Silver_Strider wrote: »1) BSW is BiS for DK still, not so much for other classes
2) Yes
3) No, if anything it's been made even better after all the sustain nerfs because it still makes constitution a better form of sustain than medium or light armor passives.
4) Bone Pirate hasn't changed much in PvP. It procs and you throw on a shield instead of having it proc while having a shield but that's really it.
5) Block cost has effectively doubled due to changes to blocking times, maling tanking trickier. Good tanks will adapt, bad ones will drop like flies.
Think I missed some things but got th bulk of it
Silver_Strider wrote: »1) BSW is BiS for DK still, not so much for other classes
2) Yes
3) No, if anything it's been made even better after all the sustain nerfs because it still makes constitution a better form of sustain than medium or light armor passives.
4) Bone Pirate hasn't changed much in PvP. It procs and you throw on a shield instead of having it proc while having a shield but that's really it.
5) Block cost has effectively doubled due to changes to blocking times, maling tanking trickier. Good tanks will adapt, bad ones will drop like flies.
Think I missed some things but got th bulk of it
Bone pirate is not pirate skeleton.
Bone pirate is very good yeah, and pirate skeleton is more balanced for damage shield users.
Silver_Strider wrote: »3) No, if anything it's been made even better after all the sustain nerfs because it still makes constitution a better form of sustain than medium or light armor passives.
Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Question is if 94 extra stam regen are worth the low 150 wpn dmg."
Might be better off to take a full damage set and just change out a jewlery glyph.
[...]
BUT if I am not mistaken Constitution is not affected by the new regen-syphoning cps, or is it?