SydneyGrey wrote: »How are they exploiting?
I'm seriously asking. I haven't done that trial yet, so I don't know what's going on with it. If they're selling it legitimately without using an exploit, then that's their business and there's nothing wrong with that.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »Not cool... something should be done.
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I am talking about exploiting
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree. While exploiting players for money is different than exploiting the mechanics of the game which is bannable, I really see no difference between them. Both lower the value, rarity, and achievement of gaining the skin.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree. While exploiting players for money is different than exploiting the mechanics of the game which is bannable, I really see no difference between them. Both lower the value, rarity, and achievement of gaining the skin.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree. While exploiting players for money is different than exploiting the mechanics of the game which is bannable, I really see no difference between them. Both lower the value, rarity, and achievement of gaining the skin.
Waffennacht wrote: »I don't know why you would want a skin you didn't earn unless it was for RP purposes.
I personally find almost all of them absolutely hideous. And that Dro Mathra one... like two characters can pull it off without looking horrid
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree. While exploiting players for money is different than exploiting the mechanics of the game which is bannable, I really see no difference between them. Both lower the value, rarity, and achievement of gaining the skin.
By the same means, I get exploited when I buy stuff at a guild trader.
You trade your gold for an item, service, etc. Why is a skin different than a stack of Dreugh Wax? I’d argue that some things take much longer to obtain than a trial skin, but we can purchase those anyway (like that stack of Dreugh Wax).
Selling skins is fine as long as:
1. There is no account sharing (against TOS)
2. There is no real money involved (against TOS)
3. There are obviously no exploits involved (against TOS)
Some people hate the idea of selling skins but have never thought of it this way. It’s the exact same thing.
In fact it makes me very happy to see selling skins as a common practice. There are people who have plenty of gold but who will NEVER have the time, skill, care, or whatever to run these 12-man pieces of group content. It’s very difficult stuff that these skins are locked behind, and takes a certain type of player to enjoy. If you are a full time PvPer you will never get a cool skin, but because of this, you can convert your AP into Gold, and then Gold into the skin you so desperately want. Everyone wins.
Plus ever since trial gear became BoP, the need for gold by trial groups is pretty dire. Most of my team is poor asf lol, though you’d think people play so much are rich.
Ihatenightblades wrote: »
EDIT - selling a skin by actually doing the trial is great for the game and players can use their skill to get rich. Fair game.
I don't agree. While exploiting players for money is different than exploiting the mechanics of the game which is bannable, I really see no difference between them. Both lower the value, rarity, and achievement of gaining the skin.
By the same means, I get exploited when I buy stuff at a guild trader.
You trade your gold for an item, service, etc. Why is a skin different than a stack of Dreugh Wax? I’d argue that some things take much longer to obtain than a trial skin, but we can purchase those anyway (like that stack of Dreugh Wax).
Selling skins is fine as long as:
1. There is no account sharing (against TOS)
2. There is no real money involved (against TOS)
3. There are obviously no exploits involved (against TOS)
Some people hate the idea of selling skins but have never thought of it this way. It’s the exact same thing.
Waffennacht wrote: »I don't know why you would want a skin you didn't earn unless it was for RP purposes.
I personally find almost all of them absolutely hideous. And that Dro Mathra one... like two characters can pull it off without looking horrid
You mean they are collecting a bunch of data within data? They experience pleasure from it? Good for them. Stop thinking about it, and you too may experience other pleasures=)