Magicka Templar dps

Runefang

swirve wrote: »

Just play magsorc... its the intended magic DPS class, everything else is just for fun.

Lol they're not even the no. 1 magicka dps class let alone the top dps class overall.

Drdeath20

Templars need some loving

Velvelya

DoctorESO wrote: »

EvoAZN wrote: »

Do any of these exist in pve or pvp? I heard sweeps and Jesus beam is bugged. Can anyone clarify?

What's the deal with Radiant Destruction being called Jesus beam? I know that term has been around a while, but why? I don't think Jesus ever beamed anyone down to death.

because it used to be so OP it could get you through walls and junk. Srsly, RD was the thing that gave people nightmares lol. one min you're walking around mostly fine, next sec ded.

Blackbird_V

Magplar PvE is good again. Even if they were bad I'd still play them tbh.

This is the build I use: http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Special:EsoBuildData?id=23159

Did a solo parse (was getting synergies for moondancer) and got 37k first try. Mistakes were made like double casting spear... somehow:

* Yes I used lover for dummy, and no it's not "cheesing"..

So yeah magplars are in a good spot. I still think dual wield is the way forward, with moondancer. Just sadly a lot of people cannot play them

Armatesz

I do pretty well with my breton magplar overall. Won't lie there are some situations where I wish I could stealth, although don't think I would want to have pets like a sorc can. I can solo vet tempest island well enough.

Runefang

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Magplar PvE is good again. Even if they were bad I'd still play them tbh.

This is the build I use: http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Special:EsoBuildData?id=23159

Did a solo parse (was getting synergies for moondancer) and got 37k first try. Mistakes were made like double casting spear... somehow:

* Yes I used lover for dummy, and no it's not "cheesing"..

So yeah magplars are in a good spot. I still think dual wield is the way forward, with moondancer. Just sadly a lot of people cannot play them

I think that we'll see Master Architect + Mechanical Acuity pull ahead but Moondancer + Mechanical Acuity will be a close second. It's hard to top 100% crit chance AND 15% extra damage, proccing them together is easy when Acuity is front-barred and the cheap ulti is on that bar.

Blackbird_V

Runefang wrote: »

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Magplar PvE is good again. Even if they were bad I'd still play them tbh.

This is the build I use: http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Special:EsoBuildData?id=23159

Did a solo parse (was getting synergies for moondancer) and got 37k first try. Mistakes were made like double casting spear... somehow:

* Yes I used lover for dummy, and no it's not "cheesing"..

So yeah magplars are in a good spot. I still think dual wield is the way forward, with moondancer. Just sadly a lot of people cannot play them

I think that we'll see Master Architect + Mechanical Acuity pull ahead but Moondancer + Mechanical Acuity will be a close second. It's hard to top 100% crit chance AND 15% extra damage, proccing them together is easy when Acuity is front-barred and the cheap ulti is on that bar.

I've tested Mechanical and Architect on Magplar and it wasn't preforming anywhere near Moondancer. Sure 15% for 2 others is nice, but you lose sustain and DPS also, for dual wield you cannot afford losing sustain.

I think I got max 33.6k or so with Master Architect. Couldn't make other combinations work like 5 Architect both bars and Mechanical Front... Just seems so much weaker.

Drdeath20

Templars need some loving maybe a 6% boost to spell damage passive. Nothing major but enough to put them over that 40k threshold

Runefang

Drdeath20 wrote: »

Templars need some loving maybe a 6% boost to spell damage passive. Nothing major but enough to put them over that 40k threshold

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Runefang wrote: »

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Magplar PvE is good again. Even if they were bad I'd still play them tbh.

This is the build I use: http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Special:EsoBuildData?id=23159

Did a solo parse (was getting synergies for moondancer) and got 37k first try. Mistakes were made like double casting spear... somehow:

* Yes I used lover for dummy, and no it's not "cheesing"..

So yeah magplars are in a good spot. I still think dual wield is the way forward, with moondancer. Just sadly a lot of people cannot play them

I think that we'll see Master Architect + Mechanical Acuity pull ahead but Moondancer + Mechanical Acuity will be a close second. It's hard to top 100% crit chance AND 15% extra damage, proccing them together is easy when Acuity is front-barred and the cheap ulti is on that bar.

I've tested Mechanical and Architect on Magplar and it wasn't preforming anywhere near Moondancer. Sure 15% for 2 others is nice, but you lose sustain and DPS also, for dual wield you cannot afford losing sustain.

I think I got max 33.6k or so with Master Architect. Couldn't make other combinations work like 5 Architect both bars and Mechanical Front... Just seems so much weaker.

There are some Dragon Bones 43k non-cheesed melee Magplar parses and 40k ranged Magplar parses out there already, give it a few more weeks and I think we'll see Magplars really hit their strides.

Blackbird_V

Runefang wrote: »

Drdeath20 wrote: »

Templars need some loving maybe a 6% boost to spell damage passive. Nothing major but enough to put them over that 40k threshold

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Runefang wrote: »

Valkyn_Eltrys wrote: »

Magplar PvE is good again. Even if they were bad I'd still play them tbh.

This is the build I use: http://en.uesp.net/wiki/Special:EsoBuildData?id=23159

Did a solo parse (was getting synergies for moondancer) and got 37k first try. Mistakes were made like double casting spear... somehow:

* Yes I used lover for dummy, and no it's not "cheesing"..

So yeah magplars are in a good spot. I still think dual wield is the way forward, with moondancer. Just sadly a lot of people cannot play them

I think that we'll see Master Architect + Mechanical Acuity pull ahead but Moondancer + Mechanical Acuity will be a close second. It's hard to top 100% crit chance AND 15% extra damage, proccing them together is easy when Acuity is front-barred and the cheap ulti is on that bar.

I've tested Mechanical and Architect on Magplar and it wasn't preforming anywhere near Moondancer. Sure 15% for 2 others is nice, but you lose sustain and DPS also, for dual wield you cannot afford losing sustain.

I think I got max 33.6k or so with Master Architect. Couldn't make other combinations work like 5 Architect both bars and Mechanical Front... Just seems so much weaker.

There are some Dragon Bones 43k non-cheesed melee Magplar parses and 40k ranged Magplar parses out there already, give it a few more weeks and I think we'll see Magplars really hit their strides.

Yeah definitely going to be playing around with some stuff. Sure I'm not Altmer so losing some DPS, but hey ***. Magplars are finally back!!!


Now stop nerfing DK goddamit

FakeFox

Velvelya wrote: »

DoctorESO wrote: »

EvoAZN wrote: »

Do any of these exist in pve or pvp? I heard sweeps and Jesus beam is bugged. Can anyone clarify?

What's the deal with Radiant Destruction being called Jesus beam? I know that term has been around a while, but why? I don't think Jesus ever beamed anyone down to death.

because it used to be so OP it could get you through walls and junk. Srsly, RD was the thing that gave people nightmares lol. one min you're walking around mostly fine, next sec ded.

Oh, good old times. When you used RD from 50%. </3

Qbiken

If it weren´t for that damned vMA bow melee magplar would perhaps stand a chance against melee stamina builds xD

That bow is ridiculously strong................

But I´ve made some close to 40k single target with melee magplar (non-cheese) the last few days so things looking good so far......