VaranisArano wrote: »As a Dunmer MagDK, I love vampires. Come, burn in my cleansing fire.
GiantFruitFly wrote: »None of my characters are vampires, and I intend to keep it that way.
I don't like vampire because of how it seems to be used as a de facto enhancement without much of a major drawback. The passives and the mist form appear pretty good.
I think it'd be better if vampires had a more noticeable drawback that isn't visual or by having vampire are not able to access another exclusive skill line for non-vampires.
Twenty0zTsunami wrote: »no major drawback? I've literally played a vampire since I started the game in 2015, and I have to ask: do you have any idea what their fire susceptibility, and reduced HP regen feels like? It's literally like playing on a harder mode, especially if you're a stam build.
YOu wanna talk about ez-mode, let's take a long hard look at lycanthropy.
Seriously, who is left that isn't a vampire?
is there any chance we can get some inherently non evil variants of this like say acolytes of Stendarr or Arkay or something comparable without having to be a vampire.
Its out of control.
Feel free to discuss.
Rohamad_Ali wrote: »
RinaldoGandolphi wrote: »You see so many vamps in PvP because of the over abundance of ridiculous roots and snares...like literally every skill has a snare attached to it, and if your a magic build that’s not a Sorc,if you want to be able to move you need Mist Form