RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »I completely understand myself
I know exactly how Windows Activation works. They take hashes of your CPU, Motherboard, Hard Drive and other parts and use those parts to create a secret key that is used to activate Windows on that set of hardware. Most times you can change almost any part but the motherboard before it requires you to call MS or re-activate Windows as there is "leeway" in the hardware id algorithm they use so you don't have to re-activate for swapping a hard drive for example.
Your comparing Apple's to Oranges here...Activating a Copy of Windows has nothing in common in with playing an online game or data mining the way this Redshell dll is.
I am not deluded in the slightest, of course Google analyzes data, but they also make it easy to opt out, and they also didn't bundle a new .DLL program in their latest version of Chrome to harvest all my hardware, harvest all my hardware serial numbers
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »Except you clearly don't. They're not harvesting, they're hashing, creating a UID based on that information, in much the same way Windows does. Client side, when certain things happen, say you look at the details of a crown store item, the 'transaction' is logged to a redshell server under that UID.
Web side, cookies collect the same information and create the same UID, and they log any 'clicks/views' of interest relevant to the original company product/marketing and those get sent to a redshell server under that UID.
Redshell then puts the info together (because they're clearly related) and provides that information to the client (ZoS), say UID (Not this user, with this information we stole) made these associations based on marketing you tried.
Marketing can then see that user with UID was potentially interested in pretty pink dresses in the crown store, but not so interested in the daedric furniture collection.
It's not taking half of what you seem to think it's taking, and the information only goes to the original client (ZoS).
If you insist on being that worried about what's not happening here, feel free to exit via the door. If the door makes you too paranoid, perhaps the window?
Give me a break.
I don't like possible impicatiins of this either, but that's anything but new - Blizzard entertainment for example has their version of this: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/10/blizzard_entert.html
You want for ZoS to take efficient actions against cheaters of any sort? Well, imagine how you would try to accomplish that, if YOU were in charge of this game and regularely get pestered about not doing anything...
Sure, some things are far from optimal, but often if not always the smartest programmers don't make the major decisions.
Littlebluelizard wrote: »Littlebluelizard wrote: »Any collection of personal data should have some sort of oversight. Even if it's just having knowledge of what's happening to you, even if it's not malicious, even if it's not clear how or to what extent it's being used. +1 OP for knowledge sharing.
From the FAQ from Red Shell website:Does Red Shell track my personal information?
No. Red Shell tracks "device" based information about your computer. We do not collect any personal information about gamers. We don't collect names, emails, or addresses. Our service basically says "this computer clicked on a link from this YouTube video and the same computer played your game." We have no interest in tracking people, just computers for the purposes of attribution. All of the data we do collect is hashed for an additional layer of protection.
I don't even think this can be applied on Crown Store buys. They are probably using this to track how effective their ads from YT, FB, and etc are. Assuming what OP is telling is the true, since they provided 0 evidence to support his claim.
EDIT: There is a RedShell.dll in "Zenimax Online\The Elder Scrolls Online\game\client", in both Steam and non-Steam versions the game.
Their and my definitions of "personal information" are different. Stuff that I, personally, do, places where I, personally, go, games that I, personally, play - that is personal data. The definition they're going by is likely more a legal term, like "personally identifying information". The kind of information they collect, as far as we know by what they say, likely can't be used to personally identify us individually from others. However, as people have previously stated, your computer is still targeted, and you can still be targeted by ads and such. The targeting is what I worry about, not about being personally identified by my videogaming habits.
EDIT: Not to say any of this is the case, but it could be, and is as far as I'm aware likely to be the case. Either way -
Any kind of talk disregarding the need for transparency and not exercising due caution when it comes to data collection is dangerous, because in just one step any data collection can turn malicious. Not to say it will, just that it's important to be vigilant in these matters.
Read the link about hash function. They can't obtain personal information about you unless they try really hard. And even then, RedShell is quite common, they would've been exposed and closed the company by now if that was the case. As for transparency, you probably forgot about it or simply didn't read ZOS terms when they updated it. They have a whole section about Monitoring. You can check it out if you want, at section 6. Though I will admit it not clear that they are doing this but it fits the EULA.
There are plenty of other sources that will spy on you and obtain much more information from you than RedShell will. Many apps on your phone ask a lot of access like Local (meaning they can track where you go), your Contacts, Photos, etc. Facebook can even track what you're browsing when you have it open, or simply installed on your APP. FB even has access to your microphone, so they can potentially hear your conversations whenever they feel like it. We have to accept that we will have this kind of data collected from us, or we will go nuts thinking about x app or x game is spying on you.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »For me its more a trust issue then anything else.
ZOS could have made some sort of public statement that they were implementing something like this. would I have liked it? No. would I have voiced concerns? Absolutely. However, even if i disagreed, they would still have my trust as a customer because they would have openly disclosed this fact before hand.
The fact they said nothing, slipped this in without saying a word, hoping no one would notice it has completely killed any trust I had in them. I can no longer trust their updates. I can no longer trust them to not install some sort of tracking/monitoring software on my computer without my knowledge. that's the big one for me.
All they had to do was be up front about this from the get go, and they would maybe still have me as a customer. Now? Simply not going to happen.
I just finished some testing.
1. Deleting or renaming the redshell.dll file causes the game not to load.
2. Editing the host file to blackhole 0.0.0.0 api.redshell.io will block communication of the .dll
HOWEVER, #2 is a violation of their TOS and Privacy policy(they updated in late March with little fan fare) So blocking that Redshell dll may end up getting your account banned.. As i said, I will not play as long as that Redshell is integrated into the game in anyway. I'll check back from time to time to see if its been removed, but until then its a no go for me. no matter how much i like the game, I won't tolerate this. This is not what i signed up for, and certainly not what I paid for. I'd expect this from some F2P game, but not one I had actively paid a subscription for.
I hope they change position on this, but im not holding my breath.
If you want a response quickly, you'd need to send this as a tip to lower-tier bloggers, MMO news sites and other gaming media.
For example, the sites that covered the Guild Wars 2 spyware debacle included: Massively OP, Motherboard (Vice), Kotaku, Bleedingcool, Pcgamesn, TechRaptor, N4G etc.
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »HOWEVER, #2 is a violation of their TOS and Privacy policy(they updated in late March with little fan fare) So blocking that Redshell dll may end up getting your account banned.
LumbermillOverlord wrote: »@Syncronaut hey mate but how you can tell you was really opt-out? dll will still load
you will not see any traffic from it?
its just their words you know
they can lie
This is inconsequential compared to the ways social media platforms and google/search engines collect, track, and sell your information.
You think Google paid a bunch of translators to create Google Translate? Lol, no. The bulk of it came from scanning emails. Terms of Use and such. South park had a great episode about it.
karthrag_inak wrote: »Wow... I swear, all the paranoid people out there... now I know why so many people actually believe conspiracy theories.
I'm sure ZOS' TOS that we agree to, and they recently updated, includes a provision for them to utilize this. If you accepted the TOS, then you agreed to it, if you block it, then by all means they have the right to block access to THEIR game. If you wish to quit because of it, SEE YA!
I've been a data scientist for >4 years and this is nothing "paranoid". You can prove via information theory beyond a certain level of doubt the required info to uniquely identify a user just by their browser configuration (i.e. fonts installed, browser type, etc.) and, using this information, any surfing behavior can be attributed by multiple sources to a single individual. This is some of the information redshell is collecting.
There are minimal laws restricting the sharing of this "innocuous" information so it can be shared with multiple interested parties with impunity, who can aggregate this data and build profiles of hundreds of millions of people with surprising accuracy. I've done this before.
People are surprisingly "linear" in their behavior, and very simple models can be used to not only connect seemingly diverse behaviors with high accuracy, but also to predict future behaviors. Using a single hidden layer NN I was able to predict future purchases for a large commercial website (sundance) with around 95% accuracy, among their hundreds of thousands of customers.
I was also able, with minimal effort, to link their desktop and mobile devices, which always broadcast timestamped geo location information, illustrating locations and timing patterns.
The stories I could tell. This is uncool.
LumbermillOverlord wrote: »any lawyers here btw? who can explain consequences