I read this thread and see some people saying "We don't want all armor to be skintight boob hugging armor" and defending the way the armor's look.
I really think you should take the time to actually look at the armors. What you'll find in some of the cases is the medium & heavy armor's 'contour' to show female breasts, while the light armor has a weird distorted shape over the chest area. So it's ok for medium and heavy armor to have boob contours but not light armor?
For example, Ra Gada:
Female Light vs Female Heavy:
vs
Worm Cult:
Light vs Heavy:
vs
Worm Cult isn't as obvious, but you can clearly see boob line/sculpting on the heavy armor, with weird balloon over chest of the light. It's way more obvious when you look at the front:
vs
But no, nothing to fix here right? *rolls eyes* How about actual consistency with how armor's look on female characters using the same skin regardless of what weight armor.
Also, it's plainly obvious that the "balloon" chest effect is where they have used the males mesh/texture (I'm not a graphic artist, so not sure which is the correct term here) for the female and just 'expanded' the chest area to show difference from the males. Sloppy and lazy... and something I believe they did previously admit to doing.
mesmerizedish wrote: »Breasts are squishy. If you tighten cloth or leather over them, they will flatten. If you do not tighten cloth or leather over them, that cloth or leather will not magically tighten beneath the breasts to accentuate their shape. Instead you get a slight bulge where breast tissue is being compressed and then a mostly straight line down to the waist if secured by a belt. Metal does not deform (much), so of course the heavy armor will look bustier if it’s molded to be such (which is its own problem, but I don’t think ESO is that bad in this respect).
The Ra Gada light chestpiece is an accurate representation of what such an article of clothing would look like on someone with gigantic breasts. It really ought to be flatter for an average person’s chest.
Y’all should learn how breasts work, good heavens.
enjoyingcoma9 wrote: »mesmerizedish wrote: »Breasts are squishy. If you tighten cloth or leather over them, they will flatten. If you do not tighten cloth or leather over them, that cloth or leather will not magically tighten beneath the breasts to accentuate their shape. Instead you get a slight bulge where breast tissue is being compressed and then a mostly straight line down to the waist if secured by a belt. Metal does not deform (much), so of course the heavy armor will look bustier if it’s molded to be such (which is its own problem, but I don’t think ESO is that bad in this respect).
The Ra Gada light chestpiece is an accurate representation of what such an article of clothing would look like on someone with gigantic breasts. It really ought to be flatter for an average person’s chest.
Y’all should learn how breasts work, good heavens.
You should go and actually test out those styles, no matter the breast size on the character, the end result is a grossly distended chest which ignores the actual shape of the character.
And, yes, I know how breasts work.
enjoyingcoma9 wrote: »Well that's awkward, I completely read your comment the wrong way @mesmerizedish. My apologies.
enjoyingcoma9 wrote: »This was raised a few years ago and looks like it closed off with no real action - with the outfit system now in place it is painfully obvious that a number of the fabulous motifs (including worm cult! So so sad) are just not morphed properly to female characters. Honestly, it looks like the entire torso is a shapeless balloon. Please remorph (no change to the style) to allow female characters to utilise all motifs without looking like bizarre gas filled weirdos.
Specially these are the most problematic:
Bad
Aldmeri (completely flat)
Daggerfall
Ebonheart
Hlaalu
Ra gada
Not great
Abahs watch
Ashlander
Order of the hour
Worm cult
xenowarrior92eb17_ESO wrote: »
i like how worm cult heavy looks on ma kitteh! besides this game needs more bulkier heavy armors...and stomping boots!
mesmerizedish wrote: »Breasts are squishy. If you tighten cloth or leather over them, they will flatten. If you do not tighten cloth or leather over them, that cloth or leather will not magically tighten beneath the breasts to accentuate their shape. Instead you get a slight bulge where breast tissue is being compressed and then a mostly straight line down to the waist if secured by a belt. Metal does not deform (much), so of course the heavy armor will look bustier if it’s molded to be such (which is its own problem, but I don’t think ESO is that bad in this respect).
The Ra Gada light chestpiece is an accurate representation of what such an article of clothing would look like on someone with gigantic breasts. It really ought to be flatter for an average person’s chest.
Y’all should learn how breasts work, good heavens.
I read this thread and see some people saying "We don't want all armor to be skintight boob hugging armor" and defending the way the armor's look.
I really think you should take the time to actually look at the armors. What you'll find in some of the cases is the medium & heavy armor's 'contour' to show female breasts, while the light armor has a weird distorted shape over the chest area. So it's ok for medium and heavy armor to have boob contours but not light armor?
For example, Ra Gada:
Female Light vs Female Heavy:
Worm Cult:
Light vs Heavy:
Worm Cult isn't as obvious, but you can clearly see boob line/sculpting on the heavy armor, with weird balloon over chest of the light. It's way more obvious when you look at the front:
But no, nothing to fix here right? *rolls eyes* How about actual consistency with how armor's look on female characters using the same skin regardless of what weight armor.
Also, it's plainly obvious that the "balloon" chest effect is where they have used the males mesh/texture (I'm not a graphic artist, so not sure which is the correct term here) for the female and just 'expanded' the chest area to show difference from the males. Sloppy and lazy... and something I believe they did previously admit to doing.
platonicidealgirlfriend wrote: »tbh i like having armor sets that actually fit like armor instead of like spandex. I don't need my character's breasts saran-wrapped in steel plate
platonicidealgirlfriend wrote: »platonicidealgirlfriend wrote: »tbh i like having armor sets that actually fit like armor instead of like spandex. I don't need my character's breasts saran-wrapped in steel plate
I'm certain the majority of players are talking non steel armor. In what world does cloth NOT fit to form? Leather? Armor is more than just a steel plated suit.
There is nothing sexualized about having armor that fits the female form properly. You didn't explicitly state that, but it is definitely implied with that spandex comment.
How is armor fitted to the female form a bad thing? No one is asking for skin to be showing or for breasts to be popping out, just simply asking for cloth and leather armor to behave like cloth and leather should.
real question: do you have a pair of breasts and have you ever worn a leather jacket over them? cuz in my experience, each one of my nice leather jackets flattens me a bit even when they're very well tailored.
have this random pap shot of TS to illustrate my point.