drakhan2002_ESO wrote: »I chose "No" because this poll is clearly biased toward "Yes"; also, I'd rather them take the time they need because it's also clear the OP has no idea how maintenance in IT works...there are so many variables when implementing technology that even an ETA will be missed occasionally. Best to just keep an eye on the forum update or the Twitter feed to know when the servers are back up.
Maintenance will be something we will have to live for the foreseeable future...why not get 'zen' and just accept it as part of what needs to occur - with or without an ETA?
Buses and planes have timetables because being on time is what drives their business - pun not intended.StackonClown wrote: »So then trains, buses, planes everything shouldnt have estimated arrival times - i.e. ETA, since people will complain if its not down to the minute or second... ?No, because if it goes one minute over ETA people will complain.
I'm no IT guy, I have no idea what they do during maintenance; they could work hard or they could simply take the servers down to save money.
^ This.StackonClown wrote: »Nope. A maintenance will end when it's ready to end. Anything could happen during a maintenance that could extend its time, and if that happened we would end up with tons of posts about ZoS lying to us about when it will be finished.
ETA - is an estimate... its not lying, its planning and projecting downtime - its not hard - almost ALL IT departments need to do it - cmon guys - arent a lot of you or at least some faimiliar with this ?
You never ever estimate to customers unless you really really have to or the damage was already done and the estimate is to stop the panic. They will complain more about not delivering on estimate than not having estimate. Case in point your thread
StackonClown wrote: »Yes this is a biaised poll - that was part of the point Im making
Thanks to everyone who voted!! even the Nos
Result is obvious:
Common Sense 1 - Trolls 0