I'm already hiding it with a disguise because I don't want to look like a ***. Means I get the advantage.Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
Not gonna happen. I will stay right here, demanding this.Well, ZOS just should fix the bug with disguises which hide your vampirism. Then there will be no way to hide vampirism as intended. And there will be no desire to demand more of these opportunities.
Pale skin and red eyes is the price you pay for the power of the damned. If you can't pay the price then return to the realm of mortals.
I'm fine with something to hide the skin OR eyes. Not both. There needs to be some kind of tell. Otherwise, it's just bunch of people getting their free stat boosts. That's the only reason most even want this, which is why it shouldn't happen.
I don't know if you are aware, but vampires have gameplay weaknesses too in the game, those being weakness to fire, which is the most common kind of magic you encounter in the game, and slower health regeneration. It wouldn't be just a "free stat boost" if their appearance was hidden.I'm fine with something to hide the skin OR eyes. Not both. There needs to be some kind of tell. Otherwise, it's just bunch of people getting their free stat boosts. That's the only reason most even want this, which is why it shouldn't happen.
Disguises are in a different section of the database and are intended to be used to blend into a certain group of NPCs. Some of them completely change a characters appearance.
It is for the same reason crown hair styles do not show with a disguise that it also hides vamp.
I'm fine with something to hide the skin OR eyes. Not both. There needs to be some kind of tell. Otherwise, it's just bunch of people getting their free stat boosts. That's the only reason most even want this, which is why it shouldn't happen.
Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
I don't see why that would be an advantage. Do you really have to know if your opponent is a vampire or not? And why? Do people actually swap skills if they are facing a vampire? But for those kind of creeps we do have bufftrackers on all platforms.
Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
I don't see why that would be an advantage. Do you really have to know if your opponent is a vampire or not? And why? Do people actually swap skills if they are facing a vampire? But for those kind of creeps we do have bufftrackers on all platforms.
It will give you an advantage because it lets you know their regen is going to be higher and they are going to be weaker to fire. it also lets you know they will have the undeath passive which isn't as significant, but still a factor.
It is letting you know something about them that you wouldn't otherwise know.
When you play at a high level, every little bit counts.
Just like how if I see you have blood spawn or skoria, you just told me what to look out for.
Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
I don't see why that would be an advantage. Do you really have to know if your opponent is a vampire or not? And why? Do people actually swap skills if they are facing a vampire? But for those kind of creeps we do have bufftrackers on all platforms.
It will give you an advantage because it lets you know their regen is going to be higher and they are going to be weaker to fire. it also lets you know they will have the undeath passive which isn't as significant, but still a factor.
It is letting you know something about them that you wouldn't otherwise know.
When you play at a high level, every little bit counts.
Just like how if I see you have blood spawn or skoria, you just told me what to look out for.
Does console not have buff trackers that tell you if they have vamparism?
Pale skin and red eyes is the price you pay for the power of the damned. If you can't pay the price then return to the realm of mortals.
Being what some see as ugly is not one of the downsides of choosing to become a vampire. More vulnerability towards fire and lower health regenration is.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »Pale skin and red eyes is the price you pay for the power of the damned. If you can't pay the price then return to the realm of mortals.
Being what some see as ugly is not one of the downsides of choosing to become a vampire. More vulnerability towards fire and lower health regenration is.
Here everybody wants to be the "Sexy vampire" a la "Interview With The Vampire".
Vampires are monsters. I'm happy with the scary appearance they have to choose.
How about this...use your armor and helmet. Then you can't see any of the hideousness.
Although, the Rivenspire Count Ravenwatch was able to hide his affliction from us players in that quest line. Consistency sucks.
Removing vampire would give you an advantage in PvP, because then people won't know that you're a vampire and have the advantages of it.
I don't see why that would be an advantage. Do you really have to know if your opponent is a vampire or not? And why? Do people actually swap skills if they are facing a vampire? But for those kind of creeps we do have bufftrackers on all platforms.
It will give you an advantage because it lets you know their regen is going to be higher and they are going to be weaker to fire. it also lets you know they will have the undeath passive which isn't as significant, but still a factor.
It is letting you know something about them that you wouldn't otherwise know.
When you play at a high level, every little bit counts.
Just like how if I see you have blood spawn or skoria, you just told me what to look out for.
I'm fine with something to hide the skin OR eyes. Not both. There needs to be some kind of tell. Otherwise, it's just bunch of people getting their free stat boosts. That's the only reason most even want this, which is why it shouldn't happen.
manavortex wrote: »Basically, the feature is already implemented.
I can completely cover up my vampirism, in PVP and PVE both. Was/is sold in the Crown Store.
I believe that countermands the argument of this request violating the lore or bringing any unfair advantage or whatsnot.
Now I just want to look like a vanilla human and not like a reactor accident or male genitalia. Thank you for your consideration.
I'm fine with something to hide the skin OR eyes. Not both. There needs to be some kind of tell. Otherwise, it's just bunch of people getting their free stat boosts. That's the only reason most even want this, which is why it shouldn't happen.
I wear a robe with a hood - my skin and eyes are already hidden. There is no tell. No one can see me. No one knows the person running past is a vampire. So why is this not a problem? I am still baffled why someone cares about what colour my skin is under my robe. How does that affect anyone but me? The NPC's don't even care.
And, (RP'ers aside), of course it's about stat boosts. Every. Single. Thing. In this game is about boosting your character. Why did you pick your race? Why did you pick your class? Why did you go those weapons? Why did you choose those passives? Why are you wearing that gear set?
I disagree with that. The reason why my character is a vampire is not that I dig the gothic charm and the sinister attitude. The reason is the extra regen, and nothing else.The point is that there's no validity in the argument of being a vampire if you don't want to actually be one. As in, exhibit at least partial features of a vampire.
It is, see the Supernatural Recovery passive. I do not have that passive available without being a vampire.Weapons, passives, and gear are features specifically and solely for boosting stats. Vampirism is not.
As I said. Give me the option to hide it, or nerf it down so that I don't have to use it anymore.I'm not even a roleplayer, but I still don't want to see vampirism further descend into this method of reaching "meta" status. That defeats the concept. As it is, many players already see it as a necessity. Otherwise, this topic wouldn't even exist. If it were up to me, I'd completely remove this infamous resource recovery from vampirism. But even if it never is, I stand by what I said. Not every method of gaining power can be perfectly ideal.
Why you personally chose to be a vampire doesn't negate what I said. The feature was not included just for players to get stat boostsmanavortex wrote: »I disagree with that. The reason why my character is a vampire is not that I dig the gothic charm and the sinister attitude. The reason is the extra regen, and nothing else.
What part of the words "specifically" and "solely" did you not understand? Vampirism was not included in the game for you to get stat boosts. Period. It was included for people that actually want to play vampire characters. The benefits and detriments come with being a vampire. It was not ZOS saying "Hey look, guys! This is for boosting your stats."manavortex wrote: »It is, see the Supernatural Recovery passive. I do not have that passive available without being a vampire.
I have been speaking out against monster sets and dropsets not being customizable time and time again because they force us to wear specific gear and deprive us of options for character customization. At least with costumes, those can be overridden - but that's a different peculiarity of topic, as are the candy crane weapons.
Someone holding a gun to your head?manavortex wrote: »As I said. Give me the option to hide it, or nerf it down so that I don't have to use it anymore.
And that was true back in the day when ESO first came out (Merethic Era, we didn't have anything). Also, each vampire state had a timer of 30 minutes, which was highly annoying for vampires in RP.doesn't negate what I said. The feature was not included just for players to get stat boosts
While that might originally have been the case, a high percentage of players runs vampirism solely for the stat boosts these days. Just compare the vampire-per-population-density with that of any Elder Scrolls Offline. I find it somewhat anti-immersive to walk through Mournhold only to find myself surrounded by 20% vanilla mortals, 60% flashy somethings from various Oblivion planes and 20% vampires on stage 3.What part of the words "specifically" and "solely" did you not understand? Vampirism was not included in the game for you to get stat boosts. Period. It was included for people that actually want to play vampire characters.
This is beside the point. In a world with illusion magic and Count Verandis Ravenwatch, being ugly is not a side effect of vampirism.The benefits and detriments come with being a vampire.
I'm doing this for PVP, so... I find various armaments aimed at my poor character, yeah.Someone holding a gun to your head?
Ragnaroek93 wrote: »I agree that vampirism should have an option to hide but maybe we can also nerf undead because it's the most overpowered passive in the game (PvP view).