So AMD releases a buggy driver and you blame ZOS instead who has nothing to do with it. I would think people with such machines would be capable of rolling back the drivers instead of whining like children.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey guys, just letting you know that we're aware of this issue and are investigating solutions. Thanks!
kyle.wilson wrote: »AMD releases so many updates that create issues.
Oh god the fanboy is strong in this one.Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »Nvidia has far fewer issues and are the ones pushing the graphics boundaries into the new tech.
Actually HDR rendering has been around since the DirectX 9 days, and DirectX 9 was first supported natively by ATI back in the day...Who had HDR first? Nvidia.
Uuuhhh... 3dfx anyone?Who had dual graphics cards first? Nvidia.
Both are marketing terms for Adaptive Sync in the DisplayPort standard. And guess who's version is also royalty free?Who had Gsync/Freesync first? Nvidia.
nvidia has had A LOT of *** drivers over the years, if you can say anything about nvidia it's that they have better marketing lol.Both companies have a long long term proven record. AMD/ATI for bad drivers and slow adoption of new tech, Nvidia for reliability and new tech.
Funny, because I always hear about how bad the drivers are for nVidia cards and am glad I went with AMD as I've never once encountered any of these supposed problems with it.kyle.wilson wrote: »AMD releases so many updates that create issues. That was what kept me from buying a R9 295 X2 a few years ago.
It's also what is making me cautious about going all out in buying the new Ryzen 1800x. It looks good, but AMD has lost a lot of my trust.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Hey guys, just letting you know that we're aware of this issue and are investigating solutions. Thanks!