AbraXuSeXile wrote: »People asking for ffa, no alliances, small scale/solo cyrodiil are clearly playing the wrong game.
Publius_Scipio wrote: »I tell DC troops what to do in zone. And they do it immediately. Ideal.
AbraXuSeXile wrote: »People asking for ffa, no alliances, small scale/solo cyrodiil are clearly playing the wrong game.
As far as I know, there is no other comparison for console players.. So, I think imagining a different type of Cyrodiil is within reason.
Id take original launch day or open beta cyrodiil any day
the lag was almost nonexistent, the map was alive everywhere and not just two or three ballgroups fighting over one flag, everything felt open and fresh and populated, 10 campaigns, all of them highly active....
but those days are three years gone. never to return. id take the batspam over the shitshow i saw before i uninstalled for the last time last year (rampant proc builds and full faction zergs at single outpost and keep defenses for every battle)
Id take original launch day or open beta cyrodiil any day
the lag was almost nonexistent, the map was alive everywhere and not just two or three ballgroups fighting over one flag, everything felt open and fresh and populated, 10 campaigns, all of them highly active....
but those days are three years gone. never to return. id take the batspam over the shitshow i saw before i uninstalled for the last time last year (rampant proc builds and full faction zergs at single outpost and keep defenses for every battle)
Stovahkiin wrote: »Never gonna see big changes like this in Cyro. You think PvP in general is empty now sometimes? Just wait until battlegrounds is released, cyrodiil will be a damn ghost town; there won't be nearly enough demand for any more big changes to it.