy mode is good, but high reward for high learning curve and experience is much better.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »You really cant go wrong with either. It's interesting because one look at these forums would lead you to believe that there are basically two crowds in ESO, the NerfSorc and NerfNB fanboys. Both are certainly able to complete all content. I dont have any data to support this, but I would also bet they are the two most commonly played specs in eso.
The reality is that the two specs play very similarly to one another. Both are best played as ranged DPS builds, and both have their niches in PVP, but neither are top of the food chain.
The first question you have to ask yourself, do you mind playing with pets, as that alone can be your decision maker. If you dont like pets, stop reading and make a NB. A sorc without a pet is basically a crappy version of a mageblade.
PVE:
Sorcs are generally a little easier to play, but NBs have been king of DPS mountain for a long time. In the best hands and the best groups, I still think they are going to be slightly ahead of sorcs as a trial DPS. Most of the upcoming nerfs to NB really dont matter all that much in a good group. That said, most of us dont have perfect dynamic rotation or perfect raids to play in all the time. Sorc rotations are easier on the fingers, and pets add very good survival and damage. I think if your goal is the glassiest of glass cannons, NBs are still on top. But if not, sorcs are probably more accessible for a larger percent of the population. I always recommend mag sorc to anyone that is new to the game or perhaps struggles with button pressing. Sorcs have more versitilty than NBs as Damage Dealers, because you can play heavy attack builds, no pet, 1 pet, 2 pet, etc.
PVP:
In group play, NBs are going to be more damage focused and sorcs are going to be more support focused. In solo play, Sorcs are a bit sturdier and NBs are more elusive. NBs have more flexibility in their PVP builds, as their toolkit is a little more versatile from a PVP standpoint. They have better access to major minor buffs as well. 95% of sorcs are running 8-9 of the same skills, that said, some of those skills are pretty darn strong. If you like kiting people around and picking them off 1 by 1, sorc is probably a bit better. If you want to bomb 10 people at once, NB is better.
Overall, If you are an exceptional button presser, I would go mageblade. If you are not, a sorc is probably a slightly better option.
It can be very hard to make an analysis like this because things change from patch to patch. The one account I have seen with 100% achievement points was a DK, which makes sense, because a good tank is in a great position to get all the PVE achievements. I would say that overall since launch, NB has spent more time on top of more categories than Sorc, but it's a pretty close call.
Wow, thanks for such an amazing analysis. In pvp , I prefer a solo ranged style , that's why I'm choosing from these specs. I've actually invested hundreds of hours in pvp gameplay of both classes , but currently have time and willingness to main only one , that's why it's so hard to decide.
I main a magblade almost exclusively for pvp, so my perspective is purely pvp oriented. Oreyn’s post is pretty spot on, except for a couple exceptions in my opinion:
A magblade healer or damage/healing mix is probably the strongest pvp spec for magblades
For pure range I think Sorcs are a lot stronger
Magblades as damage dealers are best played as a melee/range mix. So if you want to be pure ranged sorc would be the better choice.
So I’d make the choice around whether you like pets and if you want to mix in melee with range. Myself I’d choose magblade again because I like healing and like stealth classes, magblade is a no-brainer for me.
CP is a crutch for people who can’t sustain and want to be "tanky" so they aren’t immediately punished for making mistakes.