1. He really should have entitled this "worst 5-piece set bonuses", not "worst sets". Some of these things are perfectly fine as secondary sets once you have your primary 5-piece in (in those cases where you can't run 5/5 or 5/3/2/1 or what have you). He, in fact, says as much - his complaint in almost every case is with the 5-bonus.
2. It's interesting how many heavy armour sets made the list. Proportionately speaking.
3. One common complaint of his is not about how the 5-bonus works per se, but rather the actual amount of buff/shield/damage/healing. Which is mostly not an invalid point of view, except that, presumably, ZOS did not pull these values out of thin air but rather based on some testing, benchmarking, balancing, et cetera. In other words, they seem to feel the numbers are what they are supposed to be (or else they would change them) - unless one assumes that they do no testing, server stats analysis, whatever else, which is a pretty grim assumption to make.
In other words, it is an interesting position to take - this is an awful set because the buff/shield/damage/healing number ZOS gave it is not what I think it ought to be.
4. Plenty of sets - non-heavy armoured ones, naturally - left off the list that arguably have equally bad or worse 5-bonuses. Defiler, for example, which drops just everywhere in Morrowind and is...atmospheric but not especially useful in an actual fight. And then there's Sithis' Touch, which I just do not understand. As just two for-instances.
I'm not even mentioning certain sets where the overall direction, before you get to the 5-bonus, feels...let's call it nonstandard. Like the two Undaunted ones, magicka on medium armour and stamina on light and...all for the sake of buffing LA/HA damage. Let us just suppose there are hybrid builds out there that make stuff like this work.
5. His explanation for the jewelry sets he brought in felt weak. Why, why is spell power + crit (that's the one he mentioned, right?) weaker than spell power + magicka? I distinctly recall a lengthy post (on another forum) by one Asayre that went through the maths of it and the relationship between them is somewhat complex (or used to be, at least), which necessarily means one is not obviously worse than the other.
TLDR - catchy and not necessarily wrong. But...sort of narrow in scope. I suppose I expected something more in-depth than simply saying "I think this 5-piece bonus sucks" ten (eleven!)(well, technically nine...) times in a row.
Not all sets are supposed to be super usefull or popular. They just want to offer lots of variety and options.
It's much worse when there are still many useless abilities and even less usefull morphs that are outshined by the other.
Not all sets are supposed to be super usefull or popular. They just want to offer lots of variety and options.
It's much worse when there are still many useless abilities and even less usefull morphs that are outshined by the other.
True most things have a use. Just have to make sure or well judge if it's working as intended still. Like stendarr for awhile nobody used because looked like only could debuff an Ally ever 30, but tooltip was updated to any ally not on cool down every 30 secs.
Ragnarock41 wrote: »I would add black rose to that list.
I mean its my favourite garbage set.
Ragnarock41 wrote: »I would add black rose to that list.
I mean its my favourite garbage set.
Not all sets are supposed to be super usefull or popular. They just want to offer lots of variety and options.
It's much worse when there are still many useless abilities and even less usefull morphs that are outshined by the other.
True most things have a use. Just have to make sure or well judge if it's working as intended still. Like stendarr for awhile nobody used because looked like only could debuff an Ally ever 30, but tooltip was updated to any ally not on cool down every 30 secs.
It's safe to say, that each set has some niche use in very certain situations.
However, they are not meta friendly. Which I guess is what people judge on (I did not watch the video)
Lord_Dexter wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »I would add black rose to that list.
I mean its my favourite garbage set.
I sold its sharpen 1h for lile 100k (PC NA)
JackDaniell wrote: »Oh yeah another top 10 for ESO! Were looking at the most useless sets in the game and talking about why they are so bad. If you guys think I missed any sets or have build ideas for these bad sets please share them! Enjoy everyone!
MalakithAlamahdi wrote: »
goldenarcher1 wrote: »I'm determined to make this work...somehow.