Is line of sight considered dishonorable in a duel?

Korah_Eaglecry

Ley wrote: »

"I lost because I couldn't get my attacks to connect with my opponent because he kept running around. Running around is cheap and dishonorable! Real talented players stand and face their opponent with their feet firmly in place. True duels should be a testament of my gear/rotation vs yours!"

I call those people sore loosers.

Why isnt he letting me hit him and win?!?!?!?!?!?!!?

Jimmy_The_Fixer

Taboos against LoS aren't really about fairness so much as creating an environment where duels don't last 20 minutes. Any class is able to extend the duel into an infinite stalemate through self-heals and LoS. It's trivially easy to stay alive forever against a single player when you can run around a pillar since it's so effective at mitigating damage and costs 0 resources.

As usual though, anything goes in open world and BGs.

Kiralyn2000

Ah, this brings back memories of people arguing about whether potions were 'allowed' or not in WoW duels.

Minno

only true honorable fights are those using off-meta sets.

Thogard

Jimmy_The_Fixer wrote: »

Taboos against LoS aren't really about fairness so much as creating an environment where duels don't last 20 minutes. Any class is able to extend the duel into an infinite stalemate through self-heals and LoS. It's trivially easy to stay alive forever against a single player when you can run around a pillar since it's so effective at mitigating damage and costs 0 resources.

As usual though, anything goes in open world and BGs.

This.

Most of the dishonorable actions are based around the fact that they would make the duel last forever if both players did it, so to avoid wasting everyone’s time those things are banned.

Some things are so strong that they automatically determine who wins the fight. Resource poisons are an example of this.