Has removal of CP increased server performance?

rivenjr

Please describe your experience and list the campaign you tested.

rivenjr

NO

Skull, Xbox na constant lag and performance issues.

Elsterchen

NO

Trueflame; PC; EU

FPS drops to 5; ping going throu the roof, since a long time I had disconnects (again) and real trouble login in again. Rubberbanding is eminent in PVP as well as PVE.

During big sieges I do notice alot of ppl getting freezes. (Not nice when half of the crew you rush into a keep with is suddenly just standing there).

On a sidenote: it is not possible to add CP while in cyrro. Seems they are not only disabled but dissappeared completely.

edit: Besides all this, its fun to play on a bursting full campain. Thanks to everyone for testing!

Ulfson

YES

For me, tonight was way better than last night or the last 365 nights. I could get attacks to fire and buffs to buff even in the middle of a breach with over 40 payers running around. I hope this test helps ZOS make pvp better to play.

Cimadon

YES

Definately. Feels good to be able to bar swap in a crowded fight again.

XBOX EU

Iyas

NO

TF EU total lagfest

Beardimus

YES

It's better Xbox eu. Had very very long loading screens however, and there was still some lag in big fights. Better but not gone.

Sashke

NO

no, the same lags - PC, EU, TF

Jitterbug

NO

Haderus EU PC.
Borderline unplayable ca. 10pm EU time.
Close to 1 second delay on skills.

Artemiisia

YES

Trueflame; PC; EU

I did apox 4 hours of pvp last night 310k ap gain

First after 2-3 hours with awesome gameplay, no lag and nothing to complain about.

I experienced 2 crashes, 4-5 of these 5 min loading screens, and a couple of lagspikes

would say thats an improvement, but still needs abit more to be sweet

Cherryblossom

NO

rivenjr wrote: »

Please describe your experience and list the campaign you tested.

I'm not sure why anyone expected this to be the issue! We had lag before we had CP!

Sigma957

NO

I would have said yes if it wasnt for the looooooooooooong loading screens and disconnects.

AddiZ

NO

Was in TF for about 2 hours yesterday.

Long loading screens check
Rubberbanding check
Invisible game mechanics (oil) check
Massive lag check
Unplayable at times check

Guess the CP is not the problem its the hamster running the server

Rickter

YES

I didnt have any lag outside of my own hardware limitations.

I run a 3rd gen intel 4 core proc and a gtx760 and a hard disk drive. so my pc is pretty slow and i maintained 20fps at BLEAKERS.

Id say there was a huge improvement.

Raghul

Depends wich group is around if i can use skills or not, nuff said

Lord_Draevan

NO

PC NA, Trueflame.
Hasn't made it worse, but certainly didn't make it better. Or if it did it was such a slight increase that I didn't notice.

Serjustin19

Other:

Was playing in Black Water Blade. PS4 EU. Yesterday. It is a no CP campaign.

Keep freezing and lagging.

out51d3r

YES

Trueflame PCNA. Feels improved, though not perfect. Noticed one red ping. Normally would get more of those though.

Sandman929

Thorneblade, XBox NA: Pretty busy last night, by Thorneblade standards. Felt like there were a lot of new-to-PvP folks running around, which is good. A little lag here and there for me, and a couple of guildmates still lagged out at odd times. Got in some huge fights though, and overall I'd say it felt smoother even with all the destro trains.

IcyDeadPeople

My fps was fairly consistently around 60 and I think the latency seems to be lower, but can't quite tell yet. Accidentally played on Haderus for a few hours and thought I was in Trueflame the whole time!

I wanted to try no-CP first a bit without making any changes at all to my builds. I noticed my Stam NB felt more powerful in terms of damage (although health dropped to 16k) and my mag DK felt weaker.
.

Minno

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

My fps was fairly consistently around 60 and I think the latency seems to be lower, but can't quite tell yet. Accidentally played on Haderus for a few hours and thought I was in Trueflame the whole time!

I wanted to try no-CP first a bit without making any changes at all to my builds. I noticed my Stam NB felt more powerful in terms of damage (although health dropped to 16k) and my mag DK felt weaker.
.

For me it's 60 fps avg, and consistent 120 latency on the big fights. In AZ last week my latency was around 80.

But if this was TF CP, I'd be at 30 fps, and 200+ latency.

Rickter

YES

when you guys say that "your fps was around X number" can you also post some basic hardware specs like:

"my fps was around 45-60fps during peak hours. gtx980 intel 5th gen quad core"

IcyDeadPeople

Rickter wrote: »

when you guys say that "your fps was around X number" can you also post some basic hardware specs like:

"my fps was around 45-60fps during peak hours. gtx980 intel 5th gen quad core"

mostly stable 59-60 fps, i7-6700K at stock clock and GTX 1060 6GB @ 1797MHz.

Rickter

YES

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Rickter wrote: »

when you guys say that "your fps was around X number" can you also post some basic hardware specs like:

"my fps was around 45-60fps during peak hours. gtx980 intel 5th gen quad core"

mostly stable 59-60 fps, i7-6700K at stock clock and GTX 1060 6GB @ 1797MHz.

ah-ha! yeah anything gtx970 and up seems to run ESO very well. thats the sweet spot video card. a 1060 is slightly a step up from a 970 so that makes sense that you are having little to know framerate drops

vamp_emily

NO

I play in most campaigns ( BwB, AS, TF ). The last few weeks in TF I haven't experienced any lag that I recall. Last night was different, very laggy at times.

[ I don't feel like posting my specs, but yes I have a nice gaming computer ]

Magus

NO

I noticed no difference in lag on PC NA.

Derra

NO

Does it lag less - yeah a little - but that´s because there are less actual fights and more siege and nobody uses skills situations.

In situations where people spam skills and actually fight - lag is the same for me.

IcyDeadPeople

Rickter wrote: »

IcyDeadPeople wrote: »

Rickter wrote: »

when you guys say that "your fps was around X number" can you also post some basic hardware specs like:

"my fps was around 45-60fps during peak hours. gtx980 intel 5th gen quad core"

mostly stable 59-60 fps, i7-6700K at stock clock and GTX 1060 6GB @ 1797MHz.

ah-ha! yeah anything gtx970 and up seems to run ESO very well. thats the sweet spot video card. a 1060 is slightly a step up from a 970 so that makes sense that you are having little to know framerate drops

I have settings reduced though. 1080p resolution, medium textures, high subsampling and I think grass, shadows and reflections off. Also, half the time I was accidentally playing in Haderus instead of TF, so haven't yet had a chance to fully test it against the TF zergs.

Minno

Rickter wrote: »

when you guys say that "your fps was around X number" can you also post some basic hardware specs like:

"my fps was around 45-60fps during peak hours. gtx980 intel 5th gen quad core"

Yea I'll get you the exact specs tonight when I get home.

Derra

NO

port into trueflame PC EU 19:47 german time. 541 ping display in spawn.

that cp myth is busted.

frozywozy

YES

You need an option "Yes, barely". Because lets be honest, even if we don't notice a big difference it still did, logically talking.