usmcjdking wrote: »I honestly have no idea what you are complaining about.
There were some seriously good balance changes here. Magden kinda got left out, but otherwise all the other changes look really good - chisel instead of sledgehammer.
Lol. They said absolutely the opposite in the Live stream, that they made just a couple small changes considering the time they had to work with it.
The big class balance is just once a year, during chapter releases... But since they created this new system to get feedback, they might do incremental updates to some big problems.
usmcjdking wrote: »I honestly have no idea what you are complaining about.
There were some seriously good balance changes here. Magden kinda got left out, but otherwise all the other changes look really good - chisel instead of sledgehammer.
Lol DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME Commenting on this thread cuz as u probably didin't guest it its a Troll, the comment made by gina was for the summerset patch not this one, Like look at the date (May 7) before u start complaining
Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Lol DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME Commenting on this thread cuz as u probably didin't guest it its a Troll, the comment made by gina was for the summerset patch not this one, Like look at the date (May 7) before u start complaining
usmcjdking wrote: »I honestly have no idea what you are complaining about.
There were some seriously good balance changes here. Magden kinda got left out, but otherwise all the other changes look really good - chisel instead of sledgehammer.
look at the pain Points brought up by the community reps, then look back at the patch notes, now look back at the class rep post, back to the patch notes.
What did you notice?
LiquidPony wrote: »
The class reps meeting was on June 7th, wasn't it? It is now July 9th. If you thought that anything significant that came out of that meeting was going to be addressed in this patch, well, I don't know what to tell you.
@BohnT
Before I decided not bothering with the discord chat (even the community reps) were advocating for a long range burning ember while keeping the healing duration in tact. I got into a heated discussion with one community rep because I was baffled at the lack of discussion regarding Stam DK & easily called him/her out on that which ended with obfuscation all day.
sneakymitchell wrote: »It’s just the first PTS week wait one or two more weeks then say something.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »sneakymitchell wrote: »It’s just the first PTS week wait one or two more weeks then say something.
Every damn cycle someone says this. You realize they finalize things so quickly and then refuse to budge close to release time right? Waiting has never been in our favor.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »sneakymitchell wrote: »It’s just the first PTS week wait one or two more weeks then say something.
Every damn cycle someone says this. You realize they finalize things so quickly and then refuse to budge close to release time right? Waiting has never been in our favor.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »sneakymitchell wrote: »It’s just the first PTS week wait one or two more weeks then say something.
Every damn cycle someone says this. You realize they finalize things so quickly and then refuse to budge close to release time right? Waiting has never been in our favor.
This. I felt bad for all the hard work the PTS testers went through the last cycle - only to have almost everything ignored!
usmcjdking wrote: »I honestly have no idea what you are complaining about.
There were some seriously good balance changes here. Magden kinda got left out, but otherwise all the other changes look really good - chisel instead of sledgehammer.
I waste my time any way I feel like it thank you very much!
It's always worth giving feedback, even if it's not acted on right away. If you don't give any feed back then they won't know how you feel about something or what you desire to be changed.
Just be constructive and polite, don't have expectations outside of what's already been established as possible and focus on getting the feedback to who can use it.
When you stop trying to make ESO what you want, and start taking it for what it is and working to improve it in realistic ways you'll be a lot happier with the game (and all games you take that attitude towards).
Performance they've worked on since launch and are still working on, there are dozens of posts from them on it. However it's not a simple fix and they can't just upgrade/add more servers like the armchair tech experts think.IZZEFlameLash wrote: »I waste my time any way I feel like it thank you very much!
It's always worth giving feedback, even if it's not acted on right away. If you don't give any feed back then they won't know how you feel about something or what you desire to be changed.
Just be constructive and polite, don't have expectations outside of what's already been established as possible and focus on getting the feedback to who can use it.
When you stop trying to make ESO what you want, and start taking it for what it is and working to improve it in realistic ways you'll be a lot happier with the game (and all games you take that attitude towards).
Not everyone wants the ESO to be shaped in their own vision. There are general consensus of things that are imbalanced where more than half would agree on. Those things most want changed or adjusted or whatever. Which ZOS haven't done much of. Performance issues and class balances are just things that ZOS made themselves to be seen as non-caring as none are really being worked on as seriously as Crown reskins.
DeathStalker wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »
The class reps meeting was on June 7th, wasn't it? It is now July 9th. If you thought that anything significant that came out of that meeting was going to be addressed in this patch, well, I don't know what to tell you.
I was actually hoping for some of it. I mean not all but some. I am really disapointed in this patch and hope that soon we will get an ETA on when we can see some serious changes based on the class reps meeting and bug fixes.