I am seeking understanding. Thanks in advance for your help.
I believe that there is a conventional wisdom that when in VMA, you should not use VMA (sharpened) daggers, you should use non-VMA (sharpened/set) daggers. The shorthand explanation for this conventional wisdom seems to be that "things die too quickly" for the benefit of the VMA daggers to be realized. I assume that the cost of using VMA daggers is the set bonuses you would be giving up (as well the enchant on the non-VMA daggers). So, limited, if any benefit, but a potentially meaningful cost. Hence, the wisdom to use non-VMA daggers.
So, my first question is, have I correctly identified the relevant costs and benefits for making a decision between the two?
Second, is the conventional wisdom that you should use non-VMA daggers unconditional (in other words, it holds for all circumstances/builds)? For example, for Maelstrom I run a stam sorc and I rely heavily on DoTs (though not all can be empowered by the daggers). When it comes to bosses/mini-bosses, it seems like there are ones that I don't kill very quickly. If my DoTs tick all the way through their cycles, wouldn't that be a situation where the benefit of the daggers is enhanced (thereby potentially changing the conclusion about which weapon to use)?
Also, I am relatively new to clearing VMA with only 10 clears under my belt. I am still learning the fights and, realistically, not looking for scores that would put me on leaderboards. Does that change the analysis in any way?
Thx.