Make shared gold on all users.

Beardimus

No, leave it the way it is.

No need for this..the bank is shared. Just bank ur gold, done. 100% no need.

disintegr8

No, leave it the way it is.

All of my characters don't need gold as I make everything for all my characters with my crafter. He is the only one that needs a supply of gold, the rest earn enough to pay for armour repairs without even drawing from the bank.

For my other accounts, I just mail gold across if I need it.

ComboBreaker88

No, leave it the way it is.

PlagueSD wrote: »

ComboBreaker88 wrote: »

That's a great idea until you get a million bounty one one toon and the rest have to pay for it. Lol

Then you just suicide on a guard and pay the 50g repair cost. Bounty goes away when killed by guards (along with any stolen loot still on you.)

No it does not go away if a guard kills you. Hahaha. Where did you get that info? The bounty stays until it ticks down or is paid.

IcyDeadPeople

I have high bounty on some characters, so this would be rather inconvenient if I log in in some area where there are guards and suddenly i'm carrying 1m gold that a guard might steal from me.

Sharing gold is not really an issue because it doesn't take up inventory slots in your bank. Managing all the bound gear sets carried by your various characters is more problematic.

Would be nice if perhaps all your offline characters spawned in your house so you could trade inventory with them.

CiliPadi

Yes, would be useful.

Someone start a poll for sharing mount training across characters. That's more useful :P

lasertooth

MrBetadine wrote: »

lasertooth wrote: »

it it ain't broke, don't fix it.

it's not a fix, it's an improvement

It would not improve the game at all for me. It would create more work. I have an assassin character, and to keep my losses down to a minimum I keep less than 500g on that character at all times so if I get trapped inside a building with a guard, I will only lose my stolen loot but not my gold.

I like the system the way it is; certain characters are rich and have 200k on them, other characters I keep poor with 500g on them. It's my choice how much gold each character carries and I would like to keep it that way.

Cpt_Teemo

Yes, would be useful.

I'd like to have gold shared but just using Q to call Tythis is better than nothing

Ulo

No, leave it the way it is.

But then how would i sit in the gutter roleplaying my begger character?

Slick_007

No, leave it the way it is.

TheMaster wrote: »

Tyrobag wrote: »

PlagueSD wrote: »

ComboBreaker88 wrote: »

That's a great idea until you get a million bounty one one toon and the rest have to pay for it. Lol

Then you just suicide on a guard and pay the 50g repair cost. Bounty goes away when killed by guards (along with any stolen loot still on you.)

You've never looked at your coin purse after being killed by a guard have you? They take your bounty if they kill you.

Which is actually pretty ridiculous and should change. If I choose death, that should be my punishment. Only stolen items should be lost if you're killed. ~Pibb

well in that case they should make the death permanent. otherwise what would be the point?

VampiricByNature

Yes, would be useful.

I keep 10k on all characters and then bank all the rest. It's the best solution I could come up with to make it easy on me. Thankfully I have the banker assistant or I would be constantly running to a bank....

jaschacasadiob16_ESO

No, leave it the way it is.

Wouldn't you prefer the ability to morph into an alt instead? That's what you are asking for, in the end. A click and puff you are your alt.

Avidspark

No, leave it the way it is.

...and have my sorc get bounty taken from it??!?!? HELL NOE!!!

The current, if it gets caught, all I lose is the items, no gold. If gold was shared on all alts, we'd be robbed by every guard we saw.

RodneyRegis

Don't see the issue. Every time you have more than 5k in the bank, deposit it with the assistant. If you don't have the assistant then you're obviously at a disadvantage, but that's the point in spending crowns on the assistant.

ADarklore

No, leave it the way it is.

ZOS won't do this because... BANKER assistant! Stop being cheap and buy a banker from the Crown Store... that way you have instant access to withdrawing or transferring gold and any other item. ZOS will never implement anything in the game that takes money out of its pocket.

Banana

Yes, would be useful.

AP to

Vercingetorix

No, leave it the way it is.

An overhaul to rewrite the inventory code is a costly process in time and resources. Rewriting code to operate differently like that requires a justification that makes it worthwhile, such as needing to correct a major issue like a memory leak or security flaw.

QoL improvements are typically made within the constraints of what's already available in the code to save time and money. Your suggestion isn't one of them, nor is it a critical issue.

idk

No, leave it the way it is.

CiliPadi wrote: »

Someone start a poll for sharing mount training across characters. That's more useful :P

Significantly less likely to happen.

zaria

i would like an filter who let me only see items in inventory then deconstruct, yes I know you can lock items but you still need to have research items unlocked, I also prefer to have sets with bad traits unlocked, make it easier to see if I find an better item.

Enslaved

Yes, would be useful.

I would see this as QoL improvement.

Sixsixsix161

The money in my bank is for special use like buying something expensive. Every so often, I dump the money from my characters into the bank, keeping a few thousand just in case.

I was thinking of doing that yesterday when I decided to purchase 6 Necro light armor pieces from two remote guild traders. Since my character had 29K gold on her, and the purchases came to about 20K, she's keeping the money on her till it gets up there again, and I didn't have to use the bank money.

Having said that, I like to have one character in an area where the bank (and auction house, i.e., WoW back in the dwarven district) is. Then, I mailed everything directly to that character and he/she handles all the money and purchases from said AH. So, I never had to take my character back to a main city to put money in the bank, or to purchase armor/weapon. It was nice to be able to mail money or gear directly to a character, and my bank character also kept all special gear that was account bound, etc. So, everything in one place.

Since this game has a different setup, I'll go with the way it is, but to be honest, I don't really care.

Merlin13KAGL

Yes, would be useful.

Vercingetorix wrote: »

An overhaul to rewrite the inventory code is a costly process in time and resources. Rewriting code to operate differently like that requires a justification that makes it worthwhile, such as needing to correct a major issue like a memory leak or security flaw.

QoL improvements are typically made within the constraints of what's already available in the code to save time and money. Your suggestion isn't one of them, nor is it a critical issue.

If by overhaul, you mean about 30 minutes and probably 10 lines of code, at best? Any decent programmer could have this done before morning coffee.

Here's the current psuedocode:

• Bank gold points to bank container
• Character 1 gold points to character 1 container
• Character 2 gold points to character 2...and so on and so forth
• Bank gold is changes only from bank UI
• Character gold changes on loot or pay out (repair, purchase, trade, mail)

Here's the replacement psuedocode with updated functionality:

1. Bank gold points to bank container
2. All gold autodeposited into bank container
3. All requests for gold pull from bank container
4. That's it...

Whew... I'm worn out!

anitajoneb17_ESO

No, leave it the way it is.

People are asking for achievements to be made account wide, for gold to be shared among characters, and what not.
If we carry on like that, our characters will just be different skins of the same thing.
I like my characters to feel different from each other, to have different lives and different backgrounds from each other.
Having to go to the bank to get more pocket money from the family joint account is part of this feeling of my characters feeling unique and different from each other. Keep it that way.

anitajoneb17_ESO

No, leave it the way it is.

PlagueSD wrote: »

ComboBreaker88 wrote: »

That's a great idea until you get a million bounty one one toon and the rest have to pay for it. Lol

Then you just suicide on a guard and pay the 50g repair cost. Bounty goes away when killed by guards (along with any stolen loot still on you.)

What a blatantly wrong info. Bounty stays until bounty's paid.

SquareSausage

Yes, would be useful.

How about this, would make everything so much easier and best of both worlds.

Any gold in Bank is directly usable by all characters, however characters still ALSO have their own money in the 'pockets' Imagine the use of a debit card as mentioned before.

If guard captures and kills you, he only takes money from your pockets, not bank gold, as the guard doesnt know the pin code for your bank

Easy, job done, problem solved, end of story.

Tandor

No, leave it the way it is.

anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »

People are asking for achievements to be made account wide, for gold to be shared among characters, and what not.
If we carry on like that, our characters will just be different skins of the same thing.
I like my characters to feel different from each other, to have different lives and different backgrounds from each other.
Having to go to the bank to get more pocket money from the family joint account is part of this feeling of my characters feeling unique and different from each other. Keep it that way.

This. So much this.

idk

No, leave it the way it is.

Enslaved wrote: »

I would see this as QoL improvement.

Buy the banker. Easy to move gold between characters, Also, probably the reason it would not happen.

Darlgon

Wot Mate? I put the gold in my shared bank, it IS shared among all characters. Skooma, the addiction must be real.

Slick_007

No, leave it the way it is.

SquareSausage wrote: »

How about this, would make everything so much easier and best of both worlds.

Any gold in Bank is directly usable by all characters, however characters still ALSO have their own money in the 'pockets' Imagine the use of a debit card as mentioned before.

If guard captures and kills you, he only takes money from your pockets, not bank gold, as the guard doesnt know the pin code for your bank

Easy, job done, problem solved, end of story.

this would make bounties virtually worthless since nobody would ever carry any gold. and if the bank was used to pay bounties, it would make this a very bad idea for reasons already stated.

NatalyaPeterovna

Yes, would be useful.

Nestor wrote: »

Wait, is it hard to deposit gold in your bank for another character to use?

yes, yes it is then ya gotta go to go to the bank deposit funds decide how much to put in take out
oy vey just share make life easy if theres a crafting bag why not a gold bag?

NatalyaPeterovna

Yes, would be useful.

thatlaurachick wrote: »

You can even have a personal banker, no need to run back to town for banking.

Vipstaakki wrote: »

Think of all the ways gold sellers could abuse this feature.

I don't think it was ever about gold sellers, but multiple people using the same account. Even though that part of TOS has never been enforced.

not everyone can afford 5k crowns =/