ola.wilhelmssonb16_ESO wrote: »Does the rules against "naming and shaming" apply to third party websites, completely independent of these forums? Is posting a link to a site with pictures considered "naming and shaming"? I have a video of another bot-party in Greenshade, from about a month ago. I reported them, told ZOS that I had a video of them, but ZOS did not ask me to send them that clip...
Since making this thread, the bots have been replaced with a new set running on freshly programmed tracks.
If they did get banned due to my link, I'll make another one for the new lot.
Regards,
@SamboJ
Come see the bear spawns in Stormhaven on Xbox and the dolmens in Bangkorai. 15-20 rubber banded controllers doing heavy attacks at the spawn points all day/night. I report every one I see but it does little.
You know how to get rid of the 'bots?
STOP PURCHASING THEIR SERVICES.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello everyone,
As you may have noticed, we've removed the link for naming and shaming as it is against the Forum Rules. Though we have also given the link to the appropriate team to review the names and the area of Vivec's Antlers.
Many thanks for the report!
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello everyone,
As you may have noticed, we've removed the link for naming and shaming as it is against the Forum Rules. Though we have also given the link to the appropriate team to review the names and the area of Vivec's Antlers.
Many thanks for the report!
IndyWendieGo wrote: »@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom This is at an all time ridiculousness. This is why we need gamemasters in the game.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello everyone,
As you may have noticed, we've removed the link for naming and shaming as it is against the Forum Rules. Though we have also given the link to the appropriate team to review the names and the area of Vivec's Antlers.
Many thanks for the report!
Can you please indicate how we are meant to submit screenshots of bot activity? There seems to be no option in-game or through the support portal for providing evidence about this problem. If you want community help in stemming bot issues, reporting needs to be made simple.
ZOS_AntonioP wrote: »Hello everyone,
As you may have noticed, we've removed the link for naming and shaming as it is against the Forum Rules. Though we have also given the link to the appropriate team to review the names and the area of Vivec's Antlers.
Many thanks for the report!
This is probably hard to believe, but not 100% of accused cheaters, exploiters, botters, scammers, etc. are actually guilty of what they are accused of. That leads to innocent people being named/shamed on the forums for something that they did not actually do. It probably seems obvious to most of us when someone is participating in these activities, but not everyone is as adept at figuring it out. Also, some people have been known to accuse others of these activities purely out of frustration, possibly even intentionally lying about it. That is likely why there is a rule against naming and shaming.It's also kind of ridiculous how "shaming" the people that intentionally violate the Terms of Service is against the rules.
There's too many for me to keep reporting in-game! Pictures prove it all, any viewers are welcome to see for yourself & help bulk-report them!
External companies are being paid to level player accounts, they also sell ESO gold to players for real money! That deserves permanent ban (mac address).
Everybody is welcome to go to Vivecs Antlers in Stonefalls for a mudball fight against the bots!!!!
Kind regards,
@SamboJ
[Edit to remove naming and shaming]
This is probably hard to believe, but not 100% of accused cheaters, exploiters, botters, scammers, etc. are actually guilty of what they are accused of. That leads to innocent people being named/shamed on the forums for something that they did not actually do. It probably seems obvious to most of us when someone is participating in these activities, but not everyone is as adept at figuring it out. Also, some people have been known to accuse others of these activities purely out of frustration, possibly even intentionally lying about it. That is likely why there is a rule against naming and shaming.It's also kind of ridiculous how "shaming" the people that intentionally violate the Terms of Service is against the rules.