Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »
The use of any 2p set with two other 5p sets means sacrificing a Master's Resto, which seems like an unusual choice for an all-stam group.
I use a master resto and a 2 piece, have five SPC and will power. Works fine.
While that may work fine, losing out on a second 5-piece set (be it worm, master architect or mending) is just not worth it in my opinion; making 3 willpower suboptimal
I didn't say it was optimal, I actually use 3 transmutation for more regen in the use case that you have there, can never have enough in 12 man stuff.
As I said, you not running a second 5-piece to compliment spc is suboptimal. Are you a raid healer? Are you on PC NA?
I have healed all vet trials except for vhof as a Templar healer. I see what you said. You are implying that I implyed that it was "optimal", this is not the case. It is really funny that you are the one that started a thread that includes the words " non-meta" and now are giving me crap about being " suboptimal". The irony is strong.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »
The use of any 2p set with two other 5p sets means sacrificing a Master's Resto, which seems like an unusual choice for an all-stam group.
I use a master resto and a 2 piece, have five SPC and will power. Works fine.
While that may work fine, losing out on a second 5-piece set (be it worm, master architect or mending) is just not worth it in my opinion; making 3 willpower suboptimal
I didn't say it was optimal, I actually use 3 transmutation for more regen in the use case that you have there, can never have enough in 12 man stuff.
As I said, you not running a second 5-piece to compliment spc is suboptimal. Are you a raid healer? Are you on PC NA?
I have healed all vet trials except for vhof as a Templar healer. I see what you said. You are implying that I implyed that it was "optimal", this is not the case. It is really funny that you are the one that started a thread that includes the words " non-meta" and now are giving me crap about being " suboptimal". The irony is strong.
Hmm, not sure how to respond to this. Maybe I'll use these bullet points:
1: the spelling is implied not implyed
2: you were giving us optimalization tips, so you must care (to some degree) about optimalizing
3: you told us your "main" setup, and I just pointed out that your performance in terms of support could be improved if you were wearing a seconds 5-piece set and not 3 willpower or transmutation
4: now, if you're not claiming that your setup is optimal, why do you keep running it? I'm also not sure why you got defensive when i said it was sub-optimal
5: this was one of my guild's "fun runs", and 9 stamina dps is decidely non-meta, so I have every right to use that word
6: that being said, we do care about optimalizing (even when being non-meta)
7: I don't see why it would be ironic to point out that your build is sub-optimal while running an optimalized group (granted, optimalized around the premise of 9 stam dps and healers killing the valeriel copies)
8: lastly, what's your point, as a whole, when commenting on this thread?