The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed.
Twenty0zTsunami wrote: »jakeedmundson wrote: »The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed.
It absolutely does.... think of anything you've ever purchased. Supply and demand affects video games too.
Morrowind, for example, was $40 when it came out... it wasn't worth it to me so i dropped eso for about 8 months. I found it around x-mas time at Costco for 10 bucks. So here i am again until the next "chapter" comes out for another $40.
Does it? The entire reasont he content has value to you is because you have not experienced it. Just because you wait 3 years doesn't mean the value of the experience goes down for you lol
Yea, I don't really like the lock-in aspect of a subscription, where I have to keep paying even if I only want to play the game 1 hour a week ;-) I try not to dedicate my time to just one game these days. Subscription is a bad deal, for me. I'd rather just purchase the content packs... But this pricing is a bit of an eye-popper. Going to pass for now and check if there is some sort of sale in the future.
It's just too much for me.
you don´t have to buy all at once
if you go eating in restaurant you don´t have to order the whole cart just to get your belly filled
buy what you need and a few months later you buy something else perhaps
it is up to you, your freedom to choose
If it's my choice to choose what DLC I buy, then it's my choice to choose what food I eat, and how much of the menu I buy.
I'd still react negatively if I looked at the menu and saw their Apple Pie costing $450. I'm not really commenting on how much I want to buy. I'm commenting on the cost of it. It seems a bit high, to me...
I think you're losing sight of the core issue/question/topic of the thread.
Why is my choice to buy all the DLC a problem? Buying it piece by piece doesn't make it any cheaper... It's still the same price. I just want to know why it's so bloody expensive when almost every other game I play lets you do a content access catch-up for $20-40.
I'm not going to invest in it if it's going to end up being a $110 content catch up when I can buy a WoW expansion for $50 that includes everything, or GW2 Path of Fire for $30, etc. etc.
The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed. Also none of the content is required or needed to be purchased as one bulk group, simply by them as you want/need what they offer you.
If you own no DLC then as bellatrixed mentioned try an ESO+ subscription, it's worth a lot more for those who have never purchased a DLC.
You can also wait for the DLC sales that normally come during their anniversaries, although those are not confirmed events or sales. Stack on this buying crowns during a Crown Sale and you'll apply double discounts.
jakeedmundson wrote: »Twenty0zTsunami wrote: »jakeedmundson wrote: »The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed.
It absolutely does.... think of anything you've ever purchased. Supply and demand affects video games too.
Morrowind, for example, was $40 when it came out... it wasn't worth it to me so i dropped eso for about 8 months. I found it around x-mas time at Costco for 10 bucks. So here i am again until the next "chapter" comes out for another $40.
Does it? The entire reasont he content has value to you is because you have not experienced it. Just because you wait 3 years doesn't mean the value of the experience goes down for you lol
You're confusing personal value with hype/perceived value.
You really can't think of ONE thing you've bought and saw it 2 months later for a third of the price? This happens to EVERYTHING.
If Sorc wasn't such an awful pet class and BGs weren't DLC content, this would make a lot more sense to me.The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed. Also none of the content is required or needed to be purchased as one bulk group, simply by them as you want/need what they offer you.
If you own no DLC then as bellatrixed mentioned try an ESO+ subscription, it's worth a lot more for those who have never purchased a DLC.
You can also wait for the DLC sales that normally come during their anniversaries, although those are not confirmed events or sales. Stack on this buying crowns during a Crown Sale and you'll apply double discounts.
Subscription isn't an option for me. I'm sure it's great for some people, but I'm not subscribing. It's too restrictive and forces you to bleed cash on something you only want to play super a little at times, simply to retain access to it.
If Sorc wasn't such an awful pet class and BGs weren't DLC content, this would make a lot more sense to me.The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed. Also none of the content is required or needed to be purchased as one bulk group, simply by them as you want/need what they offer you.
If you own no DLC then as bellatrixed mentioned try an ESO+ subscription, it's worth a lot more for those who have never purchased a DLC.
You can also wait for the DLC sales that normally come during their anniversaries, although those are not confirmed events or sales. Stack on this buying crowns during a Crown Sale and you'll apply double discounts.
Subscription isn't an option for me. I'm sure it's great for some people, but I'm not subscribing. It's too restrictive and forces you to bleed cash on something you only want to play super a little at times, simply to retain access to it.
It made complete sense.
1. Sorcs have been a great pet class for over a year now. Your opinion on this matter is not supported by how the game actually plays.
2. BGs cannot be purchased with crowns, cold hard cash only. It makes total sense they are not part of the base game as there are a number of players that PvP only and have no need or desire to spend money on anything. It makes sense Zos put new PvP content behind a pay wall since it would be silly to do it for free.
Complaining about the small cost of playing this game seems more like entitlement. I want access but don't want to pay the small price tag. (BTW, there is a bundle of the early DLCs and some of them go on sale when their anniversary hits).
If Sorc wasn't such an awful pet class and BGs weren't DLC content, this would make a lot more sense to me.The content doesn't become less valuable just because time has passed. Also none of the content is required or needed to be purchased as one bulk group, simply by them as you want/need what they offer you.
If you own no DLC then as bellatrixed mentioned try an ESO+ subscription, it's worth a lot more for those who have never purchased a DLC.
You can also wait for the DLC sales that normally come during their anniversaries, although those are not confirmed events or sales. Stack on this buying crowns during a Crown Sale and you'll apply double discounts.
Subscription isn't an option for me. I'm sure it's great for some people, but I'm not subscribing. It's too restrictive and forces you to bleed cash on something you only want to play super a little at times, simply to retain access to it.
It made complete sense.
1. Sorcs have been a great pet class for over a year now. Your opinion on this matter is not supported by how the game actually plays.
2. BGs cannot be purchased with crowns, cold hard cash only. It makes total sense they are not part of the base game as there are a number of players that PvP only and have no need or desire to spend money on anything. It makes sense Zos put new PvP content behind a pay wall since it would be silly to do it for free.
Complaining about the small cost of playing this game seems more like entitlement. I want access but don't want to pay the small price tag. (BTW, there is a bundle of the early DLCs and some of them go on sale when their anniversary hits).
$100 is not a small cost. It's just a game. It's not a passport application. There are others. I didn't come here to be convinced. I'm just voicing an opinion, which means it's not fact and therefore it's not debatable - nor do I expect anyone to agree with it.
You're free to hold opposing opinion. Enjoy it.
Yea, I don't really like the lock-in aspect of a subscription, where I have to keep paying even if I only want to play the game 1 hour a week ;-) I try not to dedicate my time to just one game these days. Subscription is a bad deal, for me. I'd rather just purchase the content packs... But this pricing is a bit of an eye-popper. Going to pass for now and check if there is some sort of sale in the future.
It's just too much for me.
you don´t have to buy all at once
if you go eating in restaurant you don´t have to order the whole cart just to get your belly filled
buy what you need and a few months later you buy something else perhaps
it is up to you, your freedom to choose
If it's my choice to choose what DLC I buy, then it's my choice to choose what food I eat, and how much of the menu I buy.
I'd still react negatively if I looked at the menu and saw their Apple Pie costing $450. I'm not really commenting on how much I want to buy. I'm commenting on the cost of it. It seems a bit high, to me...
I think you're losing sight of the core issue/question/topic of the thread.
Why is my choice to buy all the DLC a problem? Buying it piece by piece doesn't make it any cheaper... It's still the same price. I just want to know why it's so bloody expensive when almost every other game I play lets you do a content access catch-up for $20-40.
I'm not going to invest in it if it's going to end up being a $110 content catch up when I can buy a WoW expansion for $50 that includes everything, or GW2 Path of Fire for $30, etc. etc.