Dear everyone in cyrodil

ryzen_gamer_gal

SmellyUnlimited wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.

What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.

That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?

Quite the wordsmith, yet the second paragraph is just a long run-on sentence with horrible comma splicing.

“What we in fact therefor have is in fact....”

In fact!

'when you have the truth, argue the truth. if you dont have the truth, attack their grammar.'

Verbal_Earthworm

Genomic wrote: »

Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.

What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.

That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?

You are far too intelligent for this forum.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not.

Exactly how I like it.

max_only

Alucardo wrote: »

SpringEternal wrote: »

Genomic wrote: »

Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.

What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.

That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?

You are far too intelligent for this forum.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).

Says the person who needlessly dropped their PhD into the conversation .

I'd be dropping it everywhere if I had a PhD. Would most likely change my forum name to DrAlucardo also just to further rub it in peoples faces.

You would.

kargen27

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

Wild_Mage wrote: »

This chatter is tiresome. I have a doctorate degree in bio-molecular primal fusion. I only mention this because I specialize in the E aspect of the PV. PV + E squared to be precise. I hope this clears up the matter.

well then what does pv + e squared equal?

Is it (pv+e)² or pv+e²

mairwen85

Genomic wrote: »

Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.

What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.

That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?

You are far too intelligent for this forum.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).

So much truth in this. I am quite literally paid to explain highly complex, technical concepts to non technical people (investors etc). I can baffle with techno babble as much as I want, but that won't pay the bills having to fall back on jargon usually means the concept is unsound and holes need to be covered up

Not saying I'm intelligent, just that overuse of wordiness is in most cases a defense tactic, not a means of conversation.

In the case of OP, however, I think it's parody.

WembleyOTG

PVE the E stands for Environment. It's from English class and d & d. It's like a type of scenario in a story.

eso_lags

rp

Bergzorn

kargen27 wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

Wild_Mage wrote: »

This chatter is tiresome. I have a doctorate degree in bio-molecular primal fusion. I only mention this because I specialize in the E aspect of the PV. PV + E squared to be precise. I hope this clears up the matter.

well then what does pv + e squared equal?

Is it (pv+e)² or pv+e²

For the velocities relevant ingame, especially after the Swift nerf, the equation for the enablement E is

E= pv/2 + U.

This equation contains the momentum p, a measure of the characters mobility, and the velocity v, simply the momentum divided by the character mass, used here only for reasons of presentation. Note that U is a multi-dimensional potential in this game. It is, in fact, a complicated functional of game mechanics and individual player skill.

While this makes above equation hard to deal with, the developers are employing skill- and class streamlining to find a stationary point of U. Many of the players are asking for a balance where U's functional derivative with respect to class- and skill choice vanishes. Unfortunately, the combat team keeps rushing into local extrema where the functional derivative with respect to player skill vanishes.

ryzen_gamer_gal

Bergzorn wrote: »

kargen27 wrote: »

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

Wild_Mage wrote: »

This chatter is tiresome. I have a doctorate degree in bio-molecular primal fusion. I only mention this because I specialize in the E aspect of the PV. PV + E squared to be precise. I hope this clears up the matter.

well then what does pv + e squared equal?

Is it (pv+e)² or pv+e²

For the velocities relevant ingame, especially after the Swift nerf, the equation for the enablement E is

E= pv/2 + U.

This equation contains the momentum p, a measure of the characters mobility, and the velocity v, simply the momentum divided by the character mass, used here only for reasons of presentation. Note that U is a multi-dimensional potential in this game. It is, in fact, a complicated functional of game mechanics and individual player skill.

While this makes above equation hard to deal with, the developers are employing skill- and class streamlining to find a stationary point of U. Many of the players are asking for a balance where U's functional derivative with respect to class- and skill choice vanishes. Unfortunately, the combat team keeps rushing into local extrema where the functional derivative with respect to player skill vanishes.

ahahahahahaha... love it

NeillMcAttack

This is both the smartest and also dumbest thread I’ve ever seen on this forum!

thedovahmon

Wise_Will

muy engerish iznot sow gud

Ye_Olde_Crowe

ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »

'when you have the truth, argue the truth. if you dont have the truth, attack their grammar.'

I always have the truth which is why I don't see a reason to argue. My boss wasn't pleased when I explained this to him, but I don't care if others are wrong so it didn't really matter ^^.

RoyalPink06

[img][/img]via Imgflip Meme Generator

SFDB

'Explain E=mc^2'

'It says " 'e is two Scotsmen", guvnah!'