ParaNostram wrote: »Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Yes. That should be the point... but in reality we have:
Dragonknight - best Tank
Templar - best healer
Sorcerer - best DPS
Nightblade - best ...... ? Doing thieves guild & dark brotherhood quests ? ? ? NB was supposed to have best "focus" dmg (single target dmg - just like a typical assassin have).
You can have a NB tank, healer or DPS but it will never be as good as other classes in their specific roles.
But soon we will have warden that probably will be best at everything....
Warden feedback is across the board. Some say it's OP some say it's just eh at everything at once, some say it's just right.
Yeah I mean people who don't know how to play to a class's strengths and be unique and creative about their character and just follows whatever build they see on youtube or what the Meta tells them is good, then of course things will always fall into those categories. My Magblade actually does have my best single target DPS and not insignificant AoE DPS. She's also just tricky for me to play.
I really think people underestimate the psychological effect of worshipping the Meta and listening to the priests of the Meta. You already believe that _____ is just better than you at that so that effects how you perform. There have been tests where simply reminding people of a stereotype beforehand can effect performances (a math test on women where one group was reminded of the stereotype of women being supposedly bad at math and thus performed worse as a result as compared to the control group that was told nothing at all).
If you learn your class and master it, you can do anything you want on it. Will there be others that might do it better than you? Sure, nature of competition some people will play better. However, as I have said, I've seen NB healers outheal Templar, I've seen Sorcs tank better than DKs, I've been personally reached out to and asked how I do such high DPS on my Magblade. I never look at the meta, I never take advice from others, I just sit down and look at the class and create something that suits how I play. Enjoying your play style and believing in yourself goes a long way to improving your performance.
GuyNamedSean wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Yeah, the game is always being balanced for that purpose, but if they really wanted to set it up as something other than DKs as tanks, Sorcs as Magicka DPS, NBs as stamina DPS, and Temps as healer, then they should have made all four classes like the Warden is going to be. One skill tree expressly for tanking, one skill tree expressly for DPS with stamina morphs, and one skill tree expressly for healing.
You can build any class to any role, but it's blatantly apparent that this wasn't the original idea for the game.
DivyathFyr wrote: »Im curious stam is much better on other classes so its mag than a nb but a nb is a pure dps class how come its the worst then i dont understand
ParaNostram wrote: »Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Yes. That should be the point... but in reality we have:
Dragonknight - best Tank
Templar - best healer
Sorcerer - best DPS
Nightblade - best ...... ? Doing thieves guild & dark brotherhood quests ? ? ? NB was supposed to have best "focus" dmg (single target dmg - just like a typical assassin have).
You can have a NB tank, healer or DPS but it will never be as good as other classes in their specific roles.
But soon we will have warden that probably will be best at everything....
Warden feedback is across the board. Some say it's OP some say it's just eh at everything at once, some say it's just right.
Yeah I mean people who don't know how to play to a class's strengths and be unique and creative about their character and just follows whatever build they see on youtube or what the Meta tells them is good, then of course things will always fall into those categories. My Magblade actually does have my best single target DPS and not insignificant AoE DPS. She's also just tricky for me to play.
I really think people underestimate the psychological effect of worshipping the Meta and listening to the priests of the Meta. You already believe that _____ is just better than you at that so that effects how you perform. There have been tests where simply reminding people of a stereotype beforehand can effect performances (a math test on women where one group was reminded of the stereotype of women being supposedly bad at math and thus performed worse as a result as compared to the control group that was told nothing at all).
If you learn your class and master it, you can do anything you want on it. Will there be others that might do it better than you? Sure, nature of competition some people will play better. However, as I have said, I've seen NB healers outheal Templar, I've seen Sorcs tank better than DKs, I've been personally reached out to and asked how I do such high DPS on my Magblade. I never look at the meta, I never take advice from others, I just sit down and look at the class and create something that suits how I play. Enjoying your play style and believing in yourself goes a long way to improving your performance.
Jesus, this is completely beside the point.
And I've never seen a nb outheal a templar. You must of seen a potatoplar.
Templar wasn't meta they were just acceptable trial group comp were 2 magic dk 2 magplar 4 magic sorc. With the Nerf to RD which wasn't that big lower magplar execute DPS and the increase of Sorc AOE DPS made magplar DPS loss there place and teams to add more magsorc.Only reason teams still use 2 magdk is for VMol most teams us 7 magsorc 1 magdk for the flame damage buff.hmsdragonfly wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Are you kidding me?
The problem is mentality and lack of creativity. I've been here since the second wave of beta invites and I can tell you this is the way the game is. Some classes might have an inherent advantage in some roles but that doesn't mean they're a ___ class. I've seen NB healers outperform templar healers, I've been able to successfully offheal on my sorc since the changes to pets. Every class is capable of having solid DPS both stam and mag. Right now stam dk's might be king of the meta but that doesn't mean stamblades can't fill the role, that doesn't mean a solid magblade can't get ridiculous DPS (spoiler, that's what my magblade does)
Seriously? Are you telling me that when you look at a graph, you point to the outliers for results instead of the line of best fit? Just because there are a few exceptions (and the few is emphasized here) to a rule doesn't mean that they define it. I don't even remember the last time I had an non-templar healer and I'm sure most people here can say the same.
Templars have (or used to have) advantages in healing. Sorcs have advantages in dpsing. If someone can't compete with the meta, it doesn't mean that they are not creative it means that they are at a disadvantage. Just because you can overcome that doesn't mean it's fair that the other 90% or so magblades have to work 3x as hard to overcome a disadvantage that sorcs never have.
Templar DPS was the meta last patch (or the one before), not sorc, if I remember correctly. And they will still have the advantages in healing.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
ParaNostram wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Are you kidding me?
The problem is mentality and lack of creativity. I've been here since the second wave of beta invites and I can tell you this is the way the game is. Some classes might have an inherent advantage in some roles but that doesn't mean they're a ___ class. I've seen NB healers outperform templar healers, I've been able to successfully offheal on my sorc since the changes to pets. Every class is capable of having solid DPS both stam and mag. Right now stam dk's might be king of the meta but that doesn't mean stamblades can't fill the role, that doesn't mean a solid magblade can't get ridiculous DPS (spoiler, that's what my magblade does)
I highly doubt the problem with nightblades is the mentality and lack of creativity. It's rather the fact that we have been getting *** on patch after patch with nothing to compensate. It's take, take, take. You cant sit here and honestly tell me the siphoning strikes nerf was needed or even called for when class skills like dark exchange go untouched. Grim Focus was suppose to get changed and it never did.
If you want to act like everythings fine and, good because you enjoy the game, whatever. But I intend to defend the class I've loved since I started playing this game despite zos wanting me to hate it. Don't forget ZoS said they wanted this to be some kind of useless sneaking class so you're point to build every class to do every role is a little far fetched especially when there is a class out there that can do it all better then you.
Sorry but i must have kissed the part in the post you quoted where anything even close to "everythings fine and good" was even implied must lest stated or acted like.
Can you point it out or does anyone who doesn't agree with your crisis-de-jour just get thrown into that easy-to-not-think-hard box of yours?
Also can you please provide a cite where you can show ZOS saying they wanted NB to be useless or "some kind of useless sneaking class" or is the "useless" just a characterization you are working in there based on your bias as far as "sneaking class" goes?
pretty sure i have seen more than one thread about using Nb to sneak thru chest hunting some of the harder content. So maybe not everyone feels sneaking and useless are synonymous if indeed that reflects your bias and not a direct quote from ZOS.
Please recall, hyperbole is a choice, not a requirement and it is useful as a contrast element rhetorically not as a mainstay core premise/foundation to build an argument on.
His whole post pretty much implies NBs are fine and good. I think you need to re-read this whole thread, lul. He even suggests the problem is the playerbase creativity and mentality. Like.. What?
Last ESO live they said they wanted to make the class more useful through sneaking like in pvp.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Nightblade is very clearly a damage class, dont lie to yourself.
Templar wasn't meta they were just acceptable trial group comp were 2 magic dk 2 magplar 4 magic sorc. With the Nerf to RD which wasn't that big lower magplar execute DPS and the increase of Sorc AOE DPS made magplar DPS loss there place and teams to add more magsorc.Only reason teams still use 2 magdk is for VMol most teams us 7 magsorc 1 magdk for the flame damage buff.hmsdragonfly wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Are you kidding me?
The problem is mentality and lack of creativity. I've been here since the second wave of beta invites and I can tell you this is the way the game is. Some classes might have an inherent advantage in some roles but that doesn't mean they're a ___ class. I've seen NB healers outperform templar healers, I've been able to successfully offheal on my sorc since the changes to pets. Every class is capable of having solid DPS both stam and mag. Right now stam dk's might be king of the meta but that doesn't mean stamblades can't fill the role, that doesn't mean a solid magblade can't get ridiculous DPS (spoiler, that's what my magblade does)
Seriously? Are you telling me that when you look at a graph, you point to the outliers for results instead of the line of best fit? Just because there are a few exceptions (and the few is emphasized here) to a rule doesn't mean that they define it. I don't even remember the last time I had an non-templar healer and I'm sure most people here can say the same.
Templars have (or used to have) advantages in healing. Sorcs have advantages in dpsing. If someone can't compete with the meta, it doesn't mean that they are not creative it means that they are at a disadvantage. Just because you can overcome that doesn't mean it's fair that the other 90% or so magblades have to work 3x as hard to overcome a disadvantage that sorcs never have.
Templar DPS was the meta last patch (or the one before), not sorc, if I remember correctly. And they will still have the advantages in healing.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Nightblade is very clearly a damage class, dont lie to yourself.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Yes. That should be the point... but in reality we have:
Dragonknight - best Tank
Templar - best healer
Sorcerer - best DPS
Nightblade - best ...... ? Doing thieves guild & dark brotherhood quests ? ? ? NB was supposed to have best "focus" dmg (single target dmg - just like a typical assassin have).
You can have a NB tank, healer or DPS but it will never be as good as other classes in their specific roles.
But soon we will have warden that probably will be best at everything....
And the lack of understanding of the endgame environment. "Any class any role" is one of the biggest bullskit-lies that were ever told to people.ParaNostram wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Are you kidding me?
The problem is mentality and lack of creativity.
If that was the case Raid groups would run more than 1 magdk,at the very least 2-3. Hint they don't we only use one for a reason.The damage buff.hmsdragonfly wrote: »Templar wasn't meta they were just acceptable trial group comp were 2 magic dk 2 magplar 4 magic sorc. With the Nerf to RD which wasn't that big lower magplar execute DPS and the increase of Sorc AOE DPS made magplar DPS loss there place and teams to add more magsorc.Only reason teams still use 2 magdk is for VMol most teams us 7 magsorc 1 magdk for the flame damage buff.hmsdragonfly wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Are you kidding me?
The problem is mentality and lack of creativity. I've been here since the second wave of beta invites and I can tell you this is the way the game is. Some classes might have an inherent advantage in some roles but that doesn't mean they're a ___ class. I've seen NB healers outperform templar healers, I've been able to successfully offheal on my sorc since the changes to pets. Every class is capable of having solid DPS both stam and mag. Right now stam dk's might be king of the meta but that doesn't mean stamblades can't fill the role, that doesn't mean a solid magblade can't get ridiculous DPS (spoiler, that's what my magblade does)
Seriously? Are you telling me that when you look at a graph, you point to the outliers for results instead of the line of best fit? Just because there are a few exceptions (and the few is emphasized here) to a rule doesn't mean that they define it. I don't even remember the last time I had an non-templar healer and I'm sure most people here can say the same.
Templars have (or used to have) advantages in healing. Sorcs have advantages in dpsing. If someone can't compete with the meta, it doesn't mean that they are not creative it means that they are at a disadvantage. Just because you can overcome that doesn't mean it's fair that the other 90% or so magblades have to work 3x as hard to overcome a disadvantage that sorcs never have.
Templar DPS was the meta last patch (or the one before), not sorc, if I remember correctly. And they will still have the advantages in healing.
The reason groups still use magdks because they have more single target DPS than sorcs, not just the flame damage buff.
Before the buff to sorc, templar was meta. Acceptable? At the moment Templar DDs are acceptable, they are like 1k DPS behind non-pet sorc.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
ParaNostram wrote: »The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone
Then please explain why nearly every other class is getting rail roaded except sorc?
ZoS knows a majority of tanks are DK's and a lot of DD's are DKs. Rare are the DK healers.
ZoS knows most NB's build damage because they dont really have much else anymore.
ZoS knows most templars spec for damage or heal.
ZoS knows Sorc is the disgusting result of their inability to not cave to crying sorc players when they get nerfed. I.e The curse changes. Sorc will be the only class that can do everything when morrowind goes live.
Seriously, I would Agree with you if the game was not in the state it is. Right now its not useful at all to run a sap tank or a NB healer anymore. Hybrids have mixed results and thats only in PvP. BiS Dominates not just gear but class and race.
So Please explain to us again how "you can build any class to do any role" because as soon as morrowind comes along yeah. The chances of NB's being even remotely useful outside of PvP is going to be 0%. THE only way they would be useful aswell is if they used the new trial sets and became buff *** like healers and tanks are currently and thats just sad.
You want your statement to be true? roll back "some" of the nerfs NB's have had. It might of been the point of ESO a while ago but not as it stands now.
ParaNostram wrote: »*eyerolls at the thought of a "DPS class"*
The point of ESO is you can build any class to do any role. Come on. Stop thinking this is a WoW clone