@crown Most of the support builds and new gear has already been tested along with the new skill line. The templar healer PVP build has already been decided. The top three are pretty easy to discern at this point doubt any of the older sets like spell power, sanctuary or gos will even stay on the radar after 18.
Vilestride wrote: »Small-scale guide:
1. Be Stamden
2. 2vX
3. X=1
easy.
Vilestride wrote: »Small-scale guide:
1. Be Stamden
2. 2vX
3. X=1
easy.
When you’re right, you’re right. And yet some “top” PvP guilds are still unwilling to enter 6v6 or 4v4 tournaments because they can’t figure out that formula.
A real head scratcher, huh?
Because there are different aspects to AvA and not all of them are appealing to all players. Nothing else needs to be said, really. There's nothing inherently wrong with any of them and no aspect is morally -- or otherwise -- superior to the other.montiferus wrote: »Lol. I got a good chuckle out of that one. It amuses when they say large scale is harder than small scale yet if it was so easy why not come to these 6v6 events so we can all bare witness to their dominance?? Curious.
Vilestride wrote: »Sensitive satori's all over the place.
I suppose while reminding me how few large scale groups were in the 6v6 you will also remind me how many top small scale groups have attended any 12v12 events.
C'mon kids. Let's just take a little banter without getting a frog in our sock.
Vilestride wrote: »All of them! Damn, that's so weird I must have looked around everywhere except where you were every time. Silly Vilestride. What a *** I am. Sorry champ...lol.
Unless by all you mean..just the last one.
Vilestride wrote: »All of them! Damn, that's so weird I must have looked around everywhere except where you were every time. Silly Vilestride. What a *** I am. Sorry champ...lol.
Unless by all you mean..just the last one.
no ive been at all of the ones posted in the gvg discord. im usually up on a rock watching. i often get bored tho...
Vilestride wrote: »Sensitive satori's all over the place.
I suppose while reminding me how few large scale groups were in the 6v6 you will also remind me how many top small scale groups have attended any 12v12 events.
C'mon kids. Let's just take a little banter without getting a frog in our sock.
I’ve been at all of them actually. My 6 man combined with animosity to 12v13 and you probably remember what happened. Needless to say, a fight did not. Not going to bring it up because last time it was brought up we took 5 pages arguing about what happened lol
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Vilestride wrote: »Sensitive satori's all over the place.
I suppose while reminding me how few large scale groups were in the 6v6 you will also remind me how many top small scale groups have attended any 12v12 events.
C'mon kids. Let's just take a little banter without getting a frog in our sock.
I’ve been at all of them actually. My 6 man combined with animosity to 12v13 and you probably remember what happened. Needless to say, a fight did not. Not going to bring it up because last time it was brought up we took 5 pages arguing about what happened lol
Err what? You guys have never challenged us to 12v12 if we had been fighting we would have gladly accepted as we have accepted every other challenge made.
6v6 is not interesting to me. It is less interesting with so many rules. I have the feeling that even if we fought 6v6 our tactics would likely soon be banned because something is unfair or players would demand that it be a 4v4 or 2v2. As has happened in the past with players offering an 8v8 to then suddenly be unable to meet those numbers.
What is interesting is how many smallscale players are so desperate to be noticed yet unwilling to meet us in our fights insisting we should come to theirs.
Izanagi.Xiiib16_ESO wrote: »Vilestride wrote: »Sensitive satori's all over the place.
I suppose while reminding me how few large scale groups were in the 6v6 you will also remind me how many top small scale groups have attended any 12v12 events.
C'mon kids. Let's just take a little banter without getting a frog in our sock.
I’ve been at all of them actually. My 6 man combined with animosity to 12v13 and you probably remember what happened. Needless to say, a fight did not. Not going to bring it up because last time it was brought up we took 5 pages arguing about what happened lol
Err what? You guys have never challenged us to 12v12 if we had been fighting we would have gladly accepted as we have accepted every other challenge made.
6v6 is not interesting to me. It is less interesting with so many rules. I have the feeling that even if we fought 6v6 our tactics would likely soon be banned because something is unfair or players would demand that it be a 4v4 or 2v2. As has happened in the past with players offering an 8v8 to then suddenly be unable to meet those numbers.
What is interesting is how many smallscale players are so desperate to be noticed yet unwilling to meet us in our fights insisting we should come to theirs.
Yeah I go to the events but we don’t have 12 so I just watch.
We ban earthgore in 6v6 because if it was allowed the fights would never end.
But yeah it is weird that 6man teams keep coming up with excuses not to fight the 12 man teams. But obviously the 12 man teams can’t fight the 6 man teams because where would they find -6 people to make it an even fight?
Checkmate 6 mans, lawl.
I guess you can easily invite 6 pugs to join your 6 man group then and tell them to follow this guide if it's truly this easy.1. Wear earthgore
2. Stack on crown
3. Spam AOEs
easy.
HaroniNDeorum wrote: »Right as the fight was starting? Lmao what a liar. We never agreed to fight with you, your captain was being an a***ole the entire night acting like a dictator deciding which rules apply which not, only with the intention to un-balance my composition so you guys can do the only tactic small scallers know 1.slot Db 2. Stack crown 3. Spam Dbs. Be a man and take a fight as it is, dont come and cry for rules only for your benefict, also dont put a **** as captain, was so annoying.