silver1surfer69 wrote: »
i see the kind of logic in this, but im past this point for years, thats at least my oppinion. im a stand and fight guy as well. But there are imho so many things in this game where this applies. EG invisibility by all sources including NB. So whats the argumentation when someone goes invisibilbe and then wins? So im at this point and that for a long time now, use what the game offers u. Thats like playing a ball game like soccer. When its in the rules u can use it. Thats like i dont use the penalty kick because there is only the goal keeper to defend. Or we won cause of penalty kick, thats not really winning. If anybody would stand and fight and the game would be balanced i would completely be happy and no one would need to look and compare stronger or weaker methods in this game.