Nelson_Rebel wrote: »
And one I'm completely conten no longer supporting if this is the line of thinking your are encouraging
Make everything as awful as possible because it has legal validity behind it.
Sure
Hyperbole.
Appeal to Extremes.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »your are encouraging Make everything as awful as possible because it has legal validity behind it.
enabling the company to continue to do so is, frankly, quite sad.
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »your are encouraging Make everything as awful as possible because it has legal validity behind it.
enabling the company to continue to do so is, frankly, quite sad.
Also: Strawman Fallacy
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »No, you choose the appearance of the weapon when you choose its level. If you dont like the cosmetic downside, dont use it.
I'll vote with the "No" side, for now. Will gladly switch to the "Yes" camp once more important things are addressed, like the stability of this game - from both a client and server perspective.
That being said, we will likely see weapon dyes long before stability - as there is not as much money to be made from stability as there is from "Get this exlusive dye combo, available in the Crown Store for three days only!"
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »No, you choose the appearance of the weapon when you choose its level. If you dont like the cosmetic downside, dont use it.
GreyWolf_79 wrote: »I'll vote with the "No" side, for now. Will gladly switch to the "Yes" camp once more important things are addressed, like the stability of this game - from both a client and server perspective.
That being said, we will likely see weapon dyes long before stability - as there is not as much money to be made from stability as there is from "Get this exlusive dye combo, available in the Crown Store for three days only!"
That's a bad argument, and one that I've seen far too many times on this forum. Whenever somebody says "I wish ESO had this", then someone says "no, they need to fix all the broken stuff first". Yes, obviously they should be fixing the broken stuff, and that should be their first priority. But that fact alone should not serve as a reason to shoot down any other game-related suggestions.
An equivalent would be, let's say you're living in a run-down apartment complex; somebody says, "hey, wouldn't it be nice if we had a swimming pool?" and your response is, "no, I don't want a swimming pool, they need to fix the plumbing!" Of course they need to fix the plumbing, obviously before they even consider adding a swimming pool. But that doesn't mean the swimming pool suggestion is wrong.
If we're discussing where to allocate limited funds, then yes, obviously fixing problems comes before luxury items. But I don't think that's the case here. Maybe you could create a thread asking ZOS to improve stability? Or, maybe you could put down the baseball bat... based on the number of fleshflies in the stall, I don't think that horse is getting up anytime soon.
Geez. It's a simple "I wish" thread. A simple yay or nay. Yay if you like it, nay if you don't. There are no expectations here. I doubt anyone expects the company to come out and say, "hey, we read a thread on the forum asking for this, so here it is!" The OP was simply asking if you wanted the option to be available, and you're saying no, NOT because you're opposed to the idea itself, but because you don't think it's practical. I'm pretty cynical myself, so I see where you're coming from, but seriously... if there was a poll asking you, "would you like to win the lottery and be a millionaire?" or "would you like to drink champagne out of the navel of a supermodel?", are you going to answer "no" simply because you don't think it's realistic? Come on, man! It's a video game. It is possible to both want weapon dyes and to also want the game to be made more stable. Even if neither one of them ever happen. One can still dream, right?
...once more important things are addressed, like the stability of this game - from both a client and server perspective.
That being said, we will likely see weapon dyes long before stability - as there is not as much money to be made from stability as there is from "Get this exlusive dye combo, available in the Crown Store for three days only!"
...once more important things are addressed, like the stability of this game - from both a client and server perspective.
That being said, we will likely see weapon dyes long before stability - as there is not as much money to be made from stability as there is from "Get this exlusive dye combo, available in the Crown Store for three days only!"
That's mostly because adding X number of dyes adds clear, measurable value in the eyes of the gamer, especially the layman armchair engineers. Not only is it notoriously hard to measure the impact and value of "better server stability", most improvements will go unnoticed by the vast majority of the players who can't recognize a difference. These same players get disgruntled en masse when there are long delays between "value" that they are able to perceive.
There are no easy solutions.
GreyWolf_79 wrote: »Geez. It's a simple "I wish" thread. A simple yay or nay. Yay if you like it, nay if you don't. There are no expectations here. I doubt anyone expects the company to come out and say, "hey, we read a thread on the forum asking for this, so here it is!"
GreyWolf_79 wrote: »Geez. It's a simple "I wish" thread. A simple yay or nay. Yay if you like it, nay if you don't. There are no expectations here. I doubt anyone expects the company to come out and say, "hey, we read a thread on the forum asking for this, so here it is!"
Sorry, I did not realize that I should not participate in a discussion if I had an opinion that described a non-present poll option. I fully expected to be told how to play the game on the forums, but at least know I know when and where I can discuss my own opinion in an opinion-based medium, as well.
Just like in any development shop, the developers are keenly aware of the feedback, as collected from all mediums. ZOS has a problem in communication. and even acknowledgement, of issues that do not impact their primary revenue streams. They do actively read threads like this, and even occasionally chime in on polls. Including feedback as to why someone chooses an option that he or she does not change the results of the polls, in any way.
If I would have chosen "yes" and included the same text that I did, this would not even be a conversation.
celner4_ESO wrote: »The severe lack of due diligence / competence"?" to fix the obvious server/game bugs and stability problems is disconcerting indeed
celner4_ESO wrote: »The severe lack of due diligence / competence"?" to fix the obvious server/game bugs and stability problems is disconcerting indeed
Hey, who knows what's going on inside ZOSThere could be a thousand different explanations for why we aren't seeing improvements. Most people default to blaming the developers, thinking they are either lazy, incapable, or unwilling. It's entirely possible that the Devs every single day are telling Management "WE NEED MORE/BETTER SERVERS", and Management saying "NOPES!"
Whatever the reason, their game will remain unpolished and less-than-stellar until they do.
celner4_ESO wrote: »Your opinion is voiced from your vote and your reason you believe to be valid is appreciated. Polls are created to get feedback from the community on what changes or additions we'd like to see from our developers, not to force a singular vote to get what the poll creator wanted
celner4_ESO wrote: »Your opinion is voiced from your vote and your reason you believe to be valid is appreciated. Polls are created to get feedback from the community on what changes or additions we'd like to see from our developers, not to force a singular vote to get what the poll creator wanted
Thank you. I thought that I was concise and chose not to rant about it, but simply explain the rationale behind what I voted for. It makes more sense than just saying "No" for the sake of saying it. Just like in real life, there is usually middle ground between any two given choices.
celner4_ESO wrote: »Your opinion is voiced from your vote and your reason you believe to be valid is appreciated. Polls are created to get feedback from the community on what changes or additions we'd like to see from our developers, not to force a singular vote to get what the poll creator wanted
Thank you. I thought that I was concise and chose not to rant about it, but simply explain the rationale behind what I voted for. It makes more sense than just saying "No" for the sake of saying it. Just like in real life, there is usually middle ground between any two given choices.
celner4_ESO wrote: »@AlMcFly
That link you put up yesterday for transmogrify implementation being in development really has me excited thoughhopefully it doesn’t get washed up or forgot about as they work on that!! I sure would love to see transmog come to ESO!
celner4_ESO wrote: »@AlMcFly
That link you put up yesterday for transmogrify implementation being in development really has me excited thoughhopefully it doesn’t get washed up or forgot about as they work on that!! I sure would love to see transmog come to ESO!
Especially since so much of the Meta in every class relies on dropped armor/weapon sets. That's a LARGE section of the playerbase that is wearing the same boring, sometimes ugly, gear. Transmogrification should have come far earlier, in my opinion. Endgame is populated by an army of clones whose only distinct characteristic is how creative they can be with their color-scheme.
OP, I am sorely disappointed.
Your title made it sound like ZOS had announced weapon dyes.
celner4_ESO wrote: »OP, I am sorely disappointed.
Your title made it sound like ZOS had announced weapon dyes.
@AlnilamE
Should I change the title? maybe "long enough wait"? They have announced Transmog being developed and in the works which means weapon dyes is a very likely possibility, just not for sure specifically with weapon dying. Not trying to be shadey with the title I’ll change it sorry...
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »celner4_ESO wrote: »OP, I am sorely disappointed.
Your title made it sound like ZOS had announced weapon dyes.
@AlnilamE
Should I change the title? maybe "long enough wait"? They have announced Transmog being developed and in the works which means weapon dyes is a very likely possibility, just not for sure specifically with weapon dying. Not trying to be shadey with the title I’ll change it sorry...
His hopes were crushed lol
On a side note. I intend to keep inquiring on this thread until an answer is provided
Stovahkiin wrote: »I do want to be able to change the colors, but only to an extent. I don't want to see people running around in cyrodiil with wedding dresses and rainbow swords...It's insulting enough when they destroy you while wearing the wedding dress alone ;(
celner4_ESO wrote: »OP, I am sorely disappointed.
Your title made it sound like ZOS had announced weapon dyes.
@AlnilamE
Should I change the title? maybe "long enough wait"? They have announced Transmog being developed and in the works which means weapon dyes is a very likely possibility, just not for sure specifically with weapon dying. Not trying to be shadey with the title I’ll change it sorry...
Nelson_Rebel wrote: »celner4_ESO wrote: »OP, I am sorely disappointed.
Your title made it sound like ZOS had announced weapon dyes.
@AlnilamE
Should I change the title? maybe "long enough wait"? They have announced Transmog being developed and in the works which means weapon dyes is a very likely possibility, just not for sure specifically with weapon dying. Not trying to be shadey with the title I’ll change it sorry...
His hopes were crushed lol
On a side note. I intend to keep inquiring on this thread until an answer is provided
BrianDavion wrote: »Stovahkiin wrote: »I do want to be able to change the colors, but only to an extent. I don't want to see people running around in cyrodiil with wedding dresses and rainbow swords...It's insulting enough when they destroy you while wearing the wedding dress alone ;(
but a bright red sword is ok?