I made a mistake the video said 200000 instead of 3000 but still
MajesticHaruki wrote: »Population is fine for a game that focuses entirely on milking cows.
And what difference does that 10 million number make when no one's interacting with each other? World of Warcraft is incredibly anti-social. You don't need 10 million people in a game where the organized group content only needs 12 people max.It’s no WOW numbers
AlexanderDeLarge wrote: »
I was just searching for the player base number, and @Alcast, chill bro, I made a mistake
200K is high, perhaps its player in an month as in all players who logged in last month is counted.I made a mistake the video said 200000 instead of 3000 but still
I just saw a YouTube video there was only 2000 players on steam
I just saw a YouTube video there was only 2000 players on steam
SpiderKnight wrote: »Emmagoldman wrote: »Just checked
https://steamcharts.com/app/306130#All
If you set it to all, it's actually been increasing, as in 10k more from the range from 2014-2016
Because more people are making bot accounts.
SpiderKnight wrote: »Emmagoldman wrote: »Just checked
https://steamcharts.com/app/306130#All
If you set it to all, it's actually been increasing, as in 10k more from the range from 2014-2016
Because more people are making bot accounts.
STEAM version of ESO SUCKS. ESO is awesome game but not with steam.
MajesticHaruki wrote: »Population is fine for a game that focuses entirely on milking cows.