Maintenance for the week of January 20:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – January 20
• NA megaservers for maintenance – January 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – January 22, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 14:00 UTC (9:00AM EST)
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – January 20
• NA megaservers for maintenance – January 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – January 22, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 14:00 UTC (9:00AM EST)
Dear everyone in cyrodil
ryzen_gamer_gal
✭✭✭✭
THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
3
-
Verbal_Earthworm✭✭✭✭✭
✭ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.4 -
Siohwenoeht✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I would propose that more thesis, antithesis and then synthesis between the aforementioned would rather elevate than demote the conversation...
"It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time saying anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a long time to say, and to listen to." - Treebeard1 -
Alucardo✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »my next post on this thread will include a venn diagram
Nnnggh... explain to me slowly how many circles your venn diagram will portray, and what the subject of matter is. Is it just me, or is it getting hot in here1 -
ryzen_gamer_gal✭✭✭✭Siohwenoeht wrote: »I would propose that more thesis, antithesis and then synthesis between the aforementioned would rather elevate than demote the conversation...
it doesnt help if you dont make them at least google it.1 -
Bouldercleave✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭
A little off topic, but I would do things to Kristen bell that would frankly just disappoint her, but would make me VERY happy...1 -
Siohwenoeht✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »Siohwenoeht wrote: »I would propose that more thesis, antithesis and then synthesis between the aforementioned would rather elevate than demote the conversation...
it doesnt help if you dont make them at least google it.
Well I would still contend that your thread has not yet reached apotheosis... "It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time saying anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a long time to say, and to listen to." - Treebeard1 -
Genomic✭✭✭✭✭Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
11 -
Mashille✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Edited by Mashille on April 23, 2019 1:23AMHouse Baratheon: 'Ours Is The Fury'4 -
SpringEternal✭✭✭Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Says the person who needlessly dropped their PhD into the conversation .
6 -
Alucardo✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭SpringEternal wrote: »Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Says the person who needlessly dropped their PhD into the conversation .
I'd be dropping it everywhere if I had a PhD. Would most likely change my forum name to DrAlucardo also just to further rub it in peoples faces.12 -
Genomic✭✭✭✭✭SpringEternal wrote: »Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Says the person who needlessly dropped their PhD into the conversation .
Sorry if you took it as showboating. It wasn't. Everyone I work with has a PhD. To me it's not something special, just a necessary workplace certificate. I mentioned it as a context to show that I sometimes work with very smart people (so not really stated needlessly then).
2 -
Salvas_Aren✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Why do so many hate whisps include *Please*? Does it actually work? Shall I give it a try?
Please, no deontology in Cyrodiil. Please.
1 -
kargen27✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Doesn't the E in PvE stand for environment and not for everything?
Players are not environment they are mostly in the way when I am trying to enjoy the environment.and then the parrot said, "must be the water mines green too."7 -
SFDB✭✭✭✭✭
✭Coming tonight: Thesaurus, The Movie! The Film! The Flick! The Motion Picture! The Screen Adaptation!7 -
Cundu_Ertur✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Or as a joke. Very frequently as a joke.Taking stealth away from the Bosmer is like taking magic away from the Altmer, making Nords allergic to mead, or making Orcs pretty.1 -
Ratzkifal✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Doesn't the E in PvE stand for environment and not for everything?
Players are not environment they are mostly in the way when I am trying to enjoy the environment.
@kargen27 Pretty sure the E stands for Entity. OP argues that players are also entities and of course OP is right, but "entity" is kind of dehumanizing, which is why it is implied that players are actually not entities and "entities" refers to "non-player entities" aka NPEs or NPCs in case of characters.This Bosmer was tortured to death. There is nothing left to be done.0 -
ArchMikem✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭SpringEternal wrote: »Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
You are far too intelligent for this forum.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. I have a PhD in genetics. I'm not a genius, but I've worked with many. In my experience the smartest people can convey their message clearly and simply. Those that make a show of using overly complex and jargon-laden language usually do so to hide insecurities or weaknesses (in their arguments or themselves).
Says the person who needlessly dropped their PhD into the conversation .
I'd be dropping it everywhere if I had a PhD. Would most likely change my forum name to DrAlucardo also just to further rub it in peoples faces.
You'd also be enjoying your choking student loan debt for the rest of your life.CP2,000 Master Explorer - AvA One Star General - Console Peasant - The Clan
Quest Objective: OMG Go Talk To That Kitty!3 -
Wild_Mage✭✭This chatter is tiresome. I have a doctorate degree in bio-molecular primal fusion. I only mention this because I specialize in the E aspect of the PV. PV + E squared to be precise. I hope this clears up the matter.2
-
SmellyUnlimited✭✭✭✭ryzen_gamer_gal wrote: »THere is such a thing as pvp but in reality there is no such thing a pve. pve, if it existed, would include pvp since a player is in fact part of everything. Or more directly, the group everything includes the sub group known as players.
What we in fact therefor have is in fact group play, which includes pvp and trials and optionally includes dungeons, delves, public dungeons and for some people storyline quests; as well as solo play which also optionally includes delves and public dungeons and some regular dungeons but mostly consists of storyline quests.
That being so, can we please stop with the hegelian dialectic indoctrination?
Quite the wordsmith, yet the second paragraph is just a long run-on sentence with horrible comma splicing.
“What we in fact therefor have is in fact....”
In fact!DO. NOT. WIPE. (in game OR out!)3 -
ryzen_gamer_gal✭✭✭✭Siohwenoeht wrote: »I would propose that more thesis, antithesis and then synthesis between the aforementioned would rather elevate than demote the conversation...
the hegalian dialetic is evil. it doesnt produce new truth but a new lie and a lie that is ever harder to discern from the truth1
https://youtu.be/BFC9o87388c?t=61
